1 / 38

Phase Transitions and the Perfectness of Fluids

Phase Transitions and the Perfectness of Fluids. Jiunn-Wei Chen National Taiwan U. Shear viscosity measures how “perfect” a fluid is!. Review: shear viscosity minimum bound conjecture QCD shear viscosity in the hadronic phase: (a) zero density ( w/ Eiji Nakano )

petra
Download Presentation

Phase Transitions and the Perfectness of Fluids

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Phase Transitions and the Perfectness of Fluids Jiunn-Wei Chen National Taiwan U.

  2. Shear viscosity measures how “perfect” a fluid is!

  3. Review: shear viscosity minimum bound conjecture • QCD shear viscosity in the hadronic phase: (a) zero density (w/ Eiji Nakano) (b) nuclear L-G phase transition (w/ Yen-Fu Liu, Yen-Han Li, Eiji Nakano) • Scalar field theory (w/ Mei Huang, Yen-Han Li, Eiji Nakano, Di-Lun Yang) • Bulk Viscosity(w/ Juven Wang)

  4. Shear viscosity Frictional force

  5. Kovtun, Son, and Starinets (’05) Conjecture: Shear viscosity / entropy density • Motivated by AdS/CFT

  6. QGP (quark gluon plasma) almost saturates the bound @ just above Tc (Teaney; Romatschke, Romatschke; Song, Heinz) • LQCD, gluon pasma (Karsc h, Wyld; Nakamura, Sakai; Meyer) QGP near Tc, a perfect fluid, SQGP • PQGP: Asakawa, Bass, Müller; Xu, Greiner

  7. QCD Phase Diagram

  8. What happens below Tc?

  9. Pion gas ChPT (chiral perturbation theory) • Non-perturbative in coupling Boltzman equation Earlier work: Prakash, Prakash, Venugopalan, Welke; Dobado, Llanes-Estrada; Csernai, Kapusta , McLerran

  10. JWC, Nakano

  11. QCD Phase Diagram

  12. The “Landscape” JWC, Li, Liu, Nakano; Itakura , Morimatsu, Otomo

  13. The “Landscape” JWC, Li, Liu, Nakano

  14. QCD Phase Diagram

  15. Cold Unitary Atoms Rupak & Schafer 2007; NRCFT 2008 Lacey et al., PRL 98:092301,2007

  16. of Water (Lacey et al.)

  17. (JWC, M. Huang, Y.H. Li, E. Nakana, D.L. Yang) 1st-order phase transition a > 0, b < 0, c > 0 2nd-order p.t.: a < 0, b > 0, c = 0 crossover: + No p.t.: a > 0, b > 0, c = 0

  18. Weak coupling • Mean field calculation • CJT formulism (Cornwall, Jackiw, Tomboulis) • Boltzmann eq.

  19. QCD Bulk Viscosity Karsch, Kharzeev, Tuchin; Meyer; JWC, Wang

  20. Bulk Viscosity Gubser, Nellore, Pufu, Rocha Li, Huang

  21. Outlook Universal and behaviors? ( reaches local minimum near p.t. reaches local maximum near p.t.)

  22. Mapping QCD phase diagram by ? Locating critical end point (Lacey)

  23. Outlook • O(1/N) effect, Higher derivative gravity, (Brigante, Liu, Myers, Shenker, Yaida; Kats, Petrov) • NR AdS/CFT Cold Unitary Atoms Rupak & Schafer 2007; NRCFT 2008

  24. Outlook just below Tc for YM

  25. f Just one minimum (a < 0)? O(N) model? Large b?

  26. Invading the bound (I) w/o flavor changing (KSS; Cohen; Cherman, Cohen, Hohler)

  27. Invading the bound (II) (T. Cohen)

  28. Invading the bound (III) Higher derivative gravity (Brigante, Liu, Myers, Shenker, Yaida; Kats, Petrov): O(1/N) effect could invade the bound. Most recently, BLMSY

  29. Question • Which shear viscosity is bigger? Liquid or gas water near 100 degree C at 1 atm?

  30. Lacey et al., PRL 98:092301,2007

  31. Cold Unitary Atoms Rupak & Schafer 2007. Lacey et al., PRL 98:092301,2007

  32. Cold Unitary Atoms Rupak & Schafer 2007. NRCFT Adams, Balasubramanian, McGreevy; Maldacena, Martelli, Tachikawa; Herzog, Rangamani, Ross 2008 Lacey et al., PRL 98:092301,2007

  33. Cold Unitary Atoms Rupak & Schafer 2007. Lacey et al., PRL 98:092301,2007

More Related