1 / 27

Cost and Schedule WBS 1.0

This document provides an update on the cost and schedule for the Forward Vertex Detector (FVTX) project, including participating institutions, organizational plan, changes since November 2007, and estimated costs. It also discusses the risk mitigation strategies for the project.

nicholasdonaldson
Download Presentation

Cost and Schedule WBS 1.0

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cost and ScheduleWBS 1.0 David M. Lee Los Alamos National Lab Deputy Project Leader David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  2. Forward Vertex DetectorCost & Schedule Talk Outline • Participating Institutions • Organizational plan • Changes since Nov 2007 • Cost • Schedule David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  3. Participating and Interested Institutions Los Alamos National Laboratory LANL coordinate work to procure the silicon sensors, work with FNAL on the development of the PHX chip, on development of the interface to PHENIX DAQ, and on the simulation effort with NMSU. Los Alamos is currently leading the mechanical engineering and the integration effort for the barrel detector, VTX, and will continue those efforts for the FVTX. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Involvment still under discussion Brookhaven National Laboratory Brookhaven manages the integration and ancillary systems for the VTX and will do the same for the FVTX. They might also participate in software and the assembly of the disks and cages. Charles University, Czech Technical University, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, Prague The Czech groups will participate in sensor testing Columbia University Columbia University has major responsibility with the complete wedge assembly and testing. They are also have co-responsibility for the FPHX chip and are active in the software simulations. Iowa State University Iowa State University is currently working on management details with the barrel detector and working on an (funded) SBIR effort for the level one trigger capabilities of the FVTX. New Mexico State University NMSU will be responsible for the FVTX detector assembly, as well as managing and working on comprehensive simulations for the FVTX effort and working on the sensor testing. Saclay Saclay will work on software . 

