1 / 21

Optimising the Research Climate: National and European Roles

Optimising the Research Climate: National and European Roles. A macroclimate approach Charles H.C.M. Buys Vice-President NWO. An optimal research climate in Europe is all the more important since:.

moses-barton
Download Presentation

Optimising the Research Climate: National and European Roles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Optimising the Research Climate:National and European Roles A macroclimate approachCharles H.C.M. BuysVice-PresidentNWO Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  2. An optimal research climate in Europe is all the more important since: • System changes towards a sustainable economy and society have become necessary in view of the global financial and economic crises • Under the new administration, the USA will recover as a major force of attraction for global talent • The new economies intensively investing in research and innovation are also becoming respectable competitors forglobal talent Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  3. The ERA concept, therefore, needs and deserves keen attention from the EU member states. It raises, however, the important questions: • What to do on a national level? • What to do on a European level? Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  4. EC research investments should not be used by politicians as an argument to reduce public research investments on a national level • National and European efforts should reinforce each other Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  5. Talent Selection • National competitive schemes should serve as a breeding ground for the ERC grant schemes • Condition: ERC grants larger than national grants; lower success rate Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  7. Advanced Grant € 3.5 M MOBILITY € 2.5 M Starting Grant € 1.5 M Marie Curie € 800 K € 250 K Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  8. Do the NWO talent schemes serve as a breeding ground for the ERC schemes? • ERC Starting Independent Researcher Grantees 27 • Previous NWO talent grant holder 20 (74%) • ERC Advanced Investigator Grantees 19 • Previous NWO talent grant holder 18 (95%) Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  9. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  10. In order not to lose our talented researchers, they must be given adequate tools : • Availability of appropriate research infrastructure is essential, both on a national and on a European level • The ESFRI roadmap represents an important step forward. Implementation? Linked mobility programmes necessary • National roadmaps for research infrastructure should be set up as well, with appropriate budgets • Money from structural funds is available to member states with R&D intensities below average, for them to come up to an advisable level Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  11. How to deal with big research proposals for which the costs exceed existing national and European funds ? • Big supranational research programmes will be necessary to find innovative solutions for the grand challenges of our present societies • Many significant innovations of great societal relevance came from fundamental research and serendipity, not from planned applied research • Still, relevance for industry and society is considered a criterion for research at least as important as excellence by most politicians • Not surprising that also the EC has always held that view, with the ERC being the important recent exception Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  12. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  13. Towards joint programming in Research: Working together to tackle common challenges more effectivelyEC Communication July 2008 • Consultation of national priorities (themes) • Determination of common denominators • Decision by Competitiveness Council • Formulation of common vision of Member States involved in selected themes • Translation into a strategic research agenda Government-driven, top-down processes on different levels Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  14. An alternative approach? (1) • European top scientists in the different research fields know each other, have regular contacts with each other, and often work and publish together. • They collaborate on projects of a budget size that is modest compared to what their ambitions deem necessary. • Progress therefore occurs in small steps Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  15. An alternative approach? (2) • Why not create a science-driven, bottom-up process to tackle the common challenges posed by the great problems of our societies? • Wouldn’t that work more effectively than a government-driven, top-down process? Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  16. The EuroBioFund model • EuroBioFund: a project run from 2006-2008 by the ESF in conjunction with and with financial support from the EC • Aim: to establish a strategic instrument for the dialogue and coordination of European life science funders and performers Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  17. The EuroBioFund method • Annual open call for cutting-edge research ideas of European scale and scope (necessitating a transnational approach) from European scientists • Selection of best proposals by steering committee • Annual brokerage event to provide the possibility of obtaining funding for the selected proposals via invited European funding bodies Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  18. Example • Metagenomics of the Human Intestinal Tract for Health • Aim: to enable modulation of the microbial populations of the human intestinal tract in order to optimise human health and well-being • Requested budget: €500 million for 5 yrs Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  19. Example (cont’d) • Status: started with 13 partners from academia and industry from 8 countries with a budget of €20 million (11.4 from EC) • European initiative has been an incentive for The Human Microbiome Project in the USA with a budget of $115 million • Further support sought to maintain a competitive edge in Europe • Preparation of a white paper on the potential of metagenomics in human health Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  20. An alternative approach! • Open call for transnational cutting-edge ideas of European or global scale challenges and scope • Selection of the best proposals by ERC panels for three domains (S & H; M, P, IC etc; LS) • Prioritisation by the ERC • Subscribing by interested EU and associated countries with specific budgets (cf. ESFRI Roadmap) Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  21. Thank you for your attention More information: www.nwo.nl Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

More Related