1 / 19

Internal Audit Department Orientation

Internal Audit Department Orientation. Manu Patel, Internal Audit Director Purvi Mody, Executive Director, Compliance and Internal Audit, Health System June 5, 2015. Audit and Compliance Committee (RPM 1.2, 7.3). A standing committee of the Board of Regents

reginam
Download Presentation

Internal Audit Department Orientation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internal Audit DepartmentOrientation Manu Patel, Internal Audit Director Purvi Mody, Executive Director, Compliance and Internal Audit, Health System June 5, 2015

  2. Audit and Compliance Committee(RPM 1.2, 7.3) • A standing committee of the Board of Regents • One member should be “financial expert” • Meets four or more times a year • Follows Open Meetings Act

  3. Audit and Compliance Committee(RPM 7.3) • Oversight Responsibilities for University’s: • Financial reporting • Internal controls • Risk management • Performance of external financial and internal auditors • Compliance with laws and regulations • Compliance program • Federal, state agencies audits and compliance reviews

  4. Authority of Internal Audit Dept. (IA) (RPM 7.2) • Was established to perform a comprehensive internal audit function • Has unrestricted access to all functions, records, property, and personnel • Obtains the necessary assistance of personnel • Communicates with personnel of internal, external, law enforcement agencies, etc.

  5. Independence • IA reports functionally to the Audit and Compliance Committee • Free from interference in determining the scope of internal auditing • Empowered to obtain the information needed • IA reports administratively to the University President

  6. Independence (cont.) • Health System Internal Audit reports administratively to the Chief Executive Officer and Administrator of Hospital Operations

  7. UNM Internal Audit Reporting Lines

  8. UNM Board of Regents Audit Committee of Each Entity and COO of the Health System (Steve McKernan) Internal Audit UNM Internal Audit (Manu Patel) HS Internal Audit (Purvi Mody) Health Sciences Center UNM Main Campus Health System • Branch Campuses, Affiliated entities (Foundation and Lobo Development, etc) School of Medicine, College of Nursing and Pharmacy Research (Cancer Center and HSC) UNM Hospitals and 57 Clinics UNM Cancer Center Clinics UNM Medical Group and 7 clinics UNM SRMC • UNM Internal Audit • Health System Internal Audit

  9. Report Functionally to the Committee The Committee reviews and approves UNM Internal Audit’s: • Risk based internal audit plan • Budget and resource plan • Work product: audit, consulting reports, etc. • Follow up report on management’s responses to audit recommendations • Health System IA reports functionally to Board of Trustees’ Audit and Compliance Committee

  10. Purpose and Scope of Work • Improve the University's operations • Determine whether the University's systems of controls, risk management, and governance, are adequate, and functioning properly to ensure: • Risks are identified and managed • Employees' actions are compliant with policies etc. • Resources are acquired economically, used efficiently, and adequately protected, etc.

  11. Investigation of Fraudulent Activity • University policy requires Internal Audit to conduct investigations of fraud and employee misconduct if financial • Will coordinate investigations of suspected fraudulent activities within the University

  12. Relevant UNM Policies • Policy 2200: Whistleblower Protection and Reporting Suspected Misconduct and Retaliation • Policy 7205: Dishonest or Fraudulent Activities

  13. Definition of Internal Auditing “…an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.” The Institute of Internal Auditors

  14. Assurance Services • We provide an independent assessment on governance, risk management, and control processes • Examples of assurance engagements: • management and performance • compliance • information technology • special requests • fraud

  15. Types of Assurance Engagements • Special Request from senior management or the Board of Regents • may result from concerns about a program, function or account • Fraud examination • initiated from irregularities identified during routine audit work, management who find fraud in their organizations, and complaints from various sources including the Hotline

  16. Risk Based Auditing • Focus on • risk of occurrences that could prevent the University from achieving its goals • areas with high risk where controls are not in place or are weak • Risk based audit plan • developed with input from across the University • based on available man hours • A university-wide 5-year plan is revisited annually

  17. IA Process of Audit Report • Management responds to the report with 3 required elements within 10 days • Management obtains its EVP’s approval • President approves management’s responses • Committee reviews and approves • Report is made public except exempted information

  18. Standards and Ethics • Adhere strictly to the Code of Ethics as established by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) • Abide by applicable standards made by IIA and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)

  19. Quality • IA must have a peer review at least once every five years • Last quality assessment was approved in March 2013

More Related