1 / 44

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS. Professor Lisa High University of Windsor. QUALITATIVE PARADIGM. Naturalistic paradigm Soft science Focus: usually broad Holistic Subjective Reasoning: dialectic, inductive Basis of knowing: meaning, discovery Shared interpretation

pinedam
Download Presentation

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS Professor Lisa High University of Windsor

  2. QUALITATIVE PARADIGM • Naturalistic paradigm • Soft science • Focus: usually broad • Holistic • Subjective • Reasoning: dialectic, inductive • Basis of knowing: meaning, discovery • Shared interpretation • Communication and observation • Basic element of analysis: words • Individual interpretations • Uniqueness

  3. The “Logic” of Qualitative Research • Based on holistic view & following beliefs: • There is no single reality – reality is based on perceptions – it is different for each person – changes over time • What we know has meaning only within a given situation or context The reasoning process in qualitative research involves: - perceptually putting pieces together to make wholes

  4. What is the concept of “Gestalt”? • This concept is closely related to “wholism” and proposes that a particular phenomenon is organized into a cluster of linked ideas, “a gestalt”. • Disadvantage: • understand a phenomenon through the interpretation of a particular theory

  5. Experiencing “Gestalt Change” • First to deconstruct your original sedimented views • Reconstruct another view • Focus on a different view point or looking at something differently (a different lens) • To increase openness

  6. Philosophy and Qualitative Research • Frameworks are not used the same as in quantitative • The goal is not theory testing • Each study should be guided by a particular philosophical stance • Philosophical Stance assists to: • directs the question(s) that are asked • the observations which are made • the interpretation of data

  7. DESIGN OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES • Specify design before data collection • Adhere to the design after study started • Study design evolves over time • Researcher Decisions include: • How to obtain • From whom to collect • How to schedule • How long

  8. Design of Qualitative Research • EMERGENT DESIGN • A design that emerges as the researcher makes ongoing decisions reflecting what has already been learned • Lincoln & Cuba (1985) – not researcher laziness or sloppiness – but rather desire to base inquiry on realities and viewpoints of those under study • Key: realities and viewpoints that are NOT KNOWN or UNDERSTOOD AT THE OUTSET

  9. Characteristics of Qualitative Research Design • Flexible, elastic, capable of adjusting • Merging together of various data collection strategies • Holistic, understand the whole • Research intensely involved • Research to become the research instrument • Requires ongoing analysis of data to formulate subsequent strategies and to determine when field work is done What is “Bricolage?”

  10. Qualitative Designs • PHASES of a Qualitative Study: • Orientation an overview • Focused exploration • Confirmation and closure (Lincoln & Cuba, 1985)

  11. Qualitative Design Features • Control over the independent variable • Type of group comparisons • Number of data collection points • Occurrence of the independent & dependent variables

  12. Qualitative Research Traditions • Four traditions described by nurse researcher: • Ethnography • Phenomenology • Grounded Theory • Historical Research

  13. ETHNOGRAPHY • Research tradition in anthropology • Provides a framework for studying meanings, patterns, and experiences defined by a cultural group in a holistic fashion • Ethnoscience (Cognitive Anthropology): focuses on the cognitive world of a culture – semantic rules and shared meanings that shape behavoir

  14. ETHNOGRAPHY • Focus: the culture of a group of people • Assumption: every human group evolves a culture that guides members view of the world and the way they structure their experiences • At times referred to as “macroethnography: - able to study broadly defined cultures • At times referred to as “microethnography”– able to study cultures using a very narrow focus

  15. Ethnography Cont’d • Aim: to learn from rather than study members of a cultural group • Two perspectives: • Emic– insider’s view, the way the members of a culture envision their world • Etic - outsiders’ interpretation of the experiences of that culture – strive to get at cultural experiences that members do not talk about or may not even be consciously aware

  16. Ethnography Cont’d • Extensive field work • Typically labor intensive • Time consuming • Researcher as instrument - to study a culture it requires a certain level of intimacy – needs to be developed – become one within the culture

  17. Ethnography Cont’d • Three types of information: • Cultural behavoir • Cultural artifacts • Cultural speech Sources of information– in-depth interviews, records, charts, observations and other types of physical evidence are used

  18. Ethnography Cont’d • Products of this research includes: • rich and holistic descriptions • describe normative behavoir and social patterns • Information about health beliefs and health practices • Facilitates an understanding of behavoirs affecting health and illness • Leininger coined the phrase: “ethnonursing research”–the study and analysis of local or indigneous people’s viewpoints, beliefs and practices about nursing care behavoir and processes of designated cultures

  19. Phenomenology • Phenomenology is both philosophy and a research method • Purpose of this research method is to describe experiences as they are lived – to capture the “lived experience” • Developed by Husserl & Heidegger – an approach to thinking about people’s life experiences.