  4. Participating and Interested Institutions University of Jyvaskyla Involvment still under discussion. Have indicated that they will contribute students in the assembly and testing University of New Mexico UNM has experience in testing, Q/A and a laboratory for characterization of sensors. They will participate in sensor testing They may also work on the HDI and flex cables. Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea Involvment still under discussion David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  5. Cabling D. Fields UNM Wedge D. Winter Columbia HDI M. Hoferkamp UNM, Columbia Wedge Assembly D. Winter/TBD Columbia, NMSU, UNM Flex Cable D. Fields UNM Wire Bond D. Winter/TBD Columbia Fibers D. Fields UNM Wedge QA D. Winter/TBD Columbia, NMSU UNM Metrology D. Winter/TBD Columbia Organizational Chart DOE Office of Nuclear Physics Helmut Marsiske Federal Program Manager BNL Program Manager Tom Ludlam BNL PHENIX Management Spokesperson B. Jacak Operation Manager E. O’Brien Upgrade Manager A. Drees PHENIX FVTX Project Office Project Manager: M. Brooks (LANL) Deputy Project Manager: D. Lee (LANL) Electronics Project Engineer: E. Mannel (Columbia) Mechanical Project Engineer: W. Sondheim (LANL) DAQ M. Brooks LANL Sensor J. Kapustinsky/ LANL FPHX J. Kapustinsky/ D. Winter LANL/Columbia Integration Mechanics R. Pak BNL Assembly Installation S. Pate NMSU Software vanHecke,X. Wang LANL,NMSU ROC M. Prokop LANL Sensor Design J. Kapustinsky LANL, Columbia, Czech FPHX Design R. Yarema FNAL,LANL, Columbia Mech Structures D. Lee LANL Disk Assembly S. Pate/PD NMSU Simulation X. Wang NMSU,LANL, Saclay FEM M. Prokop LANL Sensor QA D. Winter/TBD Columbia, UNM, Czech FPHX QA R. Yarema FNAL, LANL Ancillary Service R. Pak BNL Disk Metrology S. Pate/PD NMSU Database D. Winter QA S. Butsyk LANL Cage Assembly S. Pate/PD NMSU Offline Hugo Pereira David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  6. FVTX Cost Estimate David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  7. Updated Costs in At Year dollars WBS item Base Cost Actual Cost Quoted Cost 1.4.1.2.1 sensor mask set $51.8k $67k 1.4.1.2.2 sensor prototype $25.9k $36.9k 1.4.1.3.1 production sensor $439.2k $381.5k 1.4.2.1,2 first FPHX prototype $0 $174k 1.4.3.2.1 HDI prototype $10.4 $30k 1.6 Final design drawings $67k $67k 1.6.3.3 production wedge backplane $146.8k $63k 1.6.4.3.5 cage tooling jig $10.7k $7.8k total $751.8 $374.9 $452.3 ($75.4) *Costs include burden and taxes David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  8. Funding and Spending Profiles David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  9. Project Manpower Fractional Cost Integrated over project 37% 37% 63% 63% David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  10. Estimated Manpower Ave Tech = $100k Ave Engineer = $200k From Workforce Spreadsheets- covers all scientists, and training for postdocs and students. U.S participants only. From FVTX Project File, does not include contract personnel David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  11. On Project Workforce Includes contract personnel David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  12. On Project M&S Costs David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  13. Risk Mitigation • Sensors - “standard” p-n diode, decades old technology - Mini-strips, minimize channel count, control occupancy - uses standard wire bonding techniques • HDI - not state-of-the-art, conforms to industry standards more complicated than previously expected, added electrical engineer, simulations • FPHX - based on previous successful chips - low power, simplifies mechanical designs, cooling system 1st prototype very successful • DAQ - not state-of-the-art, commercial components, easily integrates into PHENIX DAQ - ROC board is more complex, added expert ECAD designer, simulations • Mechanical – room temperature, low power, experienced team • Wedge - simple design due to low power, no chips on sensor • Cage and Disk - modular designs, not dependent on VTX - simplifies integration David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  14. FVTX Cost and Schedule Changes • Construction start – January 1, 2008 ( 2st QTR FY08) – Started April 1 • DOE Funding – FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 • Apr08 $500k $2400k $2000k • Added 4 ½ months float on critical path • 1st FPHX MOSIS delayed to June – FNAL designers needed more time • Delayed ROC/FEM start to FY2009 – due to funding • Sensor prototype start Jun08 – small changes and change in procurement • HDI prototype delays – designer availability David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  15. FVTX Cost &Schedule Issues and concerns • HDI prototype delays milestones for system tests and test with FPHX chip • HDI prototype is now on critical path • 4 week delay in FY2009 for funding start • FPHX engineer availability at FNAL David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  16. FVTX Schedule Calender years NOTE: Includes R&D Schedule Float 4 ½ months David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  17. FVTX Schedule delay Delayed by funding David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  18. FVTX Schedule Delay by funding David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  19. FVTX Schedule David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  20. FVTX Schedule David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  21. Current year Funding and Spending Profile David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  22. Current year Funding and Spending Profile David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  23. FVTX Component Production Start Dates • Sensor 2/11/09 11 months float* • FPHX 12/17/09 4 1/2 months float (on critical path) • HDI prototype 1/2/09 4 1/2 months float (on critical path) • ROC 10/1/09 6 months float* • FEM 10/1/09 3 months float* • Cage 6/1/09 9 months float* • Wedge 2/2/09 11 months float* • Disk 2/2/09 9 months float* * Float to critical path David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  24. FVTX Milestones David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  25. Cost Basis and Statusas of October 2008 David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  26. Summary • Mechanical 90% design complete • FPHX chip 1st prototype complete and successful • ROC FVTX board pre production prototype in design • FEM FVTX board pre production prototype in design • HDI prototype now critical issue • Cost Basis is in good shape • Construction and testing complete Nov 2011 • Construction Schedule points to FY 2012 as data run David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

  27. SummaryWBS No. 1.0 - Cost and Schedule • Cost $4.88M at year $ • R&D needed FPHX, HDI, DAQ • Cost Basis vendor quotes and Eng. Est. • Cost Contingency 26% • Schedule Start and Complete 04/01/2008 – 6/29/11 • Schedule Contingency risk based • Risk low (FPHX and HDI moderate) David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008

More Related