1 / 33

Review of Phenolics in Grapes and Optimizing Their Extraction into Wine

Flavor 101C Impact of Phenolic Management on Wine Style Options February 15, 2013. Review of Phenolics in Grapes and Optimizing Their Extraction into Wine. Doug Adams Department of Viticulture & Enology University of California, Davis. Organization of the Talk.

quanda
Download Presentation

Review of Phenolics in Grapes and Optimizing Their Extraction into Wine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Flavor 101C Impact of Phenolic Management on Wine Style Options February 15, 2013 Review of Phenolics in Grapes and Optimizing Their Extraction into Wine Doug Adams Department of Viticulture & Enology University of California, Davis

  2. Organization of the Talk • Major phenolics in the grape berry • Extraction during winemaking Review the phenolic classes and describe berry factors that complicate extraction.

  3. BERRY STRUCTURE • PULP • juice • no pigment • SKIN • pigments • tannins • SEEDS • tannins Not enough detail for a discussion of extraction

  4. Tissue Types in the Grape (from a phenolics perspective) } • Epidermis • Hypodermis • Outer mesocarp • Vascular tissue • Inner mesocarp Skin } Pulp

  5. Light micrograph of mature grape berry Scale Bar = 200 µm F. Famiani et al. J. Exp. Bot. 51:675-683 (2000)

  6. Pericarp at Day 84 (‘Traminer’) (Hardie et al., 1996) Cross section of berry 84 days after flowering Note the polyphenolic deposits in the hypodermal cells Note the size and shape of the hypodermal and mesocarp cells .

  7. Exocarp at Day 126 (‘Traminer’) (Hardie et al., 1996) Cross section of berry showing epidermal and hypodermal cells (the skin) Note the wall thickness of the cells with polyphenolic deposits

  8. Tissue Types in the Grape (from a phenolics perspective) 6. Cuticle 7. Parenchyma 8. Testa 9. Aleurone? 10. Endosperm Seed

  9. Polymeric Flavan-3-ols Condensed Tannins, Proanthocyanidins Four subunits In grape tannins Very diverse set of compounds

  10. Simple Dimers of Catechin and Epicatechin Number of unique chemical structures is 2n

  11. Summary of Flavan-3-ol Composition of Skins and Seeds Skinshave relatively low levels of free catechin and epicatechin. The size of the tannins in skin is much greater than in seeds and the polymers contain catechin, epicatechin and epigallocatechin. Seeds have much higher levels of free catechin and epicatechin. The size of the tannins in seeds is much smaller than in skins, and the extension units are mostly epicatechin. Some of the subunits contain gallate esters.

  12. The Anthocyanins in Grape Berries

  13. The Hydroxycinnamates of Grape This is the most abundant class of phenolics in white wines

  14. Catechin and epicatechin are the most abundant flavan-3-ols in grape Most of the free catechin and epicatechin is found in the seeds.

  15. The Flavonols Found in Grape Berries

  16. Stilbenes are very minor phenolic components

  17. Changes in the total amounts of the major individual anthocyanin species found in [Shiraz] grapes during development. Note that malvidin glucosides dominate the anthocyanin profile From P.K.Boss, C.Davies and S.P. Robinson Plant Physiol. 111:1059-1066 (1996)

  18. Relative Amounts of Flavonoids in Skins of a Vitis Hybrid Total Anthocyanin 2.88 µmoles/g 42 % was Malvidin 3,5 diglucoside Total Hydroxycinnamic acid esters 0.98 µmoles/g 77% was Caftaric Acid Total Flavonol Glycosides 0.19 µmoles/g 93% were Quercetin glycosides Data from A.H Moskowitz and G.Hrazdina Plant Physiol 68: 686-692 (1981)

  19. Tannin in Syrah Fruit and Pomace from a Commercial Fermentation Example 1 Seeds – 4% Extracted Skins – 56% Extracted Wine Tannin 331 mg/L Average Syrah – 484 mg/L

  20. Tannin in Syrah Fruit and Pomace from a Commercial Fermentation Example 2 Seeds – 56% Extracted Skins – 64% Extracted Wine Tannin 880 mg/L Average Syrah – 484 mg/L

  21. Tannin Binding by Cabernet Sauvignon Cell Walls At Three Times During Ripening

  22. Cell Wall Mass and Tannin Binding Capacity In Cabernet Sauvignon Fruit Cell Wall Mass Tannin Binding

  23. Comparison of Total Fruit Tannin and Total Binding Capacity The insoluble Matrix could bind nearly 70% Of the tannin in the fruit.

  24. We Must Be Cautious With Our Interpretation Because: • Tannin binding is concentration dependent • Tannin binding is reduced by ethanol • Tannin binding is reduced at higher temperatures • Measurements made prior to fermentation • Nevertheless, the results indicate that the insoluble matrix • constitutes a powerful fining agent, and plays an important • role in tannin extraction during fermentation.

  25. Missing Tannin 20%-60% So where is the missing tannin?

  26. “Bound” Tannins (Proanthocyanidins): • excess HCl in butanol with ferrous sulphate used as reaction mixture • 95ºC for 1 hour • Abs at 550nm, gives quantification in Absorbance Units (AU) Cons: • Doesn’t measure terminal unit of proanthocyanidin • Not directly quantifiable in common “tannin” terms (Ferric chloride positive)

  27. Estimating the amount of irreversibly bound tannin accounts for most of the ‘missing’ tannin. 9% extra tannin 7% tannin missing

  28. Small Experimental Fermentation

  29. Current Understanding of Tannin Extraction The tannins of the skin and seed are highly water soluble. The skin epidermis and the seed cuticle are effective extraction barriers. The cell walls of the berry constitute a powerful tannin fining agent. The insoluble matrix preferentially binds larger tannins. (larger tannins are more astringent on a weight basis) There are two classes of tannins on the insoluble matrix after fermentation. Loosely bound - extractable with 70% acetone Tightly bound - observable with acidic butanol and by NMR The amount of tightly bound tannin increases during fermentation.

  30. Acknowledgements and Thanks • Flavor 101 Organizers • Funding Agencies • American Vineyard Foundation • Viticulture Consortium • Participants

More Related