1 / 15

LS1 Days Report from Vacuum , Surfaces and Coatings (VSC) group Technology Department (TE)

LS1 Days Report from Vacuum , Surfaces and Coatings (VSC) group Technology Department (TE) José Miguel JIMENEZ. Main topics. LS1 coordination TE-VSC Plan Items Implications for TE-VSC Impacts to other Groups TE-VSC Group contributions Resource status Closing remarks.

orea
Download Presentation

LS1 Days Report from Vacuum , Surfaces and Coatings (VSC) group Technology Department (TE)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LS1 DaysReport from Vacuum, Surfacesand Coatings (VSC) groupTechnology Department (TE) José Miguel JIMENEZ TE-VSC

  2. Main topics • LS1 coordination • TE-VSC Plan Items • Implications for TE-VSC • Impacts to other Groups • TE-VSC Group contributions • Resource status • Closing remarks TE-VSC

  3. LS1 CoordinationTE-VSC Structure (June’12)

  4. LS1 CoordinationName of Contact Persons in TE-VSC TE-VSC

  5. TE-VSC Plan itemsImplications for TE-VSC (1/2) • 161 Plan Items entered (2012-06-09 @ 21:54) • 17need ECRs #Items % • P0 14 8.7 • P1 6137.9 • P2 40 24.8 • P3 42 26.1 • P4 4 2.5 • P0+P1+P2 represent 71%of the requests • LHC represents 50% of the requests • Status in plan.cern.ch • 91involve only TE-VSC • 70require support from other groups TE-VSC

  6. TE-VSC Plan itemsImplications for TE-VSC (2/2) • Manpower • 50FTEs required (TE-VSC) #FTE % • P0 8.7 17.9 • P1 22.245.5 • P2 8.0 16.5 • P3 9.1 18.8 • P4 0.6 1.3 • P0+P1+P2 represent 80% of theTE-VSC Manpower • LHC represent 40% of the TE-VSC Manpower TE-VSC

  7. TE-VSC Plan itemsImpact to other groups • 161Plan Items entered (2012-06-09 @ 21:54) • 70need support from other groups #Items % • P0 Total 4 5.7 • P1 Total 31 44.3 • P2 Total 17 24.3 • P3 Total 16 22.9 • P4 Total 2 2.9 • 10Groups are asked to support TE-VSC #Items % • EN-EL 40 42.6 • BE-ABP 13 13.8 • EN-MME 13 13.8 • EN-HE 12 12.8 • TE-MSC 4 4.3 • DGS-RP 4 4.3 • EN-MEF 3 3.2 • TE-CRG 2 2.1 • EN-CV 2 2.1 • BE-BI 1 1.1 • Status in plan.cern.ch • 3 “Yes” completed • 5 “pending” • 62 “Not filled” TE-VSC

  8. TE-VSC Plan itemsImpact to othergroups: EN-EL case Summary by Accelerators Summary by Accelerators • 20% (614 cables) correspondto the needs for newprojects • 16% correspond to P3 • 34% if cumulated • Replacement of electrical“reglettes” are counted ascables TE-VSC

  9. TE-VSC Group contributions • 145Group contributions received (2012-06-09 @ 21:54) • Ratio by priorities could not be extracted from the tool (important) • 8 Groups are requesting TE-VSC Support #Items % FTE • TE-ABT 36 25 3.5 • BE-RF 34 23 4.1 • BE-BI 28 19 3.2 • EN-STI 26 18 2.8 • BE-ABP 10 7 1.5 • BE-CO 5 3 0.2 • TE-MSC 5 3 0.6 • TE-CRG 1 1 0.2 • Status in plan.cern.ch • 13 “Not filled” checking with requesters • 32 “pending” more detailed needed to complete the filling • 100 “Yes” completed • Resources involved • Manpower: 16 FTEs (excluding support at the surface: vacuum acceptance tests) • Material budget required: 0.5 MCHF(outside the current agreements) TE-VSC

  10. TE-VSC Resource statusManpower availabilities: CERN Staffs & Fellows • 59 VSC Staff deployed in all accelerators from Jan’13 to end March’14 • 15 in the Injectors • 30in the LHC • 14for the Surface treatments & Coatings support Then Injector’s Staff partlyredeployed in the LHC activities as from Feb’14 Engineers Technical Technicians & Physicists Engineers • IVM: 2 1 8 • LBV 3 4 6 • EIV 4 2 6 • ICM 2 3 4 • SCC 2 2 10 • 5 Fellows • 1 in the Injectors • 4 in the LHC 2013 2014 • Controls 1 1 • LHC BV 2 2 • LHC Exp. Areas 1 1 • LHC IV 1 1 TE-VSC

  11. TE-VSC Resource statusManpower availabilities: IS & Collaborations Summary by IS/FSU/PJAS • 57External Support is based on: • 23AL40-30 mainly for LHC activities: mechanics, venting/pump-downsand bake-out installations 2013 2014 • LHC BV 11 11 • LHC IV 10 10 • Injectors 2 2 • 18FSUs for all activities: mechanics, controls, surface treatments, logistics andbake-out installations 2013 2014 • LHC BV 4 4 • LHC PIMs/Exp 2 2 • Controls 8 4.5 • Surface treat. 3.5+2? 3.5+2? • 12Collaboration: vacuum consolidation related to PIMs and Controls 2013 2014 • LHC BV 6 (PL) 6 (PL) 1+1? (ES) 1+1? (ES) • Controls 5 (PL) 5 (PL) • 4 USAS 2013 2014 • Portugal 2 1 • Spain 2 2 TE-VSC

  12. TE-VSC Resource statusMaterial Summary by priorities Summary by Accelerators Material cost 23.8 MCHF (procurements…) LHC represent 66% P3 represent 19% TE-VSC

  13. Closing remarks (1/3) • The ideal sequence would be: • For the arcs • Pre-installation of mobile pumps (sub-sectors with leaks) • Venting to speed up the warming-up • Leak detections • Follow-up of the trains for PIMs & relief valves installation • “independent” schedule for RF ball & rupture disk installations • For the LSS • Venting and removal of equipment belonging to other groups • TE-VSC consolidations • Installation of equipment (coming back or new) • Pump downs and bake-out installations • Bake-out and NEG activations • Removal of vacuum bake-out and cleaning TE-VSC

  14. Closing remarks (2/3)Optimisation of TE-VSC activities… Venting LHC IV Removing equipment TE-VSC consolidations Equipment back Pump down & bake-out inst. Bake-out & NEC activ. TE-VSC

  15. Closing remarks (3/3) • TE-VSC was aware of all most relevant activities • Contacts taken since months with Groups so no big surprises seen in Plan.cern.ch • 121 people (59 Staffs + 5 Fellows + 57 External Support) are required to execute all activities • Schedule issues in LSS5, 6, 7 and 8 • Need a careful preparation with Katy • Material (mobile pumps, bake-out) & co-activities to be analyzed • Budget issues for P3 activities • TE-VSC to revise the impact of LS1 day decisions • Feedback to EN-EL on impact to the communicated DICs • Decrease of the number of cables requested TE-VSC

More Related