1 / 23

Post-disturbance trends in soil respiration from 1 to 3 years after forestry management

Post-disturbance trends in soil respiration from 1 to 3 years after forestry management. Amy Concilio, Lab Meeting 12/3/04. Teakettle Experimental Forest. Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer old-growth forest, Mediterranean climate Treatments: Unburned, Uncut (UN) Unburned, CASPO thin (UC)

naomi
Download Presentation

Post-disturbance trends in soil respiration from 1 to 3 years after forestry management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post-disturbance trends in soil respiration from 1 to 3 years after forestry management Amy Concilio, Lab Meeting 12/3/04

  2. Teakettle Experimental Forest • Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer old-growth forest, Mediterranean climate • Treatments: • Unburned, Uncut (UN) • Unburned, CASPO thin (UC) • Unburned, Shelterwood thin (US) • Burned, Uncut (BN) • Burned, CASPO thin (BC) • Burned, Shelterwood thin (BS) • Sampling: • Full factorial design • Points selected by Patch*Treatment combinations • 54 points

  3. Objectives • To determine how each management strategy affected SRR for the first 3 years post- disturbance • To compare SRR response to each management strategy • To compare the drivers of SRR between management regimes and years

  4. Methods

  5. Past Research (Ma et al. 2003) • Paired t-test • ANOVA • SRR= f [year, treatment (year), patch (year) patch(treatment)] • GLM • SRR= f (patch, burn, thin, burn*thin) • Pearson/ Spearman Correlations • Stepwise Regression

  6. 1 year post-treatment findings(Ma et al. 2003) • Burning significantly decreased SRR in CECO patches • Thinning significantly increased SRR in CECO patches • SRR in CC and OC patches did not significantly change

  7. Objectives • To determine how each management strategy affected SRR for the first 3 years post- disturbance • To compare SRR response to each management strategy • To compare the drivers of SRR between management regimes and years

  8. Mean SRR by Year

  9. Mean Annual SRR by Treatment Type Treatments

  10. Inter-annual variation by treatment

  11. Mean SRR by patch type and treatment from 2000 to 2004 (by actual disturbance)

  12. ANOVA Results

  13. Effects of Burning and Thinning

  14. % change in SRR from treatment to control [(TRT-UN)/UN *100%] Treatments

  15. Objectives • To determine how each management strategy affected SRR for the first 3 years post- disturbance • To compare SRR response to each management strategy • To compare the drivers of SRR between management regimes and years

  16. Effect of Burning on SRR

  17. Effect of Thinning on SRR

  18. Combined effect of burning and thinning on SRR

  19. Objectives • To determine how each management strategy affected SRR for the first 3 years post- disturbance • To compare SRR recovery times of various management strategies • To compare the drivers of SRR between management regimes and years

  20. SRR vs Litter Depth SRR (gCO2 m-2 hr-1) Litter Depth (cm)

  21. Thank you for your help!!!!

  22. Mean SRR by patch type and treatment from 2000 to 2004 (by actual disturbance)

More Related