1 / 19

Epitaxial superconducting refractory metals for quantum computing

Epitaxial superconducting refractory metals for quantum computing. David P. Pappas. NIST - Colorado. University of California - Santa Barbara. John M. Martinis Ken Cooper Matthias Steffen Robert McDermott. Seongshik Oh Raymond Simmonds Katarina Cicak Kevin Osborn.

Download Presentation

Epitaxial superconducting refractory metals for quantum computing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Epitaxial superconducting refractory metals for quantum computing David P. Pappas NIST - Colorado University of California - Santa Barbara John M. Martinis Ken Cooper Matthias Steffen Robert McDermott Seongshik Oh Raymond Simmonds Katarina Cicak Kevin Osborn

  2. Challenges in solid state qubits 1) Need longer T1 • identify dominant loss mechanisms • Substrate & insulator– SiO2? • Kevin Osborn • John Martinis • Next session 2 ) Need higher measurement fidelity • Identify, eliminate intrinsic resonances • Junction dielectric?

  3. Design of tunnel junctions What we want: What we have: Spurious resonators in junctions Fluctuations in barrier No spurious resonators Stable barrier Poly - Al Crystalline barrier g-Al2O3 Interfaces: Smooth Stable No dangling bonds Amorphous tunnel barrier a -AlOx-OH Rough interfaces Unstable at room temp. Dangling bonds SC bottom electrode Poly- Al amorphous SiO2 dangling bonds at interface Low loss substrate Silicon

  4. Q: Can we prepare crystalline Al2O3 on Al? 68 Metallic aluminum 10 Å AlOx on Al (300 K + anneal) 10 Å AlOx on Al (exposed at elevated temp.) AES Energy of Reacted Al (eV) Aluminum Melts Al in sapphire Al203 Annealing Temp (K) • Anneal the natural oxides • Oxidize at elevated temp. Binding energy of Al AES peak in oxide A: No

  5. Chose bottom superconducting electrode to stabilize crystalline Al2O3 tunnel barrier Elements with high melting temperature

  6. Elements with TC > 1K

  7. Elements that lattice match sapphire (Al203)

  8. Elements that form weaker bond with oxygen than Al

  9. Elements that are not radioactive

  10. UHV growth system • Pbase< 5x10-10 Torr • Sapphire c-axis substrates • Sputter deposit Re Load Lock LEED, RHEED, AES Re Sputtering STM

  11. Morphology of Re/sapphire Room temperature growth100 nm Re 0.5x0.5 um • 3 nm RMS roughness • Mixed growth planes • c-plane • a-plane • Needs to be heated for barrier growth

  12. 100 nm Re, room temperature deposition + 750 C anneal 0.5x0.5 um • 1 nm RMS roughness • Re surface begins to crystallize between 550–650C • Need higher temperature to crystallize Al2O3

  13. Growth of epitaxial Re(0001) at high temperature RHEED diffraction images + 100 nm Re @ 850 C Sapphire substrate epi-Re on Sapphire

  14. High temperature growth – 100 nm Re @ 850 C 500 x 500 nm • 1.5 nm RMS roughness • 2 atomic layer steps • Screw dislocations on mesas • Stranski-Krastanov growth • Initial wetting of substrate • Formation of 3-d islands • Islands fill in gradually • Evidence of step bunching => some very large steps

  15. 100 nm Re, 850 C deposition – zoom in 200 x 200 nm • Step bunching on corners • Sharp dropoffs where multiple steps come together • ~100 nm wide mesas

  16. 100 nm Re, 850 C deposition, 1200 C anneal 500 x 500 nm • Much large mesas ~ 200 nm diameter • Still find step bunching • Temperatures very high

  17. Grow thin film at low T, anneal=> add thick film with homoepitaxy @ high T + 100 nm Re @ 850 2 nm Re, R.T. + 850 C anneal 500 x 500 nm => 200 nm terraces, comparable to 1200 C anneal

  18. Conclusions • Need bottom electrodes that are stable at high T T > 700 C • Demonstrated Re growth with large terraces • Films need to be annealed to > 800 C to stabilize surface • Large mesas with wide terraces can be obtained 3 ways: • High temperature growth ~850 C => 100 nm mesas • Anneal to very high temperature, ~ 1200 C => 200 nm • Low T buffer, anneal to 850, then 850 C film => 200 nm • Need to grow epitaxial Al2O3 on these surfaces

  19. Chose bottom superconducting electrode to stabilize crystalline Al2O3 tunnel barrier • Element with high melting temperature • TC > 1K • Epitaxial match to Al2O3 – hcp, 2.77 Å Re - hcp (0001) < 1% lattice mismatch • Re - smaller oxidation energy (sharp interface)

More Related