1 / 14

CSE 301 History of Computing

CSE 301 History of Computing. Electromechanical Computing. The typewriter. First practical typewriter invented by Christopher Latham Sholes in 1867 Soon sold by Remington

quintana
Download Presentation

CSE 301 History of Computing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSE 301History of Computing Electromechanical Computing

  2. The typewriter • First practical typewriter invented by Christopher Latham Sholes in 1867 • Soon sold by Remington • One historian of manufacturing has noted, the “typewriter was the most complex mechanism mass produced by American industry, … , in the 19th century” • Pioneered 3 key features of the office machine industry (and thus later the computer industry) • The perfection of the product & low-cost manufacture • A sales organization to sell the product • A training organization to enable workers to use the technology

  3. Other office technologies • Adding Machine • Arithmometer by Thomas de Colmar of Alsace (1820) • impractical, slow to manufacture • Comptometer by Dorr E. Felt (1880s) • first “practical” adding machine • Burroughs Adding Machine by William Burroughs • Printed results, was commercially successful • Cash Register • Invented by restaurateur James Ritty in 1879 • Sold only one machine – to John H. Patterson • Patterson, “an aggressive, egotistical crank”, ran with Ritty’s invention • bought and then renamed Ritty’s company to the National Cash Register Company (NCR) • innovated sales techniques

  4. The Birth of “Big Blue” • Hollerith founded the Tabulating Machine Company in 1896. • Machines used again in the 1900 U.S. Census • Advanced machines made by rival James Powers used in 1910 U.S. Census • Powers forms Powers Tabulating Machine Company in 1911 • Hollerith’s company merged into Computer Tabulating Recording Company (CTRC) • Hollerith serves as consulting engineer with CTRC until retirement in 1921. • CTRC was renamed International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in 1924.

  5. Thomas J. Watson, Sr. • Born in Campbell, New York, in 1874 • Worked as salesman for NCR • moved up quickly in the company • he was a sales fanatic • worked on “secret project” for Patterson • helped him move up through company ranks • after success, he was abruptly fired in 1911 • Hired by C T R (Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company) in 1914 • CTR was a firm created by Charles Flint that had merged 3 others, including Hollerith’s • Watson combined NCR sales techniques with Hollerith’s technology • renamed the company International Business Machines in 1924 • Watson helped “Big Blue” grow rapidly • Gave aid to Nazis during WWII?

  6. Big Blue’s Rise • Hollerith was smart to rent machines rather than sell them • Watson took advantage of this • resisted business & government pressure to sell machines • punched cards were sold for huge profit margins • “rent and refill” nature of the punched-card business made IBM virtually recession proof • steady year-after-year income • even during the Great Depression • rarely lost customers • necessary accuracy of punched cards made competition nearly impossible • Government contracts also helped • The government never goes out of business • FDR’s New Deal gave IBM a lot of business • Watson’s political support for the New Deal helped IBM get even more • Another factor that kept IBM on top: technical innovation • more on this as the semester progresses

  7. Modern Punch Cards • Used from 1928 until the mid 1970s. • Still used up to 2000 in voting machines in the U.S. Presidential election • leads to the “Hanging Chad” controversy

  8. Harvard Mark IIBM Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator • Digital computer • Aiken’s machine for “makin’ numbers” • Developed by Howard Aiken 1937-1943 at Harvard University • Inspired by Babbage • IBM funded the construction under the permission of Thomas J. Watson • Constructed out of switches, relays, rotating shafts and clutches • Sounded like a “roomful of ladies knitting”

  9. Harvard Mark I • Contained more than 750,000 components • over 50 feet long • 8 feet tall • weighed approximately 5 tons • 750,000 parts • hundreds of miles of wiring • Performance: • Could store just 72 numbers • Could perform 3 additions or subtractions per second • Multiplication took 6 seconds • Logs & trig functions took over a minute • Fed programs using punched tape • Could perform iteration (loops), not conditional branching

  10. Aiken vs. IBM • Watson had IBM give it a facelift against Aiken’s wishes • 1944 – started to be used for table making for the Bureau of Ships • Intense interest from press & scientific community • “Harvard’s Robot Superbrain” – American Weekly • Users manual was the first digital computing publication • 1944 Dedication Ceremony • Aiken took full credit for it, ignoring IBM’s Engineer’s contribution • Made Watson furious • Watson wanted revenge • not the murdering kind, the let’s make a machine that puts the Mark I to shame kind • The Selective Sequence Electronic Calculator (later)

  11. Harvard Mark IIBM Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator • In 1947, how many electronic digital computers did Aiken predict would be required to satisfy the computing needs of the entire U.S.? • Six (that’s right: 6) The HarvardMark I

  12. Harvard Mark IIBM Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator Harvard Mark II

  13. Harvard Mark IIBM Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator Harvard Mark IV

  14. The demise of electromechanical computing • Computers like the Mark I were quickly eclipsed by electronic machines • Electronic machines had no moving parts • Mark I shortcomings • was brutally slow • our authors go so far as to say: • “Not only was the Harvard Mark I a technological dead end, it did not even do anything very useful in the fifteen years that it ran.” • the Navy might disagree slightly • “Babbage’s Dream Come True”? • ran 10 times as fast as Babbage’s Analytical Engine • could not perform decision making (branching) • within 2 years electronic machines were working 1000 times faster

More Related