  20. Phenomenology Cont’d Philosophical Orientation • view the person as integral with the environment • World is shaped by the self and also shapes the self • The person is a self within a body • Person is referred to as “embodied”– our bodies provide the possibility for the concrete actions of self in the world • The body, the world and the concerns, unique to each person, are the “context” within which that person can be understood • “being in time”

  21. Phenomenology Cont’d • A phenomenological researcher asks the question: “What is the essence of this phenomena as experienced by these people and what does it mean?” Assumption: there is an “essence” an essential variant structure • Investigates subjective phenomena • Belief that truths about reality are grounded in peoples’ lived experiences

  22. Phenomenology Cont’d • Two Schools of Thought: • Descriptive phenomenology • Interpretive phenomenology (hermeneutics)

  23. Phenomenology Cont’d • Four aspects of the lived experience: • SPATIALITY • CORPOREALITY • TEMPORALITY • RELATIONALITY

  24. Phenomenology Cont’d • Phenomenologists believe– human existence is “meaningful” and “interesting” • “Being in the world” or “Embodiment” is a concept that acknowledges people’s physical ties to their world • People: • THINK • SEE • HEAR • FEEL • CONCIOUS OF THEIR BODIES INTERACTION WITH THE WORLD

  25. Phenomenology Cont’d • Data sources: • In-depth conversations • Researcher helps the participant to describe lived experiences without leading the discussion • Two or more interviews/conversations are needed • Usually small number of participants (ie. 10 or less) • May use participation, observation and introspective reflection

  26. Phenomenology Cont’d • Methodological Interpretations Used: • BRACKETING • INTUITING

  27. Grounded Theory • Is an inductive research technique developed for health-related topics by Glaser & Strauss (1967) • Emerged from the discipline of sociology • “Grounded”– means the theory developed from the research is grounded or has it roots in the data from which is was derived

  28. Grounded Theory Cont’d • Philosophical Orientation: • Based on symbolic interaction theory • Explores how people define reality and how their beliefs are related to their actions • Meaning is expressed through – symbols – such as words, religious objects, and clothing • Symbolic meanings are different for each of us • In social life - meanings are shared by groups – socialization process • Group life is based on consensus and shared meanings

  29. Grounded Theory Cont’d • Is an approach to study the social processes and social structures • Focus: is the evolution of a social experience – the social and psychological stages that characterize a particular event of process

  30. Grounded Theory Cont’d • Methodology: • does not begin with a focused research question • the question emerges from the data • fundamental structure feature– • is the “data collection” • is the “data analysis” • Is the sampling of participants occurs simultaneously • This procedure is referred to as “constant comparison”

  31. Grounded Theory Cont’d • Constant Comparison: is used to develop and refine theoretically relevant categories and to identify the basic problem • Categories that are elicited from the data are constantly compared with data obtained earlier so that “commonalities” and “variations” can be determined • Categories can be “condensed” and “collapsed”

  32. Grounded Theory Cont’d • Data Sources: • in-depth interviews are most common • Observational methods • Existing documents • Usually a sample of 25 to 50 informants • Has contributed to the development of middle range nursing theories

  33. Historical Research • Historiography examines events of the past • Historians believe the greatest value of historical knowledge is an increased self-understanding • Philosophical Orientation: • A very old science • Primary question “Where have we come from, who are we, and where are we going?” • Myths, past, present and future are not distinguishable • Myths are a form of story telling

  34. Historical Research Cont’d • History moves beyond the myth • Chronicling events, deeds, victories and stories about people and civilizations • Comparing histories, identifying patterns • Aim: • to discovery new knowledge • Seeking to answer questions concerning causes, effects and trends relating to past events • To shed light on present behaviors and practices

  35. Historical Research Cont’d • Assumptions: • There is nothing new under the sun • One can learn from the past

  36. Sampling in Qualitative Research • Usually small, non-random samples • Concern: measure attributes and relationships in a pop’n • Need a representative sample • Aim: to discover meaning, uncover multiple realities, therefore generalization is not a guiding criteria

  37. Sampling in Qualitative Research • Types of sampling: • Convenience sampling • Snowball sampling • Theoretical sampling • Purposeful sampling – several strategies – maximum variation sampling, extreme/deviant case sampling, and typical case sampling • Simple random

  38. Sample Size • No firm establishment of criteria or rules • Should be determined on the basis of informational needs • Is largely a function of: • the purpose of the inquiry • the quality of the informants • The type of sampling strategy used

  39. Sample Size • Guiding Principle is that of, • DATA SATURATION: sampling to the point at which no new information is obtained and redundancy is achieved

  40. Critiquing the Sampling Plan • Evaluate the sample plan based on the following: • Terms of its adequacy • Terms of its appropriateness Adequacy means – Appropriateness means -

  41. Assessment of Qualitative Data • Need to address validity and reliability • Do the measures used by the researcher yield data reflecting the truth? • Lincolon & Cuba (1985) – four criteria: • Credibility • Dependability • Confirmability • Transferability (criteria for establishing “trustworthiness”)

  42. Assessment of Qualitative Data • Credibility – refers to confidence in the truth of the data • Prolonged engagement • Persistent observation • Triangulation • External checks – peer debriefing & member checks • Researcher credibility

  43. Assessment of Qualitative Data • Dependability– refers to data stability over time and over conditions • Steps to approach: • Stepwise replication • Inquiry audit

  44. Assessment of Qualitative Data • Confirmability–refers to the objectivity or neutrality of the data – what does that mean? • AUDIT TRAIL: • Transferability– refers to the extent to which the findings from the data can be transferred to other settings or groups = similar to the concept of generalizability • THICK DESCRIPTION:

More Related