1 / 12

Can we achieve net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and meet global food demand?

Can we achieve net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and meet global food demand?. Richard Eckard, Snow Barlow MSLE, The University of Melbourne FFSRU, DPI Victoria. World Population by 2050. 6.1 B in 2000 9.1 B by 2050 (mid scenario) Developing world ~ 54% Developed world ~ 7%

nerys
Download Presentation

Can we achieve net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and meet global food demand?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Can we achieve net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and meet global food demand? Richard Eckard, Snow Barlow MSLE, The University of Melbourne FFSRU, DPI Victoria

  2. World Population by 2050 • 6.1 B in 2000 • 9.1 B by 2050 (mid scenario) • Developing world ~ 54% • Developed world ~ 7% • Sub-Saharan Africa • Largest % increase • South and East Asia • Largest population centre United Nations (2004); U.S. Census Bureau (2010); UN (2008)

  3. Food Demand by 2050 • Additional 3B people • Global food production increase 70% • Developed countries • Mostly high value food The additional food required will need to be produced locally in developing countries, where research has historically not be as well resourced and communicated as in developed countries FAO (2006)

  4. World Agricultural Emissions • 5.2 Gt CO2e/yr in 1990 • 6.1 Gt CO2e/yr in 2005 • 17% increase • 54% CH4 • 46% N2O • 2030 projected increases (AR4) • N2O emissions +35 to 60% • Livestock CH4 +60% Smith et al (2007); US-EPA (2006)

  5. On farm non- CO2 emissions U.S. Census Bureau (2010); US-EPA (2006); Eckard (2011)

  6. Agricultural Emissions Projections • Developing world • Grows by 54% @ 0.85 t CO2e/person • Developed world • Grows by 7% @ 1.65 t CO2e/person • Agricultural emissions • 8.8 Gt CO2e by 2050 • 54% increase over 2000 U.S. Census Bureau (2010); US-EPA (2006); Eckard (2011)

  7. Abatement potential • Estimates from currently technology • 15 to 56% for CH4 • 9 to 26% for N2O • Likely adoption by 2050 • Developed countries • 20% with policy drivers • Developing countries • Food production and security a higher priority • 0% abatement most likely Net result = 7.0 Gt CO2e 23% increase in GHG from agriculture by 2050 over 2000 Eckard et al (2010); Smith et al (2007)

  8. Emissions per unit product in EU Carlsson-Kanyama (1998)

  9. Other Arguments • Livestock products • Demand +44% by 2030 • Increasing wealth • BUT • Mainly poultry, pork, aquaculture, dairy • Less trend for red meat, mainly goats • East less red meat? • Developing world (54%) • Cultural or no choice • Main trend in white meat • Developed world (7%) • Decreasing trend, but small contribution FAO (2008)

  10. Methane(g/L milk) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 1979-80 1989-90 1999-00 2009-10 2009-10 Policy and Research • Policy direction needed for research • Focus on win-win productivity growth • Maintain viable agriculture/rural communities • Meet growing food demand • But with less emissions than BAU • Less t CO2e/t product • Developed world • Fund low emissions food research • Extend this to developing countries t CO2e/t beef Moate et al (2011); Henry & Eckard (2009)

  11. In Conclusion • Agricultural emissions • Will increase to 2050 • Even with mitigation policy • Changing diet patterns • May not have a big impact • Win-win research is critical • Improving productivity growth AND • Emissions intensity of food produced • This is the only way in which already challenging global food production targets can be met, but with fewer emissions than would have otherwise occurred

  12. www.greenhouse.unimelb.edu.au

More Related