1 / 25

Differential Response System Update

Differential Response System Update. Presentation to: Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council Presenter: Jo Ann Lamm, MSW Date: August 5, 2014. Updates Include:. What is the status nationally of Differential Response (DR)?

ophira
Download Presentation

Differential Response System Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Differential Response System Update Presentation to: Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council Presenter: Jo Ann Lamm, MSW Date: August 5, 2014

  2. Updates Include: • What is the status nationally of Differential Response (DR)? • The Georgia Experience with Differential Response since 2004- (Analysis in 2010) • The impact, benefits and challenges of Differential Response • Recommendations • Successes/challenges/opportunities ahead?

  3. What is Differential Response? • DR is an approach that allows for more than one way to respond to screened–in CPS reports of child maltreatment • Typically recognizes two tracks/responses - “Investigative or IR” and “Family Assessment or Alternative Response (AR)” • Assignment is based on an array of factors( type and severity of alleged maltreatment, number and sources of prior reports, age of child, risk and safety levels) • DR is a well organized CPS system that is supported by legislation, and/or State policies, procedures and protocols

  4. Similarities Between the Two Responses… • Focus on child safety is paramount • Promotes family engagement when possible • Recognizes CPS authority to make decisions about risk and safety, removal, out of home placement and service provision • Recognition that other community partners may be the more appropriate service providers

  5. National Differential Response Implementation… • 19 States and DC are using DR statewide • At least 7 additional States, tribes or jurisdictions are considering planning implementation of DR • Multiple evaluations have been conducted • Most recent evaluation by QIC-DR on Illinois, Colorado and Ohio July 2014

  6. Themes/Findings from Multiple Evaluations … • Child safety is paramount and not compromised with either response • Improved family engagement • Rate of subsequent repeat CPS reports have decreased • Enhanced family and CPS staff satisfaction • Increased community involvement • Prompt services delivery • Family participation in decision making increased • Cost effectiveness

  7. QIC-DR Evaluation: Posed Three Questions… • Are children as safe or safer in AR than children in investigative response (IR)? • How is AR different in terms of family engagement, caseworker practice and services provided from IR? • What are the costs to implement DR?

  8. QIC-DR Findings… • In 2 of the 3 sites, AR families were less likely to be re-referred • Fewer than 5% of children either AR or IR were removed during the 1 year study • AR families were more likely to receive services such as social support, educational, parenting and other services while IR families more likely to receive substance abuse services • In 1 site AR families received services more rapidly • In 2 sites AR parents felt 1st meeting was more positive; IR families worried more at 1st meeting • In 1 site AR families were satisfied with treatment by CPS, the level of help received and likelihood of contacting caseworker in the future • Costs varied

  9. Georgia’s DR Experience from 2004 to 2010 : Themes from Practice Analysis… • Lack of statewide policy; lack of consistent or uniform criteria of practice- unknown expectations of what is acceptable Diversion/Family Support practice • Data Integrity Issues • Distrust of Agency • Varying use of the word Diversion/criteria for assignment to Diversion

  10. Impact, Benefits and Challenges… Differential Response restructures the entire CPS system: from casework foundation, training, supervision, coaching and practice

  11. National Impact and Benefits … • DR influences how all aspects of CPS are implemented and delivered • It is difficult to determine the sole impact of DR due to states implementing other practice reforms simultaneously • Family engagement practice strategies influence how all CPS staff approach families

  12. National Impact and Benefits… • Improved assessments • Absence of labeling may positively impact the relationship between CPS, partners and families • Substantiation rates increase • ACF guidance emphasizes family engagement • Innovative approaches-a third prevention track and community providers assume case responsibility

  13. Challenges… • Leadership Influence • Buy-in and ownership by Drivers • Agreement on Vision, Mission and Values • Need strong practice foundation prior to DR • DR Design: Systemic Re-structuring of Infrastructure- statewide policy, training, technical assistance, on-going consultation, local supervision and casework practice

  14. Challenges… • Implementation Variability • Implementation Inconsistencies • Communication Plan • Examine Caseloads • Limited Resources • Identify training needs for CPS staff, supervisors, agency leadership and community partners

  15. Challenges… • Ensure efficient use of DR and model fidelity • Allow for switching tracks/responses • Track and explain changes in data • On-going need for coaching, assessing and revisions based on observations/data • CQI/Evaluation

  16. Recommendations… Positive Steps and Actions…

  17. Positive Steps DFCS has taken… • Development of statewide DR/Family Support policy and guidance • Centralized Intake • Statewide Intake Policy • Work in past with ACCWIC and NRCCPS to address safety- implemented Safety Response System • 2 Pilot sites are using Family Functioning Assessment process • Other?

  18. Recommendations… • Clarity of Vision, Mission and Values that supports a strong CPS casework foundation • Develop strategic plan that addresses what needs to be accomplished to ensure good case work practice • Address the core concerns of child safety and risk

  19. Recommendations… • Assess and address caseload size for success • Ensure appropriate resources • Streamline DR model and Safety Response System- Is there consensus on the use and how DR/Family Support and Safety Response System “fit’ together? • Fully implement DR and ensure accountability to model

  20. Recommendations… • Family Support Policy must be followed and implemented consistently across the state • Was policy developed with counties and partners? • Ensure adequate and on-going training that supports foundation first and holds true to DR model fidelity for caseworkers, supervisors and agency leadership

  21. Recommendations… • Determine role of State DFCS in accountability • Develop communication strategies to keep counties and partners informed of practice • Build an infrastructure to guarantee sustainability from the beginning • Build in a CQI process and an Evaluation

  22. Questions… • What are the desired outcomes? • How do you get there? • What are the gains and losses? • What’s working well? • What are the successes/challenges/opportunities ahead?

  23. References • National Quality Improvement Center on Differential Response in Child Protective Services. (2014, July).Final Report: QIC-DR Cross Site Evaluation. www.differentialresponseqic.org • Center for Child and Family Policy(2006,June). Multiple Response System Evaluation report to NCDSS, Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University. www.ncdhhs.gov/dss/publications • Child Welfare Information 242424Gateway. www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/issue_briefs/differential_response.

  24. References… • Lamm, JA.(2010).Differential Response System Implementation in Georgia.jalamm56@earthlink.net

More Related