1 / 1

DEDICATION

DEDICATION. 81% received FilterWire, 13% SpideRx, and distal protection not possible in the remainder ST-segment resolution: 76% with embolic protection and 72% with PCI alone (p = 0.29) MACE: 5.4% with embolic protection and 3.2% with PCI alone (p = 0.17).

reidar
Download Presentation

DEDICATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEDICATION 81% received FilterWire, 13% SpideRx, and distal protection not possible in the remainder ST-segment resolution: 76% with embolic protection and 72% with PCI alone (p = 0.29) MACE: 5.4% with embolic protection and 3.2% with PCI alone (p = 0.17) Trial design:Patients with STEMI were randomized to embolic protection prior to PCI (n = 312) or PCI without embolic protection (n = 314). Results (p = 0.29) (p = 0.17) 76 72 % 5.4 3.2 Conclusions ST-resolution MACE • Embolic protection prior to PCI is not superior to PCI alone among patients with STEMI • Embolic protection does not improve ST-segment resolution or MACE PCI with embolic protection (n = 312) PCI with no embolic protection (n = 314) Kelbaek H, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:899-905

More Related