1 / 17

Expanding our view of Associations

Expanding our view of Associations. Edwin Guthrie. Edwin Ray Guthrie. Seattlite from 1886-1959 Most important work: The Psychology of Learning (1935) Remember Skinner’s book is 1938 Great writer and teacher Wrote for average student, not mathematician or theorist Embodied parsimony

pabla
Download Presentation

Expanding our view of Associations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Expanding our view of Associations Edwin Guthrie

  2. Edwin Ray Guthrie • Seattlite from 1886-1959 • Most important work: The Psychology of Learning (1935) • Remember Skinner’s book is 1938 • Great writer and teacher • Wrote for average student, not mathematician or theorist • Embodied parsimony • Embraced applications of psychology

  3. Major theoretical concepts • The One Law of Learning: :Law of contiguity • a combination of stimuli which has accompanied a movement will, on its recurrence, tend to be followed by that movement. • (was wrong, though- so don’t get too excited) • Revised: “What is being noticed becomes a signal for what is being done”

  4. One trial learning and The Recency principle • One Trial learning: • Completely rejects law of frequency as learning principle • A stimulus pattern gains its full associative strength on the occasion of its first pairing with a response • Do you agree? • Recency Principle: • Response performed last in presence of set of stimuli will be that which will be done when that stimulus next recurs. • Why might this be better supported?

  5. Movement-produced stimuli • Movement-produced stimuli: stimuli which are caused by movements of the body • E.g., muscle, bone movements • Movements of even visceral muscles • Responses can be conditioned to them • Notice contiguity is between movement produced stimuli and behavior rather than between stimuli and behavior • Allows for some ‘covert’ events • One of first to recognize that internal events may be conditioned

  6. Practice improve performance? • Differentiates between acts and movements: • Movement: simple muscle contractions • Acts: large number of movements • Associations formed between movements • One trial • All or none • Acts take longer: • Stringing together movements • Learning an act is more complex: must chain together movements • Skills: • Combinations of many acts • Take even longer • More complex • So what is reinforcement? • Mechanical arrangement: changes the stimulating conditions and thereby prevents unlearning • Ties last response to an event • Was contiguity not a contingency or predictability that was important

  7. Guthrie-Horton Experiment • Modified puzzle box: • Large number of cats • Each cat learned to escape in own unique way • But: last response before escape = unique one • Then repeated this the next time: • stereotyped behavior • Often ignored food reinforcer • (but was escape or food the reinforcer?)

  8. Guthrie-Horton Experiment • Forgetting: • Forgetting = alternative behavior occurred in presence of stimulus pattern • Once alternative behavior occurs, is repeated, thus forget old one • All old learning must have once involve new learning • Retroactive inhibition: knocks out old learning • Notice that forgetting is an ACTIVE process

  9. How to Break Habits! • Habit = response that has become associated with large number of stimuli • Must break relationship with those stimuli • Find the cues that initiate bad habits and practice another response in presence of those stimuli • Threshold method: • introduce stimulus at weak strengths that not cause response, then gradually increase • “horse gentling or horse whispering” • Fatigue Method: • Wear the response out • “breaking the horse” • Satiation methods • If your dog gets into the garbage- tie the garbage around its neck- it will grow tired of the smell and avoid the garbage • Incompatible response method • Engage in the opposite or incompatible behavior in presence of the stimulus • You can’t both stand up and sit down • Remember- this was suggested in 1930s and 1940s…..no ABA yet!

  10. Sidetracking vs. breaking habits • Breaking: get rid of stimulus-response association • Sidetracking: avoiding cues that elicit undesirable behavior • E.g., with individuals in recovery: • Avoid stimuli which elicit feelings of craving • Avoid eliciting conditions (stress, family, etc.) • Make new friends and MOVE!

  11. Guthries’ views on punishment: • Effectiveness of a punishment is determined by what it causes the punished organism to do • Punishment changes way the individual responds to certain stimuli • Changes behavior because elicits incompatible response • Slap dog on nose vs. rear when car-chasing • Rear: makes it run more • Nose: makes it stop • Critical that punishment applied in presence of stimuli that elicited punished behavior • If punishment does not elicit incompatible response and not applied in presence of eliciting stimuli, it may even strengthen the undesired response

  12. Drive, intention and transfer of training • Drives: Physiological drives = maintaining stimuli that keep organism active until goal is reached • Hunger elicits internal stimulation that continues until hunger is sated. • (Unfortunately, data not support this: we stop eating before we feel sated!) • Problem with addiction: not getting satiety signals • But: eat because you are anxious: • Feel anxious = cue to eat • Eating reduces anxiety • Thus eating is reinforced: last thing you did before anxiety went away • Intentions: Responses that conditioned to maintaining stimuli • Maintaining stimulation from a drive lasts until drive reduced • Sequence of behavior preceding drive-reducing response is repeated next time drive stimuli occur, thus interrelated • Thus learn behavior that associated with drive reduction • Transfer of training • Did not believe that there was much transfer of training • Did emphasis situational and contextual cues: study where you will take your test • We learn what we do in presence of specific stimuli!

  13. Voek: Formalized Guthrie’s theory • Guthrie did not test his theories: why? • Bolles: Guthrie minimized roles of motivation and reinforcement • Carlson: no grad students available for research • Guthrie: stated principles were too general to test • Virginia Voeks: 1921-1989 • Guthrie’s student • 1947 dissertation from Yale • Restated Guthrie’s theory into principles and postulations

  14. Voek’s model • Postulate I: Principle of Association: • Any stimulus pattern that once accompanies a response or immediately precedes it by >1/2 sec becomes full-strength direct cue for that response • only way in which stimulus patterns not now cues for a particular response can become direct cue for that response • Postulate II: Principle of Postremity • A S+ that has accompanied or immediately preceded 2 or more incompatible responses is a conditioned S+ only for last response made (in which S+ was present) • Only way for stimulus that is currently a cue for a particular response to be extinguished (move it so it’s not last!)

  15. Voek’s model • Postulate III: Principle of Response Probability • Probability of any particular response occurring at some specified time is a function of proportion of the stimuli present which are at the time cues for that response. • More stimulus cues present = greater chance of behavior • Postulate IV: Principle of Dynamic Situations: • stimulus-pattern of situation is not static • Is modified from time to time • Modified due to changes as result from subject making a response: • Accumulation of fatigue products • Visceral changes or other internal processes • Introduction of controlled or uncontrolled variations in stimuli present

  16. Critique • Positives: • Unique in emphasis on contiguity (and mostly wrong) • Could explain learning, extinction, generalization with simple analysis • Important alternative • Many clinical applications (was right for wrong reasons) • Important for education: emphasized importance of training generalization and discrimination • Negatives: • Too parsimonious • No data • Untestable • Contiguity idea shown later to be wrong

More Related