1 / 21

SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY

SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY. F e b r u a r y 2 0 0 7. Section 1 - Introduction. Addition of two new Plan Participants: Dixon Resource Conservation District (RCD) Dixon Regional Watershed JPA Change in the Plan Area Boundary 7,670 acres of Yolo County.

nira
Download Presentation

SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY F e b r u a r y 2 0 0 7

  2. Section 1 - Introduction • Addition of two new Plan Participants: • Dixon Resource Conservation District (RCD) • Dixon Regional Watershed JPA • Change in the Plan Area Boundary • 7,670 acres of Yolo County

  3. Section 2 – Project Description/Covered Activities • Update of land use conditions • Section 2.2: Updated the project descriptions and proposed land conversion maps (Figures 2-2 - 2-8). • Total Planned Development dropped from 20,260 to 16,910 acres (See Table 2-8). • New Development Projects • Development Agreements • Development in Travis Reserve Area removed as a Covered Activity. • Updated Covered Activities Zones • Zone 1: changes to urban limit lines for Dixon and Suisun • Zone 2: now includes SID potential annexation areas and service areas of new Plan Participants.

  4. Section 3 – Environmental Setting/Biological Resources • Update Covered Species list (went from 77 to 71 Covered Species). Species removed from the list were: • Ray less Ragwort (VP) • Streamside Daisy (ICR) • Brewer's Western flax (ICR) • Cooper’s Hawk (ICR) • Sharp-shinned Hawk (ICR) • Golden Eagle (ICR) • Added discussion of the Collinsville-Montezuma Hills Wind Resource Area to the Risk Analysis (Section 3.6)

  5. Section 4 – Conservation Analysis • Old Section 4 split into two sections: Conservation Analysis and Conservation Strategy. • Added flow diagram to provide an overview of the Conservation Analysis (Figure 4-1) • Moved Background Information and Conceptual Models to Appendix B. • Section previously known as the conservation approach for each NC was divided into 3 sections: • Key Conservation Elements (used in landscape level conservation analysis Section 4.4) • Conservation Areas (used in Section 5.0) • Reserve Design and Conservation Approach (Section 4.6)

  6. Section 4 – Conservation Analysis • Landscape Level Conservation Analysis. Changes to and additions of key conservation elements: • Major ridgelines connecting known Johnny jump-up and callippe silverspot butterfly occurrences buffered by 300 feet (Figure 4-13). • Burrowing owl records buffered by 1/3 of a mile. • We buffered the Swainson’s hawk nest records by a 1/4 of a mile instead of 2 miles to reflect nesting territories. • Removed the analysis combining the Risk Analysis (Section 3.0) and the Landscape Level Conservation Analysis (Section 4.4) (AKA: Priority Areas for Future Protection)

  7. Section 4 – Conservation Analysis • We expanded the Conservation Targets section (Section 4.5) and moved it to the end of the chapter. • Expanded the Reserve Design Section (Section 4.6): • Includes a more thorough discussion for each Natural Community • Outlines reserve design criteria specific to each natural community or Covered Species • Discussion of how the results of the Conservation Analysis are used to develop the Conservation Strategy (Section 5.0).

  8. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy • Section 5.1.1 Mitigation Standards • Provides more thorough definition of “Maximum Extent Practicable” and examples of how this working definition can be applied. • Provides a list of some of the standards and comparables for mitigation requirements. • Explanation of how the conservation and mitigation measures in the Solano HCP were derived by balancing the biological and conservation needs (i.e. from information in Appendix B and Section 4.0) with cost (when available), logistical, technological, and equity considerations from the Solano HCP MEP definition.

  9. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy • Goals and Objectives: • For each NC there are 2 goals, • 1st goal deals with preserving the general NC and contain a series of sub-goals, followed by objectives. • 2nd goal deals specifically with maintaining and protecting populations of the Covered Species and is followed by species specific objectives. • For Individual Species Sections (ex. CRLF or SWHA) • One main goal: to protect and maintain the ecological integrity of suitable habitats and promote the continued existence and expansion of the species within the Plan Area. • Followed by a series of Sub-Goals and Objectives.

  10. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy • Throughout Section 5.0 we have tried to consistently link the goals, objectives and conservation measures back to Section 4.0. Specifically to: • Reserve Design Criteria (Section 4.2) • Conservation Areas identified in Section (4.3) • Conservation Targets (Section 4.5) • Reserve Design and Conservation Approach (Section 4.6) • Summary Tables • Short summary tables at the end of each goals and objectives section, linking the goals with the reserve design principles, other conservation criteria from Section 4.0, objectives and conservation measures. • Long summary tables at end of Section 5.0 linking goals, objectives and conservation measures to: • Conservation Analysis (Section 4.0) • Adaptive Management and Monitoring Program (Section 6.0) • Plan Implementation (Section 9.0).

