1 / 6

Input GPSRO data tests with WRFDA

CWB and AFWA project 2010. Input GPSRO data tests with WRFDA. Yong-Run Guo NCAR/MMM, 12 November 2010. Different GPSRO input format to WRFDA. wetPfr (netCDF) => profile_LITTLE_R ( CWB OP211 ) 100 m vertical resolution, profile by profile bfrPrf (BUFR) => profile_LITTLE_R ( NCAR )

odelia
Download Presentation

Input GPSRO data tests with WRFDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CWB and AFWA project 2010 Input GPSRO data tests with WRFDA Yong-Run Guo NCAR/MMM, 12 November 2010

  2. Different GPSRO input format to WRFDA wetPfr (netCDF) => profile_LITTLE_R (CWB OP211) 100 m vertical resolution, profile by profile bfrPrf (BUFR) => profile_LITTLE_R (NCAR) about 200 m vertical resolution, profile by profile bfrPrf (BUFR) => one_level_per_record LITTLE_R (GSI BUFR) about 200 m vertical resolution, level by level, Considering the ray-smearing Case: 2009060818Z WRFDA with H-correction+P-perturbation-off Assimilation of GPSRO data only

  3. wetPrf (OP211) and BUFR (NCAR) bfrPrf wetPrf bfrPrf - wetPrf Max and min increments at h = 0.55

  4. Remarks • There are differences in all of the analysis increment fields. • The biggest differences are in the moisture increments field over tropic area. • wetPrf data and bfrPrf data have not only the different vertical resolutions but also the different height levels.

  5. bfrPrf profile (upright) and single levels (ray-smearing) bfrPrf_1LVL bfrPrf bfrPrf_1LVL-bfrPrf Max and min increments at h = 0.55

  6. Remarks • There are differences in all of the analysis increment fields. • The biggest differences are in the temperature in north of the Tibetan plateau. The differences of the moisture increments field located in Yunnan province of China. • bfrPrf “one_level_per_record” and “profile” data not only consider the ray-smearing but also have the different QC procedure. Later has Poli’s check in QC, but former does not. • If CWB has the manpower available, it may be worth to conduct more tests.

More Related