1 / 20

SL ‘00

Antagonists in patients with previous poor ovarian response. Geoffrey H Trew Consultant in Reproductive Medicine & Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital Chief of Service, Imperial College NHS Trust London. SL ‘00. Poor responders………. Difficult group for ; Patients Staff Results. Definitions…….

nishan
Download Presentation

SL ‘00

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Antagonists in patients with previous poor ovarian response Geoffrey H Trew Consultant in Reproductive Medicine & Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital Chief of Service, Imperial College NHS Trust London SL ‘00

  2. Poor responders………. Difficult group for ; • Patients • Staff • Results

  3. Definitions……. • Main ; number of egg < 5, cancelled cycles But also a lot of American studies use ; • Raised FSH • Female age >40 • AFC < 5 • Endometriosis grade III or IV

  4. Variation The greater the number of protocols there are - the poorer the evidence for any particular one.....

  5. Evidence Based Medicine • Archie Cochrane • Do we need evidence ? • Why ? • What evidence do we have ?

  6. The evidence Or some of it ……

  7. Best outcome………… But…. There are other important outcomes as well ; • Egg collection • Embryo transfer

  8. Agonist v Antagonist • Cancellation Rates • Previous agonist cycle cancelled • New cycle – increased dose • Randomised to either agonist or antagonist

  9. Cancellation Rate on following cycle with poor responders 50 45 47.5 Brook…Trew, J Obstet & Gynecol, 2006 40 35 30 % 25 P=0.011 20 15 10 9.4 5 0 Antagonist Buserelin

  10. A Prospective RCT of microdose leuprolide v ganirelix …… • Pilot study - 48 pts • previous poor response • … ganirelix appears to be as effective as the microdose protocol and may be a superior choice in terms of cost and convenience Schmidt et al Fertil steril May 2005

  11. Antagonists in IVF poor responders – results of randomised trial • Antagonist v standard long ; 60 pts Antagonist group ; • less drugs P = 0.0001 • more eggs P = 0.02 • Fewer cycles cancelled • PR 17% per ET v 7% per ET Marci et al RBM Online Aug 2005

  12. Flexible GnRH Antagonistv flare up GnRH Agonist in poor responders…a RCT • 5 or less oocytes with dose = or > 300iu • Antagonist (180pts) v flare agonist (90pts) • PR ; 12.2% v 4.4% ( p<0.048) Lainas…Kolibianakis, et al : Hum Reprod April 2008

  13. Poor responders • Just about every different protocol tried • Different FSH doses • Different Agonist doses • Antagonists fixed / flexible • Various additives inc LH growth hormone etc • ‘Soft’ / Natural protocols • Still poor results!

  14. What is your preferred ovarian stimulation regime for “poor responders” ? • Clomifene/ gonadotrophin 26% • Ultrashort agonist 23% • Short agonist 30% • Long agonist 17% • Antagonist 58% (Serono Symposia Mtg Athens Dec 2006)

  15. What is your preferred ovarian stimulation dose for “poor responders” • 200 iu 2% • 225 iu 4% • 300 iu 21% • 375 iu 9% • 450 iu 47% • > 450 iu 15%

  16. What should the maximum FSH dose be in poor responders ? • “ little or no clinical benefit in doses > 300 iu” • “…but costs and side effects were higher” Siristatidis & Hamilton, J Obstet Gynecol May 2007

  17. Other options • Give up / expectant management • Corrective surgery of underlying problem • Natural cycle IVF • IUI - If no significant male factor / tubal factor • IUI and donor sperm if significant male factor • Egg Donation • 50% + pregnancy rates

  18. Conclusions • Difficult group to treat • Poor pregnancy rates in true poor responders • Antagonist protocols • High dose of FSH

  19. Please ! • Do not use antagonists just for poor responders use them for all groups of patients !! • Results are good • Patients love them !

  20. Thank You ! g.trew@imperial.ac.uk

More Related