1 / 17

Methods of Costing Facilities & Labour

Methods of Costing Facilities & Labour. …technology & work-centre specific. By David Reuss. So where is the case that demands the need for ‘Work-Centre specific’ cost rates?. Why should a Customer care about such detail?

ranae
Download Presentation

Methods of Costing Facilities & Labour

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Methods of Costing Facilities & Labour …technology & work-centre specific. By David Reuss

  2. So where is the case that demands the need for ‘Work-Centre specific’ cost rates? • Why should a Customer care about such detail? • Surely a Customer just wants to pay the cheapest price, whilst getting the right product or service in return? • Why should a Supplier need anything other than a wrap-rate for a facility? • So long as he gets back his ‘costs’ over a year and makes at least a satisfactory profit, what does he care?

  3. Lets not forget... • Of course, some Suppliers involved with military customer work (e.g. DoD) are already required to agree facility cost rates (wrap rates) inclusive of engineering and fabrication overheads, • and where a Supplier is involved in both military & civil work – conflicts need to be managed. • So, in the same spirit as on military work, why shouldn’t the civil Customer get a handle on a Supplier’s Costs? • Especially if customer work-load is significant to the Supplier. • And of course, the Supplier may want better resolution of costs for themselves, e.g.: • For helping to identify which machines are more profitable than others, or • Where the waste is in the business.

  4. Profits being pulled Customer Supplier The situation: • Customers & Suppliers suffering ever reducing margins. • This calls-for an Ability to predict Fair & Reasonable Cost-Rates. • For the Supplier, this means: • Ensuring that true costs are accounted for and that profit margins are demonstrable and fair. • Access to a more effective business analysis tool – assisting future business strategy development and capital purchases. • And for the Customer, ensuring that: • they have a view as to what the market should be paying, and • that which is viewed to be fair, reasonable & affordable.

  5. A Case in point... From a Supplier's perspective • Assume a supplier has a wrap rate of £50/hr • Then invests in a state-of the art machine, which should rightly have a cost rate for itself of say £300/hr. • However, the supplier prefers to maintain a wrap-rate business, and due to load, forecasts a revised wrap rate of say £65/hr as a result. • This may then burden jobs with cost from the new investment that it may never benefit from – and hence may cause the supplier to appear uncompetitive for such products. • Wrap rates tend to also disguise in-efficiencies and poorly loaded capital. • Hence, if investment was correct for business (especially in cases where investment was high), then it makes sense for the supplier to charge rates according to ‘True’ costs. • Having a transparent relationship with important customers makes it easier to persuade when they come looking for price reductions too. • Regrettably, some suppliers even apply wrap rates that are perceived necessary in order to win the business... And remain blind to the mounting losses that can sometimes follow.

  6. A Case in point... From a Customer's perspective • Having sight to the construction used by a main supplier, in the build up of the rates, will: • assist appreciation of the difficulties experienced by that business and • will assist in the long term planning of sourcing strategies. • It is also highly desirable when comparing suppliers from pan global locations: • where risks associated with sourcing in presently low cost labour countries (e.g. India and China) can be better analysed and • impact risk assessments made.

  7. Making predictions of Work-Centre specific Cost Rates – the ingredients. • Whilst taking it from a Cost Engineer’s perspective, rather than a purist financial controller. • A dive into the deep end… • With emphasis on • Direct Labour • Indirect costs, & • Work-Centre costs.

  8. Purchased Parts, Consumables and Material Cost • External spend • Purchase Burden (if not in Indirect Costs) • Cost of Money (due to stock burn-off) • Process Related Scrap impact on lost purchases. Manuf. Cost Work-Center Specific cost rates * Process Costs Process Operation Times (Cycle Run Times and Set-Up) Batch Lead-Time cost-of-money Logistics Cost paid by Supplier Tooling Costs & other NRC Margin/Profit * SEE FURTHER SLIDES FOR BREAK-DOWN Price Modelling Map Estimated Recurring Piece Price

  9. Direct Labour Cost Rate Rates applied to Set-Up & Run Operations Indirect – Shop Labour Indirect Cost Rate Indirect – Office Labour Indirect – Buildings & Other costs Equipment cost rate Recovering Fixed & Variable costs Cost Rate Map Work-Centre specific Cost Rate

  10. Direct Labour Cost Rate Cost Rate Map - elements Basic Pay (per hour) – work-centre skill level specific. Operator Quantity – normal operation (Work-Centre specific, can be < or > 1). Shift premium Allowances Fringe costs (Holiday, Sick Pay & Training costs - as lost time to business) Co. National Insurance contributions (Gov. / State Taxes) Pension Contributions

