1 / 17

Disability and Voluntarism 1965 - 1995 – an effective force in policy making?

Disability and Voluntarism 1965 - 1995 – an effective force in policy making?. Gareth Millward. Aims. Determine what “disability” meant in government Understand the interaction between government and voluntary organisations

pancho
Download Presentation

Disability and Voluntarism 1965 - 1995 – an effective force in policy making?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Disability and Voluntarism 1965 - 1995 – an effective force in policy making? Gareth Millward

  2. Aims • Determine what “disability” meant in government • Understand the interaction between government and voluntary organisations • Assess how new political ideas outside the establishment were accepted or rejected – assimilated or disregarded

  3. Simplified Timeline 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 DIG Rights Now! DA CCD RADAR BCRD UPIAS BCODP Spastics Society SCOPE Disabled Persons Act Disabled Persons (SCaR) Act Disabled Persons (Employment) Act 1944 CS & Disabled Persons Act Disability Discrimination Act International Year of Disabled People OPCS Survey Civil Rights Bills SJC CORAD Disability Working and Living Allowances Personal Capacity Assessments New invalidity benefits

  4. The social model of disability • UPIAS’s Fundamental Principles (1974) • Disabled People’s International and BCODP (1981) • Michael Oliver The Politics of Disablement (1990)

  5. Medical Model • Disability is a medical issue • Disabled people need to be adapted to society • Disabled people are incapable and need to be helped Medical Condition Impairment Handicap Disability Adapted from ICIDH, WHO, 1980

  6. Social model • Disability is a social issue • Impairment only becomes disability because society makes it so • A fair society would allow impaired people the same chances to live autonomously as non-impaired people

  7. Types of Groups • For/of • Individual/Federal • Cause/Services • Lobbyist/Awareness • Impairment specific/pan impairment • Single cause/general rights

  8. Insider/Outsider • Big charities – definitely “in”, but not actively attempting to adjust conceptions of disability • DIG, DA, RADAR – “experts” • BCODP – not in, though perhaps not trying?

  9. The role of individuals • A small network of agitators, highly skilled and highly motivated. • Personal relationships important in discussions between “offices” • However – also very similar demographics. A certain “type” of disabled person.

  10. Some disabled individuals...

  11. Networks DIG RADAR DHSS Peter Large APDG Mary Greaves DA Peter Mitchell Jack Ashley Alf Morris Victoria Scott Peter Townsend Nicholas Scott

  12. Effective? • Kingdon (1984) and “policy streams” Solution Problem Politics Policy Window Adapted from Buse, Mays, Walt, Making Health Policy (2005)

  13. Effective? • Excellent manipulation of “problem” and “politics” • Poor at influencing “solution” Picture: The Times, 15th November 1971, p. 1.

  14. The bureaumedical model? • Voluntary organisations “discovered” disability for the government • However, social model – rights – is not a measurable legal tool • But “need” can be measured – if functional limitations are equated with“need” http://www.crippencartoons.co.uk

  15. Outcome Examples • DDA employment sections did not apply to businesses employing fewer than 20 people • New capacity tests looked at medically ascertainable functional limitations – not disease nomenclature • Benefits paid more equally based on need – but still at levels far too low to alleviate poverty

  16. Thanks!

More Related