1 / 52

Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS

Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS. George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org George.sugai@uconn.edu. Purpose. RtI & SWPBS & sustaining change:

otto
Download Presentation

Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sustaining Change:RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org George.sugai@uconn.edu

  2. Purpose RtI & SWPBS & sustaining change: • Promoting effective, efficient, & relevant teaching & learning environments • Working from continuum of behavior support for all students • Building capacity for adoption & sustained Implementation of evidence-based practices

  3. Sustaining Change • Know your basics • Implement with fidelity • Give priority to what matters • Know your outcomes • Integrate for efficiency • Build durable capacity

  4. Questions

  5. Who is he?

  6. www.pbis.org

  7. 7138 schools across 45 states (3/08) Over 110,000 public schools…..6.4%!!

  8. www.cber.org

  9. What is RtI? Basics

  10. RtI

  11. RtI: Good “IDEiA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators • NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention • NOT limited to special education • NOT new

  12. Quotable Fixsen • “Policy is • Allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs” • Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” • “Training does not predict action” • “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications”

  13. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  14. Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Behavioral Systems 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90%

  15. RtI Application Examples

  16. Responsiveness to InterventionAcademic+ Social Behavior

  17. RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Few Some All Dec 7, 2007

  18. Questions to Ponder • What is “scientifically/evidence-based” intervention/practice? • How do we measure & ensure “fidelity of implementation?” • How do we determine “non-responsiveness?” • Can we affect “teacher practice?” • Do we have motivation to increase efficiency of “systems” organization? • ???

  19. What is SWPBS?

  20. Implementation Levels State District School Classroom Student

  21. Behaviorism SWPBS Conceptual Foundations ABA PBS SWPBS

  22. SW-PBS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

  23. SWPBS is about….

  24. WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT PREVENTING VIOLENCE? • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • High rates of academic & socialsuccess • Formal social skills instruction • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Positive adult role models • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort

  25. Basics: 4 PBS Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

  26. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  27. CONTINUUM of SWPBS • TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP • Special Education Audit Identify existing practices by tier Specify outcome for each effort Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes Establish decision rules (RtI) ~5% ~15% • SECONDARY PREVENTION • Check in/out • Targeted social skills instruction • Peer-based supports • Social skills club • PRIMARY PREVENTION • Teach & encourage positive SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline • Effective instruction • Parent engagement ~80% of Students

  28. SWPBS Subsystems School-wide Classroom Family Non-classroom Student

  29. School-wide 1. Common purpose & approach to discipline 2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation

  30. Non-classroom • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff • Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement

  31. Classroom • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cuestaught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum

  32. Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations

  33. Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources

  34. Who does SWPBS look like?

  35. Redesign Learning & Teaching Environment School Rules NO Food NO Weapons NO Backpacks NO Drugs/Smoking NO Bullying

  36. Saying & doing it “Positively!” Keep off the grass!

  37. LC: Expectations & behavioral skills are taught & recognized in natural context

  38. Expectations & behavioral skills are taught & recognized in natural context TEACHING MATRIX Expectations

  39. Acknowledge & Recognize

  40. SWPBS Outcomes?

  41. Pre Post

  42. 05% 20% 11% 22% 84% 58% SWPBS schools are more preventive

  43. Mean Proportion of Students 3% 8% 89% 10% 16% 74% 11% 18% 71% ODR rates vary by level K=6 (N = 1010) 6-9 (N = 312) 9-12 (N = 104)

  44. A few kids get many ODRs 32% 43% 25% 48% 37% 15% 45% 40% 15% K-6 (N = 1010) 6-9 (N = 312) 9-12 (N = 104)

  45. Fairbanks, Sugai, Gardino, & Lathrop, 2007. Class B Results Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior School Days

  46. Class B Results + Composite Peers Peer Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior Peer Peer School Days

More Related