  11. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy Valley Floor Grassland and Vernal Pools • Anticipated preserve area dropped from between 11,000 to 15,000 acres to between 8,700 to 9,400 acres. (from decrease in planned development (See Sections 2.0 and 7.0). • Re-defined the species occurrences based on the definition in the Vernal Pool Recovery Plan, buffered by ¼ mile (this resulted in a decrease in the total number of occurrences for each species). • Revised and clarified High, Medium and Low Value Conservation Areas

  12. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy Valley Floor Grassland and Vernal Pools • We revised Conservation Measure VPG 8, Habitat Mitigation, to more closely reflect the Vernal Pool Recovery Plan. Key changes include: • Subareas 1A – 1F and 1I – 1L: 9:1 (mitigation: impact) preservation • Subareas 1G and 1H: 5.7:1 preservation (this decrease is a reflection of the 85% recovery goal for the Suisun Marsh Core Area). • 1:1 restoration in all categories (decreased from 2:1 in high value areas). This was based on cost considerations.

  13. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy Valley Floor Grassland and Vernal Pools • Modified Conservation Measure VPG 15: • Outlines Development Criteria for Core Contra Costa Goldfield Population Areas versus specific acreage limits as in version 2.1. • Added Conservation Measure VPG 16: • Adds additional restoration requirements to impacts to extant stands of Contra Costa Goldfields within Core Population Areas.

  14. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy • Inner Coast Range • Goals and objectives were left in, but are now optional • Conservation Measures were removed • Riparian, Stream and Freshwater Marsh Section: • More detailed avoidance and minimization measures. • Refinement of mitigation requirements (Conservation Measure RSM 11) based on the identification and refinement of Conservation Areas outlined in Section 4.0 • Additional Species-Specific objectives and conservation measures were added. • Giant Garter Snake • Habitat mitigation was added for certain areas within Rio Vista (Conservation Measure GGS 5), (required by USFWS for a recent project in Rio Vista) • Coastal Marsh • more detailed avoidance and minimization measures • more species-specific conservation measures.

  15. Section 5 – Conservation Strategy • Swainson’s Hawks: • Changes were made to the acceptable reserve areas (i.e. exclusion of the Collinsville-Montezuma Hills Wind Resource Area) • Removed the Tree Removal Conservation Measure and replaced it with a straight per acre impact fee to cover the cost of planting and protecting 1 potential nest tree for each acre of habitat lost. • Burrowing Owl • Updated reserve design criteria for agricultural areas: 1 acre of habitat per 80 acres of reserve land devoted to providing suitable nesting and cover habitat with at least 2 maintained burrow complexes.

  16. Section 6.0 - Adaptive Management and Monitoring • Added Section 6.3 and Figure 6-2 • Provides more detail on the structure of the adaptive management and monitoring program. • The portion to be implemented by SCWA over the entire Plan Area. • The portion to be implemented on individual reserves as a responsibility of mitigation banks and private project specific mitigation lands.

  17. Section 7.0 – Impact Assessment • Actual anticipated habitat loss from development dropped from approximately 18,000 acres to 13,000 acres. The decrease was due to: • New development projects • Development agreements • Removal of potential development within Travis Reserve. • The summary tables were divided into separate tables for each Natural Community to make them easier to read.

  18. Section 9.0 – Plan Implementation • Added more detail and clarification on Plan Governance and the Roles and Responsibilities of involved parties (Section 9.2) • Expanded the section on the development of the reserve system: • added more detail on reserve design criteria and reserve management. • The incorporation of pre-approved projects into the plan was added to the list of minor amendments.

  19. Appendix A - Routine Operational and Maintenance Activities • More detail was added to the type, location and frequency of operations and maintenance activities • Updated list of specific maintenance locations • Summary of facilities maintained by Plan Participants • Tables summarizing the Routine Operations and Maintenance Activities for each Plan Participant

  20. Appendix B - Natural Community and Species Accounts • Added Natural Community Accounts • Contain information on the background, distribution and associated Covered Species • The narrative conceptual models were incorporated into these accounts from the old version of Section 4.0. • The species accounts were reorganized based on their primary Natural Community association.

  21. Happy Reading!

More Related