1 / 7

Adulterous Teacher

Adulterous Teacher. By Gerald Card P247-251. Title and Citation. ERB v. Iowa State Board of Public Education Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974 216 N.W. 2d 339. Facts. Richard Erb was a fine arts teacher of 9 years and was caught having an affair with the home economics teacher

qamar
Download Presentation

Adulterous Teacher

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adulterous Teacher By Gerald Card P247-251

  2. Title and Citation ERB v. Iowa State Board of Public Education Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974 216 N.W. 2d 339

  3. Facts • Richard Erb was a fine arts teacher of 9 years and was caught having an affair with the home economics teacher • He tried to resign but the school board of education turned it down. • The Board refused to allow Erb’s Lawyer to cross examine witnesses • They voted to revoke his certificate without any findings of fact or conclusion of law

  4. Issue • Richard Erb had his teaching certificate revoked • Was adultery reason enough to revoke a teachers certificate

  5. Holding • Limitations at the hearing. In the appeal Erb objected to not being able to cross examine. This objection should have been made during the hearing and because it was not it cannot be an issue at the appeal. • Failure to make findings. The Board did act illegally by revoking the certificate without stating the findings of facts of the case. • Sufficiency of the evidence. Without the Findings of facts an appeal court cannot see the reasoning of the Boards actions.

  6. Legal Doctrine • The Board Contended that adultery automatically makes a person unfit to teach • The appeals court disagrees. This belief gives the Board the power to revoke any teachers certificate that opposes their approval

  7. Significance Morrison v. State Board of Education 461 p.2d 375, 394 (cal.1969) 68 AM Jur. 2d Schools § 134 at 465 “Conduct must adversely affect the teacher-student relationship”

More Related