1 / 17

Political Parties

11. Political Parties. Brendan Smialowski/GettyImages. The Development of Political Parties, 1800–1824. 11.1. Ratification of the U.S. Constitution Federalists supported strong central government Election of 1800 Washington warned against the evils of political parties.

paigew
Download Presentation

Political Parties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 11 Political Parties Brendan Smialowski/GettyImages

  2. The Development of Political Parties, 1800–1824 11.1 • Ratification of the U.S. Constitution • Federalists supported strong central government • Election of 1800 • Washington warned against the evils of political parties. • Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-Republicans) versus John Adams (Federalist) • Jefferson became the first president elected as the nominee of a political party but was opposed to a party system. • Saw his party as temporary, to defeat Adams, and as a result his party never gained wide-spread popularity

  3. Jacksonian Democracy, 1824–1860 11.1 • Federalists faded by 1820 • Era of Good Feeling • James Monroe (1817-1825) • Party competition was nearly non-existent at national level • Huge electorate growth & party development at state level • Whigs and Democrats • Gave the United States the first broadly-supported two-party system in the Western World

  4. The Golden Age, 1860–1932 11.1 • Republicans replaced Whigs • Formed by anti-slavery activists • Party Stability • Characterized by the dominance of party organizations • Era from end of Reconstruction until reforms of the Progressive Era • Political Machines • Organizations that use tangible incentives such as jobs and favors to win loyalty among voters • Provided upward social mobility

  5. The Modern Era (1900-1930) 11.1 • Elections and social services changes • Ballot printing, other elections duties handled by government instead of parties • Roosevelt's New Deal put social services in hands of government, not parties. • Candidate-centered politics • Shift to focus on candidates, their issues, and character rather than on party affiliation

  6. Citizen Support & Party Realignment 11.1 • Party realignments • Dramatic shifts in partisan preference that drastically alter the political landscape • Existing party affiliations subject to upheaval • Critical elections • May polarize voters around new issues or personalities • 1. Jefferson against strong central govt (1800) • 2. Republicans anti-slavery (1860) • 3. Great Depression shift from Rep to Dem (1932) • Secular realignments • More gradual shifts in party coalitions • S. Dem states shifting towards Rep (late 1980’s-early 1990’s)

  7. The National Party 11.2 • The national chairperson • Often selected by president or newly nominated presidential candidate • Chief fundraiser and spokesperson • The national committee • Coordinates national convention and presidential campaign • Democratic National Committee (DNC) • Republican National Committee (RNC)

  8. The National Convention 11.2 • Every four years • Present a positive image of the candidate • Serve as pep rallies • Delegates • Formerly selected by party leaders, now often elected in primary elections and caucuses • Superdelegates • Allow Democratic Party some control

  9. State and Local Parties 11.2 • Roots of the party • Virtually all government regulation of political parties is handled by the states. • Vast majority of party leadership positions are held at state and local level. • Precinct • Smallest voting unit • Fundamental building block of the party • State executive committee

  10. Activities of American Political Parties 11.3 • Running Candidates for Office • Formulating and Promoting Policy • Organizing Government • Furthering Unity, Linkage, and Accountability

  11. Running Candidates for Office 11.3 • Raising money • Well-developed networks of donors • Raise money and disseminate it to candidates • Mobilizing support and getting out the vote • Public opinion polls and tracking surveys • Create TV advertisements • "Get out the vote" Election Day activities

  12. Formulating and Promoting Policy 11.3 • National Party Platform • Most visible instrument used to formulate, convey, and promote public policy • Each party develops a lengthy platform outlining its positions. • About two-thirds of the winning party's platform tends to be enacted. • About one-half of the losing party's platform tends to be enacted.

  13. Organizing Government 11.3 • Parties in Congress • Party members in Congress select congressional leaders. • Those congressional leaders hold enormous power. • The presidential party • President is informal party leader • Parties in the federal courts • Parties in state government

  14. The Formation and Role of Minor Parties 11.5 • Obstacles • Transitioning from social movement to party is difficult • Minor parties have had influence • Dixiecrats • Green Party

  15. Barriers to Minor-Party Success 11.5 • Public Financing Rules for Campaigns • Two parties create financing rules at state and national level to protect themselves and prevent 3rd party runs. • Winner-take-all system • Party that receives at least one more vote wins the election

  16. Causes of Polarization 11.6 • Geographic divide • "The United States of Canada" to the north • "Jesusland" to the south • Stereotypes of political identifiers • Republicans as NASCAR • Democrats as Starbucks • Wedge issues • "Guns, God, and gays" • Abortion, gay marriage

  17. Consequences of Polarization 11.6 • Congress • Least productive in history • Lack of moderates, lower incentive to compromise • Consequences to electorate • Forcing moderate electorate to choose between extremes may increase voter apathy

More Related