1 / 20

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis subproject BARN 4th Workshop, 9-10 October 2013, Warsaw

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis subproject BARN 4th Workshop, 9-10 October 2013, Warsaw. Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos Institute of Hygiene dr.G.Gailiene.

najila
Download Presentation

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis subproject BARN 4th Workshop, 9-10 October 2013, Warsaw

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxissubprojectBARN 4th Workshop, 9-10 October 2013, Warsaw Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos Institute of Hygiene dr.G.Gailiene

  2. Aim: To evaluate the quality of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (the adherence to the local prophylaxis guidelines) in the countries of Baltic Sea region. • Objectives: • Evaluation of existing local AB stewardship; • Estimation of patients, who received AB within 1 hr – 15 min prior to incision; • Estimation of patients, who received AB based on the local guidelines; • Estimation of patients, who received AB after 24 hr; • Antibiotics used for prophylaxis;

  3. Methods • Multicenter prospective observational study; • Duration 2 weeks (10 working days); • Pilot studywas performed in November-December 2012 in General Surgery Department and Orthopedic Department of Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos. • Main study – March - June 2013 – in departments of: • Obstetric - Gynaecology, • Cardiosurgery; • General Surgery.

  4. Participants of subproject: • Greta Gailiene, Zilvinas Dambrauskas, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Lithuania; • Uga Dumpis, Aija Vilde, Pauls Stradini University Hospital, Latvia; • Piret Mitt, Tartu University Hospital, Estonia; • Pille Martin, West - Tallinn Central Hospital,Estonia; • Birgitta Lytsy, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.

  5. General data

  6. Results

  7. AB stewardship SE 2(LV,SE) 3(LT,EE,EE2) • AB doses • AB prescription duration • route of AB administration • alternative AB 3(EE,EE2,SE), 2(LV,LT) 3(EE,EE2,SE) 2 (LV,LT) 3(EE,SE,EE2) 2(LV,LT) 2(EE,EE2) 3(LV,LT,SE) 3(EE,EE2,SE) 2(LV,LT) 2(EE,EE2); 3(LV,LT,SE)

  8. Obstetric – gynaecology Types of surgery (N)

  9. Obstetric – gynaecology surgeryAB prophylaxis (%) *LV - 38.9 % patients received AB more than 1 hr prior to incision; ** EE - 1 (4.3%) patient received AB 8 min after incision; 30.4% patients did not received AB before operations (PAP is indicated only for hysterectomy, but 4 (out of 10) patients with ovarian surgery received PAP); *** EE (2) 45.4 % patients received AB more than 1 hr prior to incision, 4.5% patients did not received AB.

  10. AB used for prophylaxis before Obstetric- gynaecology surgery (%)

  11. CardiosurgeryTypes of surgery (N)

  12. CardiosurgeryAB prophylaxis (%) *LV - 52.2 % patients received AB more than 1 hr prior to incision

  13. AB used for prophylaxis before Cardiosurgery (%)

  14. Abdominal surgeryTypes of surgery (N)

  15. Abdominal surgeryAB prophylaxis (%) *EE - 1 (2.2%) patient received AB after incision; ** EE (2) - 12.5% patients received first dose of AB on time of incision or after incision; 41.6 % patients did not received AB before operations; *** LV - 9.7 % patients received AB after incision.

  16. AB used for prophylaxis before Abdominal surgery (%)

  17. AB appointment before surgery (%)

  18. Resume: • Multidisciplinary AB-team has only one hospital (20.0%). • PAP protocol updated according to the local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in 3 hospitals (60.0%). • One or more audits for compliance with the PAP protocol are performed in 2 hospitals (40.0%). • Antibiotic timing (1 h or 15-30min.) and appointment (surgeon or anesthesiologist, or both) before operation depends on the type of surgery, i.e. depends on ward, but not on hospital (except Tartu university hospital). • Patients received AB more than 1 hr prior incision in 2 hospitals, in 3 hospitals - AB after incision. • 4.35 – 98.5 % of patient received AB after 24 hr in all (5) hospitals, based on the Guidelines – in 2 hospitals. • 1st and 2nd gen cephalosporins or combinations with other antibiotics were used most common for prophylaxis.

  19. Recommendations • Repeat study; • Expand: • number of participating: • persons • departments • countries • duration of study • protocol (AB name, dose, precise injection or oral administration time)

  20. Thank you for attention

More Related