260 likes | 267 Views
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos. Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube collaboration). ~1 km. Digital Optical Module. IceTop. IceTop. AMANDA. 1450m. 60 DOMs. 400ns/6.4 m s time range 400 photoelectron/15ns
E N D
The IceCube Neutrino Telescopeand its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube collaboration)
~1 km Digital Optical Module IceTop IceTop AMANDA 1450m 60 DOMs • 400ns/6.4ms time range • 400 photoelectron/15ns • measure individual photon arrival time • 1~2ns time resolution 2450m The IceCube Detector
The IceCube collaboration Antarctica
and more This year’s strings deep in ice Toward 70 strings - km3 detector 9 strings and 16 ice-top stations have been deployed ~125m AMANDA
Where Are EHE Neutrinos From? GZK neutrino nm • The standard scenario m EHE-CR p • EHE cosmic-ray • induced neutrinos • The main energy range: En ~ 109-10 GeV nm ne e Beyond the Standard Model X • Exotic scenarios • Top-Down neutrinos • decays/interaction of massive particles • (topological defects, SUSY, micro black hole, …) • The main energy range: En ~ 1011-15 GeV
t t ng EHE Events in the Earth CR • General neutrino event ID a through the Earth up-going events • Earth is opaque for EHE neutrino • EHE neutrino induced events are coming from above as down-going down-going m EHE n m m,t m,t m North ng m EHE neutrino mean free path ln ~ 100 km << REarth sccnN ~ 10-6~-4 mb up-going nm nm < 1PeV > PeV
EHE Spectrum in Ice GZK neutrino induced lepton and atmospheric muon fluxes at the IceCube depth EGZK >> EAtmm S. Yoshida et. al. (2004) Phys. Rev. D 69 103004
e+e- p e+e- photo-nuclear m g pair-creation bremsstrahlung EHE Track in Detection Volume m and t tracks lose there energy by ‘radiative processes’
Muon Events m ~17m m m 9 EeV 100 TeV m
NPE Number of photo-electrons (NPE) … an integrated waveform charge divided by single pe charge Correlated with number of photons at source a in-ice particle energy
Contained or Uncontained Events with the same energy ~ 30PeV contained High npe: 107 npe uncontained Low npe: 1000 npe
t m contained contained Log Npe GZK m Atmospheric m GZK t E-1 fluxes 107 1010 [GeV] 107 1010 [GeV] 107 1010 [GeV] NPE Energy Distribution
NPE Distribution Distribution difference between the signals and background! GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m
Zenith Angle Distribution • Signals peak at horizontal direction • Background distribute over down-going region down up GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m
Preliminary Event Selection Atmospheric m GZK m GZK t
Event Rate with completed detector GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m IceCube Preliminary GZK m0.35events/year GZK t0.31 events/year Atmospheric m0.033events/year GZK: S. Yoshida et. al. (1997) ApJ 479:547 (m=4, Zmax=4)
Event Rate: 9 strings and more GZK m Atmospheric m GZK t string numbers 9 20 40 60 80 Rate [/year] 107 109[GeV] 107 109[GeV] event rate (integrated) IceCube Preliminary 9 string event rate GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m GZK m+t0.13 events/year Atmospheric m 0.009 events/year The same cut for all string numbers 80 S 9 S
Effective Area for EHE signals with completed detector Twice larger charged lepton effective area than physical area for >1010 GeV m t 80 S IceCube Preliminary 0.5 < q < 1.0 -0.25 < q < 0.25 -1.0 < q < -0.5 up-going horizontal down-going
How Many Photons Are We Seeing? The in-ice energy calibration Standard-Candle - Photon source with known absolute intensity for each pulse Golden-DOMs - Absolute calibrated DOMs near SC SC on s40 GD on s39
The Absolute Chain: Standard Candle 4 Golden DOM SC • Known position and shape • Nitrogen (337 nm) pulsed laser • Cone reflected resembles cascades • Pointing-up • 1-10 PeV ne cascade equiv. GD GD • Absolute calibrated with nitrogen 337 nm laser • distance from SC 132, 233, 248 m • relative angle to SC -11.9, 56.2, 58.4 deg SC 130.04m
CR m m IceTop: Background Tagging A real event example (E~ 100TeV-10 PeV) • Major background is atmospheric (bundled) muons of which in-ice nature still not well known at this energy regime • Tagging on the surface muons with surface array for an additional information EHE n m,t
Conclusion -outlook- • The largest multi-string neutrino detector! • IceCube is capable of EHE neutrino search with this year’s configuration and the capability is growing with its string array • The first-level EHE event selection from BG can be achieved using measured number of photo-electrons • Energy and geometry reconstruction incl. that of uncontained events, technique using photon propagation information in ice (waveforms) to come • Power of subsystems – calibration and background rejection
benchmarking model Extremely High Energy Neutrino Targets GZK: S. Yoshida et. al. (1997) ApJ 479:547 (m=4, Zmax=4) TD: Sigl et. al.(1999), nUHEn2K: S.Yoshida et al.(1998), AGN Jet: K.Mannheim (1995)
MC Setup • Benchmarking models • GZK muon and tau signals • Atmospheric muon background (no bundle) • muon and tau propagation starts from outside of detection volume • Event energy range 105 < E < 1011 GeV • E-1 and E-2 fluxes(~10k events each)
Effective Area: toward 80 strings in-ice m:108 GeV in-ice t: 108 GeV up-going horizontal down-going Effective area enlarged with string numbers for every event direction IceCube Preliminary m:1011 GeV t:1011 GeV 9 string effective area 80 S 9 S