1 / 20

National Acute Medicine Programme 2010

National Acute Medicine Programme 2010. Shane O’Neill & Garry Courtney. Why is Acute Medicine the priority?. Trolleys waits and poor patient experience Preventable mortality - 1 per day in stroke Limited access to senior decision makers

raiden
Download Presentation

National Acute Medicine Programme 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Acute Medicine Programme 2010 Shane O’Neill & Garry Courtney

  2. Why is Acute Medicine the priority? • Trolleys waits and poor patient experience • Preventable mortality - 1 per day in stroke • Limited access to senior decision makers • Cost – acute medicine using more beds than is required (1/2 of beds, 2/3 costs) • Impact on other services e.g. elective surgery

  3. Key features of National Clinical Care Programmes • All based on generating gains in quality, access and cost • Similar to national cancer programme • Jointly led with Colleges and DQCC • GPs, Consultants, Nursing, AHPs and Patients embedded in programme • Similar methodology

  4. 1 2 3 Define key issues & solutions 4 5 6 7 8 Scope the program Measure & analyse performance Sustain & improve performance Detailed solution design Initiate program Set Goals Validate solutions Implement solutions 2 4 1 3 Checkpoints with the Program Advisory Group, the Director of Quality & Clinical Care and Steering group

  5. Acute Medicine Programme This Programme will ensure that all acute medical patients will experience : • expedited diagnosis, • the correct treatment, • an appropriate environment, • respect of their autonomy and privacy, • timely care from a senior medical doctor working within a dedicated multidisciplinary team,

  6. Objectives • Quality: Reduce the admission rate of medical patients by 10% to 50% without increasing 30 day readmission • Access: Every medical patient presenting to the hospital will be seen by a senior medical doctor (i.e. consultant/specialist registrar/registrar) within one hour • Cost: Generate medical bed day savings of 10% per year for 3 years post full implementation Currently use 1,265,671 acute medical bed days p.a. i.e. 3465 beds Year 1: 10% reduction = 350 beds saved Year 2: 10% reduction = 700 beds saved (cumulative) Year 3: 10% reduction = 1,050 beds saved (cumulative)

  7. Trolley issue • In the worst month of this year to date (i.e. January) the daily average of trolleys was 157 (HSE) • (INMO average for month of January = 283) • Year 1 bed savings will solve trolley problem.

  8. Are bed savings achievable? Decrease in AvLOS by 1 day each year for the next 3 years i.e. from 9 to 6 days (which brings all hospitals to performance of the current top 25%): • 4% - awaiting consultant decision to discharge (AEP, 2008) • 8% - of inappropriate admissions due to inability to access diagnostics as out-patient (AEP, 2008) • Increase weekend discharges • Increase proportion of LOS <72 hours

  9. Why is this different? • Driven by quality agenda • Clinically led, taking a whole system approach • Multi-disciplinary team selected by their professions • Multi-programme approach allowing integrated solution e.g. AMP links with ED, Critical Care, Surgery, Care of the Elderly, Diagnostics, etc., jointly led with Colleges, with widespread consultation and support • Acute Medicine Programme team follows through on implementation

  10. Patient Pathway (Phase 1) Blue Print 1 Patient information web site Patient Self Management 16 Ambulatory Ambulance Triage and/or EWS 17 23 3 Emergency Department Critical Care (ICU/CCU) Chronic Disease watch Triage and/or EWS 12 13 2 GP/Primary Care Team 10 Acute Medicine Unit Initial Assessment Community Intervention Team & other care in the home services 11 Clinical Prioritisation: EWS 4 Regional patient navigation hub service 19 14 Surgical Assessment Unit Diagnostics 5 Out Reach Service 20 Working Diagnosis 6 Out patients Elective Surgery Emergency Surgery 21 18 7 Rapid Access Clinics Specialist Units/Centres e.g. Stroke, Heart Failure, Epilepsy, PCI, etc Care plan 8 Day Care Centre 9 Rehab services 1 15 22 24 4 Discharge management Medical Short Stay Unit Admission Hospital retrieval/transfer 25 2 3 EWS Hospital Network 26 Specialist Wards Hospice/ Palliative Care 27 Pathway enablement and sustainability

