1 / 9

LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002

LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002. UV Pulse Requirements Laser System Overview Manipulation of Temporal Envelopes (ir) Some Key Diagnostics UV Conversion UV Pulse Delivery to Photocathode Meeting the Specifications. UV Pulse requirements. Energy

rachaeld
Download Presentation

LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LCLS Injector Laser SystemPaul R. Bolton, SLACApril 24, 2002 • UV Pulse Requirements • Laser System Overview • Manipulation of Temporal Envelopes (ir) • Some Key Diagnostics • UV Conversion • UV Pulse Delivery to Photocathode • Meeting the Specifications Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  2. UV Pulse requirements • Energy • 260 nm < l < 266 nm • > 0.5 mJ to cathode (for nC electron production with 10-5 QE) • energy stability < 2 % rms (for ir < 0.7 % rms) • Timing • 120 Hz rep rate • 10 psec FWHM pulse duration with 0.5 psec rise/fall time • nominally ‘square’ temporal envelope but adjustable • laser-RF timing jitter < 500 fsec rms • Spatial • profile homogeneity at cathode < 10 % ptp • spot diameter = 2 mm (hard edge) with jitter < 1 % ptp • pointing jitter < 1% of radius rms (< 10 microns for 1 mm radius) Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  3. LaserSystem Overview Ti:Sapphire Choice -high bandwidth available -high average power output -stable, industrial standard for broadband TiS mode-locked oscillator -lock to 79.33 MHz ext source ~ 15 nJ pulse energy 5 nJ Pulse Shaper Pulse Stretcher 2nd Stage Bowtie Amplifier -100 mJ pump level @ 532 nm average single pass gain = 6.3 1st Stage Bowtie Amplifier -100 mJ pump level @ 532 nm average single pass gain = 7 Vacuum spatial filtering & profile flattening 18 mJ 12 mJ • UV Pulse Delivery • to Photocathode • relay imaged • - grazing incidence Pulse Compression 7 mJ UV Conversion (two crystals) 1 mJ (uv) Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  4. UV Pulse Shape Fourier Transform Sinc2(aDn) a = 10 ps (fwhm) < 0.5 ps aDn Manipulation of Temporal Envelopes • Frequency Domain Pulse Shaping • performed at low pulse energy • minimizes optical damage and uses ir wavelengths • efficient use of amplifier stored energy • shaper efficiency ~50% • alters spectral shape and effective bandwidth • computer-programming of transform-limited pulse shapes Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  5. Pulse Stretching suppresses nonlinear behaviour (including damage) in amplifier imposes positive linear chirp on ir waveform: w ( t) = w0 + 2 pt pulse duration stretched by a factor up to 104 efficiency 50 – 65 % Pulse Compression imposes a negative chirp to undo the positive dispersion for ‘matched’ condition recover transform limited pulsewidths incomplete compression is an additional shaping option efficiency 50 – 65 % Manipulation of Temporal Envelopes Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  6. Some Key Diagnostics • Amplifier Probe Pulse • ultrashort pulse verifies amplifier total gains • cross-correlation with shaped oscillator (ir) pulses (using a low energy diagnostic compressor) • cross-correlation with shaped uv pulses • Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating (FROG) • ultrafast single pulse diagnostic (ir and uv) • provides ‘local’ uv pulse measurement at photocathode location • Electron Beam Generated Phase Error Signal • ‘bottom line’ type phase error wrt injector RF • generated using a beamline resonator Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  7. UV Conversion • BaB2O4 (BBO) crystals of thickness near 0.5 mm • ir to uv in 2 steps: (SHG in 1st crystal) + (SFG in 2nd crystal) • for 6 nm bandwidth (120 fsec pulsewidth) conversion efficiency is 11 - 21 % • modified (polarization) Type II phase matching technique will be tested (has demonstrated conversion efficiencies in excess of 30 % above 0.5 GW/cm2 with 140 psec pulses using KDP) • saturate conversion: improves uv pulse energy stability (given ir stability) • damage threshold limits: measurements (ongoing) at J/cm2 level mean spotsizes > 1 mm • document effects of ir pulse shaping and profile flattening Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  8. UV Pulse Delivery to Photocathode • grazing incidence, P polarization • image hard edged aperture (trimmer) onto cathode • specular reflection diagnostics • spatial filtering • launch grating corrects anamorphic magnification and time slew : Launch Grating b ct 2 mm Photocathode E-Beam Specular Reflection To Joulemeter/Camera Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

  9. Meeting the Specifications • Pulse Energy • oscillator • Diode pumping in TEMoo mode • environmental controls – temperature,humidity,mechanical isolation,beam covering • amplifier • Fourier relay imaging and saturation of ir gain (final passes) • Feed forward stabilized Nd:YAG pumping of TiS • uv conversion (rms energy jitter < 2%) • saturate conversion & measure detailed pulse characteristics at photocathode • Spatial Profile • ir spatial filtering & profile flattening (optional uv spatial filtering) • overfill hard edge aperture (relay imaged onto photocathode) • Timing • oscillator bandwidth enables ‘square’ pulse generation • oscillator –RF timing jitter (integrated to 40 MHz) < 480 fsec (measured) • additional (external) phase-locked loop uses sampled ir pulse energy (oscillator) and e- beam generated phase error signal Paul R. Bolton, SLAC

More Related