1 / 28

Interfaces for Retrieval Results

Interfaces for Retrieval Results. Information Retrieval Activities. Selecting a collection Talked about last class Lists, overviews, wizards, automatic selection Submitting a request Balancing expressiveness and usability Command line, graphical, and NL interfaces Examining the response

nerys
Download Presentation

Interfaces for Retrieval Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interfaces for Retrieval Results

  2. Information Retrieval Activities • Selecting a collection • Talked about last class • Lists, overviews, wizards, automatic selection • Submitting a request • Balancing expressiveness and usability • Command line, graphical, and NL interfaces • Examining the response • Comprehension • Contextual displays

  3. Evaluating Retrieval Results • Selecting among returned documents • Requires partial understanding of documents without looking at whole document • To provide understanding of documents: • Show relations to query terms • Show in collection overviews • Provide descriptive metadata • Indicate document structure • Indicate the hyperlink structure • Indicate relations between returned documents

  4. Document Surrogates • Resulting documents are presented by partial information about document • Important metadata (title, date, source) • Selected chunks of document • Thumbnail images of documents • Some systems provide short and long document surrogates. • Normally, clicking on a surrogate causes the document to be displayed.

  5. Example Surrogates

  6. Ranked List

  7. Document Relation to Query • Simple ways to indicate relation: • Select snippet with query terms • Highlight query terms in document display (thumbnail or whole) • Scroll to first occurrence of query term

  8. Popout Prism

  9. Popout Prism

  10. Keyword in Context (KWIC) • KWIC document surrogates • Phrases and sentences with query terms are extracted • These snippets are presented along with metadata • Design issues • Deciding how many and which occurrences of keywords to show • Use query term weights, if any • Evidence indicates selecting text segments with largest number of query terms that appear near beginning of document

  11. TileBars • TileBars is a compact visualization of documents’ relation to query terms. • Document surrogate is a rectangular bar divided into a matrix/table • Rows correspond to query facets • Columns are sections of document • Darkness in each row/column position indicates the occurrence of that facet in that portion of the document.

  12. TileBars

  13. SeeSoft • Visualization where each line of document is visualized as line in graphical column • Color indicates characteristics of the line. • Originally developed to help understand program code • Applied to document analysis and text retrieval

  14. SeeSoft

  15. Relative Query Term Relations • Prior set of systems present individual documents and their relation to query terms • To present a larger number of results • Visually represent sets of documents • Indicate sets’ relations to query terms • Examples • InfoCrystal • VIBE

  16. InfoCrystal

  17. VIBE

  18. Superbook • Uses a table of contents to indicate where query terms appear • Requires document structure

  19. Categories for Retrieval Results • Present results in groups based on some categorization • Categories can be based on metadata • Categories canbe inferred • Categories canbe chosen basedon query type(DynaCat)

  20. DynaCat

  21. Hyperlinks for Retrieval Results • Present navigational links between retrieved documents • Relies on links between documents • Most often used for searching a single web site (or similar repository) • Examples • Cha-Cha • Mapuccino

  22. Cha-Cha

  23. Mapuccino

  24. Table Views for Retrieval Results • Category and link views present only one type of interdocument relation • Documents have many different potential relations • Tabular views can provide an overview of a set of relations • Each row is a document • Each column is an attribute (metadata field or other) • Content of table indicates values and relations between values • Examples • Envision • TableLens

  25. Envision

  26. TableLens

  27. Summary • Users must partly understand retrieval results to select which to view. • Techniques: • Highlighting and scrolling indications of relations to search terms (snippets, Google cache, Popout Prism) • Set-based views in relation to search terms (InfoCrystal, VIBE) • Visualization of search terms in sections (TileBars, SeeSoft, SuperBook) • Categorization of results (DynaCat, clusty.com) • Hyperlinks between results (Cha-Cha, Mapuccino) • Table views of results (Envision, TableLens)

More Related