  11. Key features of the Programme • Hospital models (1,2,3,4 in order of increasing acuity) • Acute Medical Units, Acute Medical Assessment Units and Medical Assessment Units • National Early Warning Score • Rapid access to out-patients • Navigation hub/bed bureau and Case Manager • Metrics • New working practices/continuous presence • New approach to education, training and development • Retrieval service

  12. Who benefits – Patients, Clinicians, Management, representative groups • Strengthens future for local hospitals by enhanced non emergency role. Increased volume of services provided in model 2 hospitals which will be developed as centres of excellence for day surgery, chronic disease management and rehabilitation. Chronic diseases are the commonest cause of death and severe illness and include diabetes, asthma, emphysema/bronchitis, heart disease and stroke. • Same day access to key services e.g. AMU/AMAU/MAU, imaging, endoscopies, laboratory, etc. • Contribute to improvement in trolley issues • Rapid access to senior decision maker

  13. Patient benefits All acute medical patients will receive an expedited diagnosis and the correct treatment, administered in an appropriate environment, respectful of their autonomy and privacy, by a senior medical doctor working within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. • No patient will be cared for on a trolley for an extended period • All patients will get the correct treatment in the appropriate setting • Unnecessary delays and duplication in assessment, diagnosis and treatment will be prevented • All patients will be seen by a senior medical doctor (consultant, specialist registrar or registrar) within 1 hour • All key decisions will be reviewed by a consultant • The patient and family/carers will be afforded the opportunity to have discussions with the consultant

  14. Hospital models • The National Clinical Programmes propose models for 4 levels of acute hospitals in relation to acute medicine patients • These are generic models • The specifics of implementation and staffing arrangements for each model will be agreed locally in consultation with the Programme • The purpose of the models is to enhance the safe provision of patient care relating to available facilities and staffing • The level of service which can be safely provided in any hospital will determine which model applies • Protects patients and staff

  15. Hospital models (continued) Model 4: tertiary hospital Model 3: general hospital Model 2: local hospital with selected (GP-referred) medical patients, day surgery, diagnostics Model 1: community/district hospital 15

  16. Acute medical units There are 3 types of acute medical units which care for patients in different hospital models. Model 4 hospitals have an AMU, which is a facility whose primary function is the immediate and early specialist management of adult patients (i.e. aged 16 and older) with a wide range of medical conditions who present to hospitals (+ medical short stay unit, MSSU) Model 3 hospitals have an AMAU (-MSSU) Model 2 hospitals have an MAU (-MSSU)   16

  17. Implementation strategy

  18. High level implementation approach 1. No.1 HSE/DoHC priority for 2011 (incl. for HR, IT, etc) 2. Business case & Implementation plan (next 6 weeks) 3. Expressions of interest (8 – 12 weeks) 4. Prioritisation and triage into 5 work-streams • Critical Care • Ambulance • Diagnostics • Facilitated support • Education and training (www.jrcptb.org.uk) 5. Baseline current performance vs key targets 6. Diagnostic & Gap analysis 7. Local implementation planning 8. Plan sign-off 9. Progress reporting 10. Monitoring

  19. Key Risks 1. New working practices for doctors, nurses, therapists 2. Phased implementation will lose momentum 3. Staffing requirements (Consultants) 4. Matching trainees to consultant posts in new training scheme 5. Conflict with other services due to resource limitation 6. Ambulance requirements 7. Unrealistic expectations 8. Discharge delays 9. Removal of beds ahead of the programme timelines 10 Need to provide additional resources in current economic climate

  20. Key questions • Medicine/Surgery in model 2 – pre selected, ACLS, EWS and Retrieval • Critically ill patient in model 2 – Pre-selected, EWS, ACLS, Rotation and Retrieval • NCHD training/skill sets (Network/Integrated Service Area rotation) • Acute Medicine Training Scheme (Acute Med as primary specialty or combined with another relevant specialty) • Funding stream • HIQA/licensing 2012

More Related