  11. Shop Indirect Labour • Shop Indirect & Tech Support resources, Covering either: • Whole Factory / business • Cell • Work-Centre Pay & Benefits (p.a.) For ALL resources (as per Direct Operative) Divided by corresponding factory Hours for area covered Office Indirect Labour Office Indirect Resources (rest of business) - Non specific to area or Work-Centre (e.g. S.G&A) Pay & Benefits (p.a.) For ALL resources (as per Direct Operative) Divided by total annual factory Hours for business Other Indirect Operating Business Budgets (not Labour) including: Admin.; Marketing; Travel; Training; Insurance; Telephone & postage; Non-specific Transportation; Consultancy; etc. Equipment Costs including: Office Equipment; I.T.; Shop Equipment Misc.; Stores Equipment (if not recovered via separate purchasing overhead). Divided by total annual factory Hours for business • Costs p.a. per square metre, covering: • Local Gov. Taxes (incl. Rates); • Building rental Costs (as applicable); & • Space Heat, Light, Utilities and Maintenance. Office Area (plus stores and all other indirect areas) Divided by total annual factory Hours for business X Buildings – Indirect Cost Rate Map - elements Indirect Cost Rate

  12. Variable Cost Rate p.Hr Total Energy and Utility costs per hour Divided by Accounting policy Depreciation years. Divided by total Worked* Equipment Hours p.a. Acquisition Costs (inclusive of Installation) Capital Depreciation Costs p. Hr Divided by total Worked* Equipment Hours p.a. Acquisition Costs (with installation cost) / 2 Loan interest rate Cost of Money – shown as a rate p.Hr. Current Year Valuation OR X • Costs p.a. per square metre, covering: • Local Gov. Taxes (incl. Rates); • Building rental Costs (as applicable); & • Space Heat, Light, Utilities and Maintenance. Equipment Foot Print Area (inclusive of gang-ways allowance) -1 Shop Floor effective Utilisation Divided by total Worked* Equipment Hours p.a. Shop-Floor Cost Rate p.Hr X X * ‘Worked Equipment Hours p.a.’ makes allowances for planned and unplanned down-time and equipment Utilisation within year. Cost Rate Map - elements Equipment cost rate

  13. Methods for Costing Facilities & LabourSummary • Analysing costs in more detail can be of benefit to both Suppliers and Customers. • As profit margins become ever more stretched, by endeavours from both sides of a negotiation, and as safety-nets get thinned out by: • classical price reductions, • design optimisation and • lean manufacturing process improvement initiatives, … so we need to be prepared to make use of such magnifying glasses upon our businesses. • Today’s Integrated Teams (from the customer and supplier)are working together – with the intent of mutual benefit. • Assisting this process then is making available better quality representation and understanding of what the ‘true costs’ are, and by sharing them with your supply-chain partners.

  14. Important points for consideration • Cost Apportionment • Depreciation of Work-Centre acquisition costs: • Straight-Line or Current year valuation? • Fixed period depreciation or over Equipment Useful Life? • Building costs (space heat, light & other general utilities): • Charged to: specific Work-Centres, Cells, or Factories? • And then apportioned by: Floor area or factory hours? • Purchase handling costs, charged by: • Fixed fee per transaction, or • Flat rate % for all purchases, against purchase order value? or • Charging actual costs back to specific order or commodity group? • Overheads (Engineering or ‘Sales General & Admin’): • Charged by factory hours? Or • Should costs be weighted to programmes, or other areas of business?

  15. Important points for consideration • Virtual Factories • Where a customer is trying to predict costs as seen by a specific type of supplier, within a commodity group or sector of the manufacturing industry, they can create what are called ‘Virtual Suppliers and Virtual Factories’. • Behind such would lie a generic financial representation of such an entity. • Utilisation – Equipment, Buildings, Labour • All fixed costs to the business need to be effectively utilised. • But the cost of under-utilisation needs to recovered too. • Plus, assuming equipment use is reasonably optimised (e.g. set-up or maintenance down-time) then these ‘non-added value’ costs shouldn’t be forgotten either. • What’s a Direct Operation? • Whilst using Work-Centre specific cost rates, one has to be sure that all ‘True Costs’ are recovered within direct operation identifications and time generations.

  16. Important points for consideration • Accounting for direct operatives doing indirect duties • Not all direct operatives work on 100% directly chargeable duties, they do indirect duties too. • Such indirect duties need to be recovered within corresponding indirect shop accounts, without double-accounting. • Dealing with automation vs man-hours for apportionment • Clearly, where factory hours are used for apportionment purposes, one needs to account for all hours that can be sold. • Hence, automated equipment need to be charged. • Clearly most firms will have a mixture of pure labour and automated processes. • Over-time • Over-time, although paid at a premium to the Operative, can have cheaper rates applied to their working, in comparison to normal time. • This logic is based on how all fixed costs within the business should be recovered within the ‘normal time’ factory hours expected to be worked within a financial year.

  17. Important points for consideration • Lead-time cost of money, and Inventory holding costs. • Capital investment normally brings with it a Loan. • The cost of the loan (arrangement and interest charged by the lender) is cost-of-money. • This real cost is recurring too, and so proportional to Product lead-times. • Inventory holding costs, however, are a non-recurring saving where reductions are made. • The act of eliminating waste within a manufacturing process may, if no quality improvements are made: • make significant lead-time improvement, but • yield only modest recurring cost savings – due to the ‘cost of money’ savings on interest costs… • These impressive lead-time improvements can some-times be confused as being proportional to product cost reduction too.

More Related