1 / 25

Temporal Trends in Soil-Test P and P Recovery in Grassland Soils

UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK O L L S C O I L L U I M N I G H. Temporal Trends in Soil-Test P and P Recovery in Grassland Soils. Dr Michael Herlihy 1 and Dr Juliet McCarthy 1,2 1 Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford

napoleon
Download Presentation

Temporal Trends in Soil-Test P and P Recovery in Grassland Soils

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK O L L S C O I L L U I M N I G H Temporal Trends in Soil-Test P and P Recovery in Grassland Soils Dr Michael Herlihy1 and Dr Juliet McCarthy1,2 1 Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford 2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick The Irish Fertiliser Manufacturers’ Association

  2. Outline of Presentation • Background • Introduction • Results: • P balance • Soil-test P • P recovery • Summary and Conclusions

  3. Background • agronomic importance • environmental importance • trends in fertiliser P use and soil Morgan P values

  4. Fertiliser Use Courtesy of Soils Laboratory, Johnstown Castle

  5. Introduction • Long-term trend: fertiliser P vs. soil-test P • Trends in Morgan P: build-up or depletion • Soil-test P changes in relation to P balance • P balance = P inputs – P offtakes • Potential for enrichment or depletion of soil-test P • P recovery

  6. P balance trial • Component of larger trial: Fertiliser P requirements in relation to soil P status for grass production on representative soils • Objective: examine trends in P balance, soil-test P • 32 sites (8 x 4); low and high index groups; 4 yrs • Fertiliser inputs: P0, P20, P40, once-off P60 kg ha-1 P • Herbage and soil samples • Paper: Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research • Focus: soils 14 and 30

  7. Location of soil series

  8. Classification and characteristics of soil series

  9. Results: P balance

  10. Effect of fertiliser P input on P balance †Sum of 4 years (kg ha-1)

  11. Effects of soil series on P balance †Sum of 4 years (kg ha-1)

  12. Cumulative P balance† for soils 14 and 30 †kg ha-1

  13. Results: Morgan P • Changes in P balance affect trends in soil-test P

  14. Effects of fertiliser P on Morgan P (a) low index group (Spring)

  15. Effects of fertiliser P on Morgan P (b) high index group

  16. Soil 30 mg l-1 P mg l-1 P Trends in Morgan P: low index group Soil 14

  17. Soil 30 mg l-1 P mg l-1 P Trends in Morgan P: high index group Soil 14

  18. Results: Morgan P • Soil-test P decline esp. P0 • Largest decline: higher index • Change on P40 plots ns - annual fluctuations, inputs ~ offtakes • P20 and P60 Morgan P comparable after 3 years • Decline: 30 > 14

  19. Unit change ratio • Change P balance : unit change Morgan P • P0 plots • Low index: 79:1 (soil 14); 28:1 (soil 30) • High: 29:1 (soil 14) and 12:1 (soil 30) • Variation with index and P input • Effects of soil chemistry and texture

  20. (b) high index group % % % Recovery - P60 (a) low index group

  21. Results: P Recovery • Highest on soil 30 • Highest in low index group • Increased with time … 4 years • May underestimate recoveries attainable over a longer period

  22. Summary of results • Changes in P balance and soil-test P affected by: • Soil series • Fertiliser P input • Initial soil-P status (index) • High offtakes reduced soil P rapidly: large decline in 4 yrs • Depletion of soil P, fertiliser-P recovery varied widely between contrasting soils • Clonroche loam 14 vs. light limestone Baggotstown 30

  23. Conclusions • Cannot assume direct relationships between inputs and offtakes in different soils • Effects of soil series, fertiliser-P inputs, P index on change in P balance, soil-test P and recovery • Large reductions in soil-test P in 4 yrs with no fertiliser-P input … • Cut vs. grazed swards: offtakes, duration • Regular soil testing essential

  24. Future Work • Differences in soil-test P changes, recoveries between soils … causes?

  25. UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK O L L S C O I L L U I M N I G H Acknowledgements • IFMA • Research Office, UL • Farmers The Irish Fertiliser Manufacturers’ Association

More Related