1 / 31

LCLS CAVITY BPM SYSTEM DESIGN

LCLS CAVITY BPM SYSTEM DESIGN. LCLS Cavity BPM Overview. RF BPM system current status Planning for prototype testing Planning for 8 LTU BPMs electrically identical to those in the undulator. Planning for 33 undulator BPMs. LTU and Undulator BPM System Specification.

mstovall
Download Presentation

LCLS CAVITY BPM SYSTEM DESIGN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LCLS CAVITY BPM SYSTEM DESIGN

  2. LCLS Cavity BPM Overview • RF BPM system current status • Planning for prototype testing • Planning for 8 LTU BPMs electrically identical to those in the undulator. • Planning for 33 undulator BPMs

  3. LTU and Undulator BPM System Specification

  4. In-Tunnel Electronics Block Diagram

  5. X-Band Cavity BPM Design • SLAC selective coupling design • Solid Copper Body • WR-75 waveguide output • Waveguide transition brazed to body

  6. Prototype Cavity BPM Specification

  7. Dipole Cavity Design • Beam pipe radius = 5 mm • Cavity radius = 14.937 mm • Cavity gap = 3 mm • Distance beam axis to bottom of wg = 9.5 mm • Waveguide= 19.05 x 3 mm

  8. Dipole Cavity Design

  9. Port 1 Port 4 Port 2 Port 3 H-field Produced by 0.4 mm Horizontal Offset • Waveguides are magnetically coupled to the cavity fields. • Waveguide coupling is symmetric in each plane. • Cross-talk contribution from the nonzero horizontal component of the hfield at ports 2 and 4 couples into waveguide. • Cross-talk can likely be improved by reducing waveguide coupling and by reducing the waveguide height. Courtesy G. Waldschmidt

  10. Monopole Cavity Design • Beam pipe radius = 5 mm • Cavity radius = 11.738 mm • Cavity gap = 2 mm • Coupling Slot = 4 x 2 mm • Shortest distance from cavity opening to bottom of waveguide=1.734 mm • Waveguide= 19.05 x 3 mm

  11. Monopole Cavity Design

  12. Survey and Alignment • Cylindrical design aids survey and CMM alignment • Cylindrical design for ease of machining • Solid Copper Body • Alignment surface flats for mounting

  13. Cold Test Prototype • Non-vacuum cold test prototype • Removable end caps • Accelerates test fixture development and cold test procedures • Prototype end of Nov. 05

  14. Miteq X-Band Low Noise Receiver • Existing product line • WR 75 Waveguide Interface • Low Noise Figure (2.7 dB) • Prototype delivery date 12/10/05 • Budgetary price for prototype $6500.00

  15. Prototype Receiver Specification

  16. PDRO local oscillator • 11.424 GHz (119 MHz x 96) • Phase lock to 119 MHz ref 0 dBm +/- 3 dB • +13 dBm output power • In-Band Spurs <70 dBc • Phase noise depends on 119 MHz reference

  17. Noise Estimates • Sensitivity: -58 dBm/0.2nC/1m • Minimum bit size: 16 bits/micron@ 0.2nC • Assumes 2 gain ranges for 75 dB • Noise floor <200 nm rms

  18. Long Lead Item Status • Receiver Prototype del. 12/10/05 • Local oscillator del. 11/24/05 • Waveguide del. 12/1/05 • Waveguide calibration kit del. 12/9/05 • CPI Vacuum windows 11/30/05

  19. APS Test Objectives • Develop a cavity BPM that meets system requirements and can be manufactured economically • Develop simulation model that correlates to prototype data • Transition from prototyping to production

  20. Phase I Injector Test Stand ITS Install single X-Band Cavity and modified off-the-shelf down converter receiver Mount BPM on Piezo two-axis translation stage Phase II Bypass line test with PC gun Install three X-Band Cavities BPMs Bypass line test with PC gun to start June 06 BPM System Test Approach

  21. Injector Test Stand ITS Beam Parameters • Charge- 1 nC single-bunch • Bunch length- ~ 3 - 4 ps FWHM for ps laser • Spot size on final screen at 5.5 MeV ~ 0.75 mm rms, ps laser

  22. Phase I Data Acquisition Design Approach • Instrument three channel down converters with Struck SIS-3301-105 ADCs 14-bit • Single VME board will provide the data acquisition for 8 channels • Epics driver complete • Digitize horizontal, vertical position and Intensity 0 to 1 volt range • Fit Data to decaying exponential at 60 MHz

  23. ITS Installation

  24. Phase I Testing Objectives • Test prototype Cavity BPM, down converter, and data acquisition • Generate preliminary compliance table to specification • Gain operational experience to determine if translation stage is useful, what are optimum operating parameters

  25. Phase I Schedule Milestones • Design and develop prototype Cavity BPM • Prototype non vacuum • Nov 05 • Build single Cavity BPM • Dec 05 • Cold Test • Dec 05 • Install cavity BPM into ITS and Test • Jan 06

  26. Phase II Schedule Milestones • Refine design and develop First Article Cavity BPM and support hardware • Jan 06 • Build 3 Cavity BPMs • Mar 06 • Cold Test • May 06 • Install cavity BPM into APS PAR/Booster bypass line and Test • June 06

  27. Phase II Testing Objectives • First Article Prototypes evaluated • Test three BPM separated by fixed TBD distance to determine single-shot • Complete test matrix

  28. LTU and Undulator Planning • Receiver and LO housed in shielded enclosure below girder 20 watt power dissipation maximum • Presently BPM output on wall side • BPM output flexible waveguide section allows movement for alignment

  29. BPM Mounting • BPM connects directly to the girder. • Mechanical translation stage used for alignment • BPM and Quad can move independently with respect to each other

  30. Undulator Planning

  31. Cost Savings • Reduce the dipole cavity outputs from 4 ports to 2 ports • Terminate the unused ports in vacuum • Eliminate 2 transitions, 2 windows, waveguide, 2 magic tees • Prove resolution and offset performance

More Related