1 / 6

1.8 m or 1 m Coils for Model Magnets?

1.8 m or 1 m Coils for Model Magnets?. M. Karppinen 7 March 2013. Magnet Assembly. With pre-assembled collar packs and half-yokes/yoke sections the complexity and the time to carry out the collar and yoke assembly are practically the same . Coil fabrication time is th e same for 1 m and 2 m.

reed-dale
Download Presentation

1.8 m or 1 m Coils for Model Magnets?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1.8 m or 1 m Coils for Model Magnets? M. Karppinen 7March 2013

  2. Magnet Assembly • With pre-assembled collar packs and half-yokes/yoke sections the complexity and the time to carry out the collar and yoke assembly are practically the same. • Coil fabrication time is the same for 1 m and 2 m 1930.97 1443 M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC

  3. Integrated Field Quality (1.8 m coils) • Magnetic iron cut-back: • >0.5 m magnetic straight section • More X-talk between apertures Courtesy of B. Auchmann M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC

  4. Magnet with 1 m coils • Cable UL 135 m • Easier potting (tooling qualification?) • Faster cool-down • Lower L • Fine for assessing quench performance • Gives qualitative idea of PC, ISCC, etc. • No magnetic straight section (accelerator quality?) • Very short coil straight section (layer-jump) • Tooling modifications • Curing and welding press for 2 m coils • Need new shells • Quench protection studies? • n hours of DO work M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC

  5. Magnet with 1.8 m coils • Uniform 2D field in the straight section • Tooling commissioned • Magnet parts in stock / in fabrication • No extra DO effort required • Better suited for protection studies • Better precision for PC, dynamic effects, etc. • Cable UL 220 m • Longer cooldown • Higher L M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC

  6. Conclusion • Shortening the model magnet coil length from 1.8 m to 1 m would require 85 m shorter cable unit length • Assembly process would be practically the same • At CERN curing and welding press would need to be reconfigured • Coil fabrication tooling would need to be modified or new part made • Mandrel, base plates, .. • Requires DO effort • Schedule and cost impact • We are fully geared up for 1.8 m coil production. • Training test would be somewhat faster with shorter recovery time after each quench • There would not be any magnetic straight section. • Very limited time to demonstrate the accelerator quality before the scale-up M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC

More Related