1 / 22

The Chandra view of Mrk 279

The Chandra view of Mrk 279. Elisa Costantini SRON, National Institute for Space Research Astronomical Institute Utrecht. Outline. Mrk 279 Chandra-LETGS observation Emission spectrum Broad lines UV– X-rays modeling Absorption components Warm absorber Redshift zero absorption

neveah
Download Presentation

The Chandra view of Mrk 279

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Chandra view of Mrk 279 Elisa Costantini SRON, National Institute for Space Research Astronomical Institute Utrecht

  2. Outline Mrk 279 Chandra-LETGS observation Emission spectrum • Broad lines • UV– X-rays modeling Absorption components • Warm absorber • Redshift zero absorption Conclusions Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  3. Mrk 279 previous study • z = 0.0306 • ASCA (Weaver et al. 2001) • Variable iron line at 6.4 keV • On the line of sight of ionized gas at z=0 (Savage et al. 2003) • HTS+FUSE+Chandra HETGS (Scott et al. 2004) • 4 absorption systems from the host galaxy • 1 warm absorber Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  4. LETGS observation of Mrk 279 - 10-20th May 2003 - 7 shots (30-100 ks) - Total exposure: 355 ks • - FUSE (91 ks) + HST (41.3 ks) • Arav et al. 2004, 2005 • Gabel et al. 2005 Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  5. The first fit • Complex oxygen region: • Narrow emission lines (OVII f, OVIII Ly α) • Absorption lines  OI-OVIII • Broad emission features OVII, OVIII Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  6. X-rays broad lines in Sy 1 NGC 5548 Broad emission lines  Iron K α 6.4 keV (Tanaka 1995) OVII triplet (21.5-22.09 Å) (ngc5548 Steenbrugge et al. 2005) OVIII Ly α (18.96 Å) (ngc4051 Ogle et al. 2004, Fenovcik et al. 2005) Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  7. X-rays broad lines in Sy 1 Broad emission lines  Iron K α 6.4 keV (Tanaka 1995) OVII triplet (21.5-22.09 Å) (ngc5548 Steenbrugge et al. 2005) OVIII Ly α (18.96 Å) (ngc4051 Ogle et al. 2004, Fenovcik et al. 2005) Relativistic broadening Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  8. UV broad lines Gabel et al. 2005 FWHM=11000 km/s Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  9. The LOC method • One component of ionized emitting gas is inadequate to describe emission.  BLR as a distribution of clouds with different density, distance, column density, and covering factor. (Baldwin et al. 1995, Ferland et al.) The Locally Optimally emitting Cloud (LOC)  Successfully applied to NGC 5548 (Korista & Goad 2000) Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  10. Reflected Transmitted The LOC method (2) Ingredients for the BLR: Log NH=23 cm-2 Cf =0.5 Log n = 8-12.5 cm-3 Log r = 15.2-17.5 cm Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  11. FUSE+HST best fit:  = 0.89 • = 0.97 X-ray line luminosity ! Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  12. Where are the lines produced? BLR size: 6-17 ldays (Santos-Lleo et al. 2001) Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  13. No strong evidence of : • highly ionized skin of the BLR • relativistically broadened profile of OVIII Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  14. Warm absorber: the models • SPEX (Kaastra 2001) • SLAB: transmission from a thin layer. Parameters: ionic column densities, outflow velocity, line broadening • XABS: fit with a pre-calculated grid of NH and ξ, gi ven a SED relies on XSTAR or Cloudy Parameters: NH, ξ, outflow velocity, line broadening • WARM: a continuos distribution of XABS Parameters: outflow velocity, sigma, ξlowξhigh Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  15. Warm absorber: variability • Difficult issue because: • High S/N • High resolution • Sufficient flux amplitude variation • Long time scale variation: e.g. ngc 3516 (Turner et al.2005) ngc 4151 (Kraemer et al. 2005) • Short time scale variation: No ngc 5548 (Steenbrugge et al. 2005) ngc 3783 (Netzer et al. 2003) Yes ngc 4051 (Krongold et al. 2005) 0 days 10 Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  16. warm absorber variability Logξ 2.5 0.46 NH • Large error bars • Large scatter in the ionization parameter Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  17. The warm absorber (2) 3 ionized warm absorbers intrinsic to Mrk 279 2 absorbers in the Milky Way Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  18. The nature of the wa in mrk 279 No pressure equilibrium  continuous distribution ? Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  19. Continuous vs clumpy wa • Phases in pressure equilibrium • NGC 3783 (Netzer et al. 2003, • Krongold et al. 2003) • Prompt reaction to flux variation • Continuous distribution • NGC 4051 (Ogle et al. 2004) • NGC 5548 (Steenbrugge et al. 2005) NGC5548 Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  20. The Milky way ionized absorber Blue wing v= - 87 km/s σ = 80 km/s (Kaastra et al in prep.) Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  21. Z=0 absorber: interpretation • predicted EW(OVI)X =0.74 mÅ, consistent with non detection • if OVII were connected with the narrow UV component •  deep OVII edge which is not observed Global UV-X model: collisionally ionized absorber Winning interpretation:HVC complex C/K v= -(100-55) km/s solar metallicity Warsaw warm absorber workshop

  22. Conclusions • Broad lines: HST + FUSE  BLR lines in X-rays  independent constraints to the X-ray spectral fit. No strong evidence of a highly ionized skin of the BLR No strong evidence of relativistic profiles • Warm absorbers: 3 main components, not variable, possibly in a continuous outflow z=0 absorption: most likely in the Milky Way Warsaw warm absorber workshop

More Related