1 / 20

2007 Enrollment by Benefit Type

2007 Enrollment by Benefit Type. Beneficiaries are selecting alternative design plan types. Data as of Jan07 Analysis excludes FBDE & LIS. 2007 Enrollment by Deductible Category. Beneficiaries are selecting plans with no deductible. Data as of Jan07 Analysis excludes FBDE & LIS.

rhys
Download Presentation

2007 Enrollment by Benefit Type

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2007 Enrollment by Benefit Type • Beneficiaries are selecting alternative design plan types. Data as of Jan07 Analysis excludes FBDE & LIS

  2. 2007 Enrollment by Deductible Category • Beneficiaries are selecting plans with no deductible. Data as of Jan07 Analysis excludes FBDE & LIS

  3. 2007 Enrollment by Premium Category • Beneficiaries are selecting plans with low or no premiums Data as of Jan07 Analysis excludes FBDE & LIS

  4. 2007 Enrollment by Gap Coverage • Coverage in the gap is not a significant factor in plan selection. Data as of Jan07 Analysis excludes FBDE & LIS

  5. 2008 Costs Continue to be Lower than Expected • Fewer Part D plans offerings in 2008 than 2007 • Plan offerings within a sponsor have more meaningful differences • Overall, premiums will be stable for many beneficiaries but slightly higher for some • 2008 standard average premium is $25 for basic coverage • Slow growth in Rx drug costs • Increased generic use • Effective plan negotiation • Competition

  6. Beneficiaries Continue to Have Multiple Low Cost PDP Choices • More than 90% of beneficiaries in stand-alone PDPs will have access to a plan in 2008 with premiums lower than they paid in 2007. • In every state, beneficiaries will have access to at least one PDP with premiums of less than $20, and a choice of at least 5 plans with premiums of less that $25 a month. • Beneficiaries in all states have access to a PDP with no drug deductible for a premium of less than $26 per month. • Beneficiaries in all states have access to PDP plans with coverage in the gap for generic drugs for under $50 a month.

  7. Beneficiaries Have Even Lower Cost MA-PD Choices • There are more MA-PD health plan offerings in 2008 than in 2007. • MA-PD premiums will average $11 lower than premiums for PDPs in 2008 (vs. $7 lower in 2007). • Over 90% of people with Medicare will have access to a MA-PD for a $0 premium and with a $0 drug deductible.

  8. Highlighted Improvements for 2008 • Benefit and Formulary Reviews • Enhanced specificity in PBP software • Negotiation of meaningful differences & outliers • Systems Improvements • LIS data exchanged among CMS, States and SSA • Ability to correct data in CMS systems • “4Rx” data mandatory on plan-generated enrollments • Automation of plan TrOOP balance transfer processes • Performance Metrics • Additional measures developed • Increased transparency through integration with Drug Plan Finder

  9. More Robust Formulary Reviews • Prevent discrimination against beneficiaries by age, disease, or setting (e.g. long-term care) • Utilize reasonable benchmarks to check that drug lists are robust • Review tiering and utilization management strategies • Identify potential outliers at each review step for further CMS investigation and obtain reasonable clinical justification when outliers appear to create access problems • Ensure minimum transition coverage policies

  10. 2007 vs. 2008 Formularies (PDP) Note: Adjusted for drugs comparable on both the 2007 and 2008 Medicare Formulary Reference Files.

  11. 2007 vs. 2008 Formularies (PDP) Note: Data limited to plans offered both in 2006 and 2007. Excludes employer sponsored plans. Formulary data from 2006 as of 4/20/2006, and 2007 as of 7/5/2006.

  12. The Power of Part D Performance Metrics • Establishes performance benchmarks: • CMS’ long-term goal is to establish performance benchmarks based on historical experience with Part D • Once benchmarks are established, CMS will work with plans to improve performance • If high performance in an area becomes standard for all plans then a measure may be retired • CMS will have composite scores for monitoring purposes beginning Nov. 15, 2007. • Creates a feedback loop

  13. Example: Monitoring of Drug Pricing • CMS has a current performance metric to measure drug price changes. • The average drug increase in the CPI (Feb. –Aug. 2006) was 5%. • 13% of PDP drug prices exceeded the CPI increase. • Plans were given a high rating if they had a lower percentage (<22%) exceeding the CPI. • Plans were given a low rating if they had a higher percentage (>33%) exceeding the CPI. • 7 PDPs and 34 MA-PDs received low ratings (1 or 2 stars).

  14. Performance Measure in MPDPF – Domain Level

  15. Performance Measure in MPDPF – Measures Level

  16. Performance Measure in MPDPF – Data Level

  17. LIS-Eligible Beneficiaries and Reassignment • CMS re-assigns LIS eligible beneficiaries who are enrolled in plans that will no longer have a premium within a $1.00 of LIS premium subsidy benchmark • Also to those whose plans are leaving Medicare program • No major problems in 2007 • For 2008, 1 in 6 dual eligible beneficiaries may switch to a new plan to avoid a premium increase

  18. LIS Outreach to Those Who Will Face a Change in 2008 • Re-assignment Notices (blue) provide information on: • Moving to the new plan • Staying in the current plan • Selecting a different plan • New “Chooser” Notices (tan) provide information on: • Premium responsibility for 2008 • Zero premium plans available • Evaluating plan options

  19. LIS Outreach to Those Who Haven’t Applied for Extra Help “The Community is Coming Together” • LIS national kick-off and partner meetings • Data-sharing for targeting outreach • New materials – “Photo novellas” • Stronger partnerships • Community outreach

More Related