1 / 13

Measuring results - Experiences from Vietnam

Measuring results - Experiences from Vietnam. November 2016. Vietnam: At a glance. Limitations and challenges of the National M&E system for MNCH. Examples.

rharis
Download Presentation

Measuring results - Experiences from Vietnam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring results -Experiences from Vietnam November 2016

  2. Vietnam: At a glance

  3. Limitations and challenges of the National M&E system for MNCH

  4. Examples • A 5 year National maternal and newborn care programme had a list of indicators but had no specific M&E plan or no tool/method for data collection (e.g. % of mothers know at least 3 danger signs) • Tools and system are available (Maternal death surveillance) but there was limited training, poor monitoring and supervision • Technology: a software was developed for data management but out of date (not a web based design) and only 35 provinces could use this software among 63 provinces

  5. Examples • Quality of data: the figures reported from the regular health information system were still in favour of “high achievement” (far lower or higher than the figures from surveys). • Example: • Neonatal mortality: MOH: 3.29‰; MICS5: 11.95‰; • % of birth attended by trained health staff: regular report: >60%; Survey in the same communes: 14% • Challenges: motivation of the staff and payment method; a syndrome of “proud achievement”

  6. How do we measure?

  7. Model 1 • Method: Community score card to measure the quality of care from the user’s perspective • Strategies: Using people’s voices and people’s representative (People’s council)

  8. Provincial People’s Council Health sector District People’s Council Monitor District People’s Committee Voice/Accountability People Monitor Feedback

  9. Model 2 • Method: Client exit interview to measure the satisfaction of clients • Strategies: Using technology (mobile devices) to get un-biased feedback from the users

  10. Model 3 (GAC-funded project at design phase) • Method: Measuring access and utilization of prenatal, delivery and postnatal care using a M&E system • Strategies: Develop an app to be used on mobile phone which could support the village health workers to manage information related to the pregnant women in their villages.

  11. Data management Home visit Village health worker Group education Commune and district health centers

  12. How to influence policy? • Develop model, testing and sharing with the network (Reproductive health affinity group) and with MOH • Involve MOH at the start of the model development • Empower and use voices of civil society to advocate for change

More Related