1 / 14

Linwood E. Howe Elementary School

Learn about Lin Howe Elementary School's Title I Program, its goals, instructional priorities, and interventions to improve student achievement in ELA and math. Explore the strengths, weaknesses, and next steps of the program. Evaluation and parental involvement policies are also discussed.

noguera
Download Presentation

Linwood E. Howe Elementary School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Linwood E. HoweElementary School Culver City Unified School District Culver City, CA

  2. What Does Title I Mean and How Did Lin Howe Qualify? • Under NCLB of 2001 SWP (research) • at least 40% of population on free/reduced lunch • Application process including a School-wide plan (updated annually)

  3. Student Groups(Percent of Total Student Population)

  4. Budgets • Title I (about $65,00 allocation for 2008-09) • Instructional Aides • Professional Development • Technology • Intervention Programs • Language! • Reading and Math Academies (pre-teaching) • Viking Club (re-teaching) • SI • Instructional Aides • Supplemental Instructional Materials/Hardware • Professional Development • ELAP • Supplemental Instructional Materials (4th and 5th grade) • Language! (4th and 5th Grade ELL supplemental texts) • AB 1802 • Language! • Open Court Training and materials

  5. What Does Our Program Look Like?

  6. Instructional Priorities Where We Are • Approx. 47% of students tested on CST are scoring at levels below proficient in ELA (2008) • Approx. 53% of Socioeconomically disadvantaged students tested on CST are scoring at levels below proficient in ELA (2008) • Goals: increase achievement in ELA and close the achievement gap in all subgroups • Focus on ELA

  7. Closing the Achievement Gap

  8. Socioeconomically Disadvantaged- Language Arts Percent of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced Language Arts

  9. Socioeconomically Disadvantaged- Math Percent of Students Performing at Proficient or Advanced Math

  10. “Language!” A Comprehensive Literacy Curriculum • Strengths • Supplements students’ grade-level instruction • Accelerates learning for a wide range of underperforming students including ELL’s and Special Education • Based on brain research • Addresses multiple modalities and is interactive and engaging • Fills in the “gaps” • Weaknesses • Limited number of teachers trained and teaching($) • Challenges • Can only run program before/after school • Only available for grades 3-5 • Student attendance • Next Steps • Assess student progress (using Galileo and CST) and evaluate success • Increase the number of students served • Find a parallel program for grades K-2

  11. Other Interventions • Math and Reading Academy • Based on classroom and benchmark assessment- teacher recommendation (pre-teach) • ELD Comprehension Workshop • Small group ELD instruction (supplementing regular ELD instruction) • Viking Club • After School Intervention (re-teach) • CCUSD Summer School • Intervention • ELD • Special Education

  12. Evaluation of the Title I Program • School Site Plan revision • School-wide survey

  13. Student-Teacher-Parent Compactand Parental Involvement Policies • Student-Teacher-Parent Compact • Parental Involvement Policy

  14. Questions?

More Related