1.1.Recovery strategic planning capacities are strengthened.

1. In line with UN Policy Committee decisions and Copenhagen objectives, early recovery capacity, tailored to country-specific needs, is strengthened on a predictable basis, promotes national and local engagement and ownership, and links to longer-term recovery and development planning Outcome 1 Early recovery strategic planning and programming is initiated at the earliest stages of a crisis Outcome 2 Joint assessments inform strategic frameworks and priorities for early recovery Outcome 3 Coordination mechanisms and partnerships are improved at local, country and global levels Outcome 4 Information and knowledge management are based on common standards and best practices Outcome 5 Predictable funding mechanisms for ER are in place 1.1.Recovery strategic planning capacities are strengthened. 1.2.Local capacity for ER planning and implementation strengthened in areas of expertise where there is recurrent demand for support. 1.3.Inter-agency standing capacity available for strategic planning in technical areas of expertise where there is a recurrent demand for support. 1.4.ER strategies build on humanitarian initiatives and longer-term/broader development frameworks. 1.5. Joint early recovery activities implemented in a coordinated manner in support of diverse local community needs. • 2.1.Implementation of joint ER needs assessments, by IASC country teams and local partners, based on global agreements. • 2.2.Joint assessments follow templates, guidance and agreed SOPs; and norms are revised based on country experience. • 2.3.In countries at risk pre-arrangements with national actors are in place for financing, technical expertise, information sharing, training, assessment and planning etc. • 3.1.Country-level capacity to coordinate and implement ER is strengthened. • 3.2.ER networks and clusters receive ER coordination support as required. • 3.3.Partnerships and advocacy for ER is strengthened. • 3.4.ER is mainstreamed into the work of other clusters at global and country levels. • 3.5.Cross-cutting issues are integrated into all dimensions of the ER process. • 3.6.M&E system for global cluster evaluation developed and implemented. • 3.7.Global CWGER leadership, coordination and secretariat provided. • 4.1.Information on ER assessment, planning and programming is analyzed and shared among key stakeholders to inform a coordinated and comprehensive ER response. • 4.2.ER guidelines and tools are used, adapted and revised as necessary. • 4.3.ER interventions are informed by and build on experiences in-country and elsewhere. • 4.4.M&E systems for ER are in place to monitor the impact of ER interventions and revise ER priorities and activities as necessary. • 4.5.Policy processes and decisions on ER are informed by practice at the country level. • 4.6.ER is included in the current global work on country based IM systems. • 5.1.Funding secured for ER strategic planning, assessment, coordination and information management in both post- conflict and post-disaster situations. • 5.2.Preparedness, ER programmes in conflict, post-conflict and post disaster situations are predictably and systematically resourced. • 5.3.ER fully and adequately integrated in CAPs and Flash Appeals • 5.4.Development funds are accessible for ER activities. CWGER 2010/11 Strategic Framework