1 / 1

References

Figure 1 : NO x /O 3 schematic In the presence of VOCs (From Atkinson, 2000). Coke Plant. U.S. Pipe. Smelter. Performance. Target Compounds. ECIP-FTIR Objectives. Flow Diagram.

rea
Download Presentation

References

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Figure 1:NOx/O3 schematic In the presence of VOCs (From Atkinson, 2000) Coke Plant U.S. Pipe Smelter Performance Target Compounds ECIP-FTIR Objectives Flow Diagram Figure 4: The ECIP-FTIR Flow Schematic. Red highlight  Continuous Flow Green highlight  Batch Sampling Purple highlight  QA/QC Application of Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Cryogenic Preconcentration: Laboratory Results and ApplicationsPatrick I. Buckley1, David A. Bowdle2, Michael J. Newchurch11Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville, 2Earth System Science Center - Retired • Introduction • Chemistry • Both anthropogenic and natural sources emit VOCs into the urban atmosphere • VOCs react with either nitrite radicals at night or hydroxyl radicals during the day to produce reactive organic peroxy molecules • Increased peroxy molecules result in increased production of ozone (Atkinson, 2000) • During the evening, NOx chemistry becomes the driver (Warneke et al., 2004)NO + O3 NO2 + O2NO2 + O3  NO3 + O2NO2 + NO3↔ N2O5OH + NO  HONO OH + NO2  HNO3 • Early morning photolysis of HONO results in rapid increase in OH, jumpstarting urban photochemisty • Health • VOCs have direct adverse affects on human health (Andersson et al., 1997) • Production of O3 by VOCs reaction processes (Devlin et al., 1997) • Regulation • 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments list 188 VOCs as hazardous air pollutants • Currently monitored via Compendium Method TO-15 • 24-hour collection of ambient samples in SUMA canisters • Analysis of samples at centralized testing facilities • Problem: Some VOCs have appreciable degradation during storage (Kelly and Holdren, 1995) ECIP-FTIR Methodology • Laboratory Results • Cryogenic Performance • During routine operations, the ECIP-FTIR preconcentrates batch samples within the cryotrap. The typical cooling cycle reduces the temperature of the cryotrap to 100 K (-173 °C). Heater coils maintain this temperature remotely. At present, the ECIP-FTIR cryogenic system is capable of reaching a range of temperatures. • Laboratory spectra illustrate the ECIP-FTIR has • Adequate spectral resolution to identify trace pollutants in laboratory air • Good instrument sensitivity • The capability to quantify multiple compounds in complex calibration and in-air mixtures Figure 5: Cryocoolerefficiency. The blacktrace is the coldheadtemperature. The blue and red traces are trap temperatures at two differentpositions along the stack. Figure 6: Laboratory spectrum of methanol in Air. The blue trace is the measured spectrum. Thegreen trace is a deconvolved high-resolutionlibrary spectrum. Figure 3: The ECIP-FTIR Instrument Layout. Panel A shows the entire instrument layout. From left to right, the FTIR, cryocooler, and electronics compartment with operations PC can be seen. Panel B shows the fluid subsystem including flow passages, inlet pumps, and shut off and flow selection valves. Panel C shows the optical subsystem with emphasis on the FTIR and gas cell. Panel D show the cryogenic subsystem and QA/QC manifold along with mass flow controllers (green boxes). Panel E shows the data acquisition system and mass flow junction boxes. Birmingham Field Study Batch Sampling– Four-hour preconcentration at 2 LPM; Detection Limits > 10 pptv • Improve temporal coverage Continuous operation vs. 1 in 6 • Improve temporal resolution 4-hour batch, 15-minute cont. flow • Improve data latency  Near-real-time products • Improve chemical specificity  One analyzer for all IR-active gases • Improve user interaction  Mobile, autonomous, non-specialist • Reduce life cycle costs  Low annual, comparable start up • Maintain or improve data quality  Meet EPA detection limits, on-board QA/QC • Maintain or improve traceability  Innovation while using EPA-approved chemistry and physics • Through a collaboration with the Jefferson County Department of Health and Atmospheric Research and Analysis, the ECIP-FTIR will be deployed in North Birmingham (yellow box) October 2010 – March 2011. • This site is in close proximity to several industrial facilities, which frequently affect the air quality at the North Birmingham site. • Also in close proximity are North Birmingham Elementary and Lewis Elementary (green stars), illustrating the importance of air quality measurements in this area. Continuous Sampling– 15-minute resolution at 2 LPM; Detection Limits > 10 ppbv Volumetric Flow Rate • Presence of carbonyls  Source of hydroxyl radical • Presence of aromatics  Reacting with hydroxyl leading to O3formation • Presence of chlorinated compounds such as carbon tetracholoride (not shown)  Enhancement of VOC oxidation and HCl formation • NOx and O3 data from N. Birmingham along with ECIP-FTIR VOCs will provide valuable information about VOC sources, sinks, and processes Table 1: Comparison of key specifications from Apel et al. (2003) Fast GC/MS system, EPA Method TO-15 (1997), and the ECIP-FTIR Figure G: VOC data from N. Birmingham site collected from July 2005 – June 2006. Analysis followedEPA TO-15 GC/MS protocol. References Andersson, K. et al., 1997: TVOC and Health in Non-industrial Indoor Environments. Indoor Air, 7, 78-91.Apel, E. C. et al., 2003: A fast-GC/MS system to measure C2 to C4 carbonyls and methanol aboard aircraft. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8794-8806.Atkinson, R., 2000: Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx. Atmos. Environ., 34, 2063-2101.Devlin, R. B. et al., 1997: Health effects of ozone. Sci. Med., 8-17.Kelly, T. J. and M. W. Holdren, 1995: Applicability of canisters for sample storage in the determination of hazardous air pollutants. Atmos. Environ., 29, 2595-2608. Table 2: Average concentrations are from data collected between May 2005 and May 2006 in Birmingham, AL using EPA Method TO-15. (Data courtesy of R. Dillard, Jefferson County Department of Health, Birmingham, AL) Figure 2: ECIP-FTIR RMS signal to noise (SNR) vs. sample time (1024 scans = 60 minutes). Contact info: Patrick I. Buckley buckley@nsstc.uah.edu NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Annual Conference, 18 May 2010, Boulder, CO

More Related