1 / 26

NICMOS Status

NICMOS Status. Roelof de Jong (STScI) and the NICMOS team: Santiago Arribas, Elizabeth Barker, Eddie Bergeron, Ilana Dashevsky, Anton Koekemoer, Sangeeta Malhotra, Bahram Mobasher, Keith Noll, Tom Wheeler, Tommy Wiklind, Chun Xu and Ralph Bohlin, Adam Riess. Overview. Instrument Pipeline

quinta
Download Presentation

NICMOS Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NICMOS Status Roelof de Jong (STScI) and the NICMOS team: Santiago Arribas, Elizabeth Barker, Eddie Bergeron, Ilana Dashevsky, Anton Koekemoer, Sangeeta Malhotra, Bahram Mobasher, Keith Noll, Tom Wheeler, Tommy Wiklind, Chun Xu and Ralph Bohlin, Adam Riess

  2. Overview • Instrument • Pipeline • Photometry • (Non-)Linearity & Zeropoint • Calibration plans

  3. Instrument • Very stable due to NICMOS Cryo-cooler System (NCS) • Darks, Focus, Flats, Temperature stable • 2-gyro mode observations successful • New SPARS MULTIACCUMs added • SPARS4, SPARS16, SPARS32, SPARS128 • SPARS sequences preferred for anything that has no huge dynamic range Poster P3-4 Xu

  4. Instrument: dark current • Dark current stable (near day 600 persistence of Mars observation)

  5. Instrument: focus

  6. Instrument: 2-gyro mode PSF nominal Coronographic rejection identical (no second roll angle in same orbit) Poster P3-7 Malhotra

  7. Pipeline/software updates • MultiDrizzle implemented for NICMOS • Routines available for • SAA cosmic ray persistence removal • Crosstalk removal (Mr. Stay-puft) • Improved imaging and new grism Exposure Time Calculator (July 2004) • Continues improvements made, always use the latest version for you proposals P3-5 Bergeron P3-6 Koekemoer

  8. In the pipeline for the Pipeline • Improved reference files • Better darks for 77.1K • SAA clean • Mr. Stay-puft (quadrant crosstalk) • Temperature from bias • Amp glow persistence • Improved treatment of Cosmics removal • Reduces noise in pixels affected by cosmics

  9. Photometry • New photometry keywords/zeropoints • Delivered July 2004 • Main differences with previous values: • Separate values Cycles 7/7N and Cycles 11+ • Wavelength dependent aperture corrections • Improved (latest) data reduction methods • Better tied to ground-based measurements

  10. Photometry: sensitivity change • Detector sensitivity improved going from 66 K to 77.1 K after NCS installation

  11. Photometry: aperture corrections • Going from fixed to infinite apertures • Wavelength dependence determined from TinyTim PSFs Aperture radius NIC1 11.5 pix NIC2 6.5 pix NIC3 5.5 pix

  12. Spectro-photometric calibration • P330E - Solar Analog • Spectrum: measurements + model • G191B2B - White Dwarf • Spectrum: LTE model • Tied to ground based through Persson et al. Standards (2MASS) (details in forthcoming ISR)

  13. Photometry: count rate standards • Other HST spectro-photometric standards consistent

  14. Photometry: time evolution • Some sensitivity loss in NIC2 • Data in other two cameras too noisy

  15. NICMOS non-linearity • Classic well depth non-linearity well understood • Dependents on total counts, not count rate • Corrected in pipeline

  16. Count Rate Non-linearity • Stellar standards over a broad magnitude range were observed with the grisms • Comparison with overlapping STIS spectra revealed an unexpected disagreement between STIS and NICMOS • ACS data suggested NICMOS as the source of the difference • Potential for important consequences to key NICMOS science makes this effect important to understand

  17. Non-linearity: NICMOS vs ACS • Similar effect when comparing NICMOS grism to ACS photometry

  18. Non-linearity: wavelength dependence • Compare observed NICMOS spectra to white dwarf models extended to IR from STIS optical • Effect strongly reduced at longer wavelengths

  19. Non-linearity:NICMOS spec vs phot • Agreement between observed NICMOS spectra and photometry within errors • Poor agreement when spectra are corrected to STIS flux expectations

  20. Non-linearity: lamp off/on test • Increase total count rate by adding light of the flatfield lamp to the background • Count rate increases as predicted by non-linearity (cycle 7 NIC2 data)

  21. Non-linearity: no trapping signal • MULTIACCUM sequences nearly stable independent of count rate • If non-linearity caused by charge traps, time scales have to be longer than 500 seconds

  22. Non-linearity: The evidence • NICMOS grism vs • STIS & ACS spectra • ACS photometry • Lamp off/on test • Supernova models ACS -> NICMOS J&H • Narrowband vs Broadband filter throughputs ground vs. inflight • UDF inconclusive

  23. Non-linearity: UDF vs. ground • Use color corrections or template fitting to match F110W to J ground • Different results depending on reduction (talk Mobasher & Thompson) • Effect expected to bottom out at sky level, ~23 AB-mag F110W for point sources, earlier extended sources • Maximum effect ~0.2 mag in F110W, no effect expected in F160W

  24. Non-linearity: Unknowns Count Rate  Flux() or Electrons () (F110W)~1.02, (F160W)~1.00 • Only incoming photons or add dark current? • Power law correction full count rate range? • Same exponent in all cameras? • Same wavelength dependence in all cameras? • Temperature dependence (cycle 7 vs 11+) • Pixel-to-pixel dependence? • Persistence? • Physical explanation!

  25. Calibration plan • Usual monitoring: dark, flat, focus, photometry • Lamp off/on/off test: imaging and grism, different filters and cameras • Persistence tests using bright stars and flatfields, test wavelength and count rate dependence • Deeper photometry on faintest standards • Check consistency between 2MASS and NICMOS in Orion legacy survey field • Low frequency flat measurement in Camera 1; monitoring data show residuals with position • Non-linearity correction: may be hard to implement backward compatible with previous reductions Poster P3-1 Arribas

  26. Conclusions • Instrument very stable with NCS • Photometry: • Improved aperture corrections • Possible count rate dependent non-linearity at <1.6 micron • Test are scheduled in November to quantify non-linearity • For latest news check NICMOS website • Subscribe to the NICMOS STAN newsletter

More Related