1 / 34

8. Asian regionalism: opportunities and constraints

8. Asian regionalism: opportunities and constraints. Overview. Rise of East Asian regional trade New production systems and trade networks: production sharing/fragmentation Winners from the new system: skill-intensive economies Mixed stories: labor-intensive and resource-abundant economies

Download Presentation

8. Asian regionalism: opportunities and constraints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 8. Asian regionalism: opportunities and constraints

  2. Overview • Rise of East Asian regional trade • New production systems and trade networks: production sharing/fragmentation • Winners from the new system: skill-intensive economies • Mixed stories: labor-intensive and resource-abundant economies • Future challenges: China as investor in SE Asia; development implications?

  3. Asian integration and development • Rapid growth of China, serving global markets • Lower trade costs raise final demand and int’l demand for inputs • Trade in intermediates (fragmentation): the main stimulus to intra-Asian trade and skills accumulation • Also boom in demand for energy & nat res products, with impacts on resource exporters in Asia and worldwide • Consequences of Asian integration? Esp. when comparative advantage includes depletable natural resources

  4. What are “parts and components”? • Look at this list…. • This is not the world of Heckscher-Ohlin!

  5. Trade-development stories • Old: N-S trade based on factor endowment diffs (H-O) • Vertical integration; in South: labor-intensive exports, skill-intensive imports • Strong predictions of trade and distribution, but empirical weakness and few policy insights • New: intraindustry trade in intermediates, with production distributed according to cost • Infinite number of varieties are produced, not just 2 • Fragmentation possible b/c of lower trade and ‘service’ costs

  6. From national production to fragmentation Cost, price YN YF YF’ SF SF’ SN Q Q’ Output, inputs National prodn (N): low service costs, high marginal costs. Fragmented prodn (F):higher service costs, lower marginal costs

  7. Fragmentation • Low service costs = integration across borders (MNCs, production-sharing contracts) • Distribute production and assembly operations according to lowest cost • National borders don’t matter so long as trade is open • Analyzing production and trade in a fragmented world: • Many intermediate goods ,each produced with constant returns to scale by a competitive firm • One assembly operation to complete final good

  8. Chinese growth and market integration • Focus on manufacturing trade • Three (or more) countries ranked by skills-labor endowment ratio (kA < kB < kC); thus (w/r)A < (w/r)B < (w/r)C • Continuum of manuf. goods 0 ≤ z ≤ 1, ranked by skill intensity • Single natural resource good (y) • Factor mobility assumptions: • Fixed capital ( = skills) in manufacturing • Fixed resource stocks & extraction capital in resource sector • Intersectorally mobile labor, so Ly = L – Lz • We study: • Initial comp. adv, prod’n & trade, without & with trade costs; • Effects of unit cost reductions in one economy

  9. Figure 1: Patterns of specialization with no trade costs: three-country case

  10. Trade and transport costs • “Iceberg” assumption: only g < 1 of each export arrives at its destination • Country i will import if gci(z; vi) > cj(z; vj), i.e. ci > cj/g • Some import-competing goods are produced but not traded • Less international specialization

  11. Figure 2: Patterns of specialization with trade costs

  12. Figure 3: Effects of unit cost reductions in country B

  13. Comparative changes in production and trade: summary Initial case with trade costs After unit cost reductions in country B

  14. Consequences of Asian regional intgrtn • Growth in B’s exports and its imports of manuf inputs and nat res • Upper-middle-income economy (“C”): • Loses comp. adv. in its most L-intensive sectors • Manufactured exports become more skill-intensive • Res. boom raises w/r, reinforcing rise in skill-intensity of z • E.g. Thailand, Malaysia: rise of fragmentation trade • Low-income economy (“A”): • Loses comp. adv. in its most skill-intensive sectors • But res. boom raises w/r, reducing comp. adv. in its most L-intensive manufactures (cf. Dutch disease) • E.g. Indonesia

  15. Does Indonesia’s resource wealth prevent industrialization?

  16. Overview • Skills-based (SB) exports and development • What determines growth of SB exports? International evidence • Indonesia’s record in SB export growth • Through time • In regional perspective • Support from firm-level data (quick review) • Some policy implications

  17. Skills-based exports & economic growth • ‘Moving up’ from basic manufactures to skills-based (SB) products supports economic growth • Elastic foreign demand, relatively stable prices • Strong complementarities with supply of ‘high-powered’ investments (FDI, skills/human capital) • Intra-industry spillovers: factor productivity; ‘cost discovery’ • For low-mid income countries, higher “sophistication level” of exports assoc. with faster GDP growth • 10% incr. in sophistication level of exports raises GDP growth by 0.35 – 0.37% (Hausmann, Hwang & Rodrik 2007). • Expansion of skills-based exports has been a defining characteristic of E & SE Asian growth successes

  18. SB exports: international evidence • Exports from dev. countries are > 22% world trade in SB products, but only a few countries participate in this trade • What determines success as an exporter of SB products? • We hypothesize: Δ(SB/total exports) = ƒ(FDI+, Human cap.+, Nat res. wealth-, Inst’l strength+, Infrastructure+, Asia-Pacific+) • UN Comtrade, net export data: 103 countries, 1985-2005 in 5-year intervals • Estimation method: panel data regression with region and time period controls

  19. See paper for complete results

  20. Model overpredicts Indonesian SB exports Coxhead and Li (2008): cross country counterfactual highlights FDI and H

  21. Indonesia and its neighbors: structure of export growth

  22. Why are Indonesia’s SB exports low? • Initial conditions: resource wealth, human and other capital endowments • 1998-2001: krismon/kristal and transition to democracy • External challenges: rise of China/India • “New” resource curse threat • Erosion of comparative advantage in low-tech mfg • Policy-related reasons • Poor performance on FDI and human capital • Loss of momentum on trade policy reforms • High transactions costs in shipping, customs, labor markets

  23. Initial conditions: FDI and H endowments

  24. Trade, FDI and growth: micro evidence • Globally: “What you export matters” • Positive productivity and growth linkages from SB goods in cross- country product line data (Hausmann, Hwang & Rodrik 2007) • Studies using Indonesian firm-level data • Positive association between exports and firm-level productivity growth (Sjoholm 1999; Blalock and Gertler 2004) • Foreign-invested firms hire better-educated workers, and • For given education, they pay substantial wage premia to both blue collar and white collar workers (Lipsey and Sjoholm 2004) • Foreign-invested firms are more productive and generate intra- industry spillovers— when technologies used are similar to local firms (Takii 2005)

  25. Implications for development & policy • SB production is a source of ‘high-powered’ growth • Confers productivity externalities • Stimulates other investments • Diversifies export base (reduces vulnerability) • SB exports are a vaccine for Dutch Disease? • But progress in SB export growth requires • Low trade costs (re: tariffs and transport costs) • Efficient and flexible labor markets • Positive FDI environment • Support for risk-taking entrepreneurs

  26. Policy reasons: inefficiency (ranking, N=181) • Data from Athukorala and Hill 2010 APEL Table 4

  27. Any policy implications? • Reduce trade, transport and transactions costs for all trade-oriented firms • Relatively speaking, support trade-oriented firms and firms with foreign investments or partnerships • FDI raises productivity of labor in general • Productivity benefits spill over to domestic firms • Wage premium means workers have incentives to train • Relatively speaking, support firms producing more highly differentiated products • Niches can be identified • Demand is elastic • Support innovators, but not followers

  28. Tomorrow • Labor mobility and human capital

More Related