1 / 17

EHS 27 Performing an Effective Safety Walkaround Engineering Division

EHS 27 Performing an Effective Safety Walkaround Engineering Division. Safety Walkarounds. Objective: make operations safe to avoid injury This is done is by helping one another to make comprehensive observations to review and improve work processes A key element is layered pairs

Download Presentation

EHS 27 Performing an Effective Safety Walkaround Engineering Division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EHS 27 Performing an Effective Safety Walkaround Engineering Division

  2. Safety Walkarounds • Objective: make operations safe to avoid injury • This is done is by helping one another to make comprehensive observations to review and improve work processes • A key element is layered pairs • Get first line worker involvement • Workers are most knowledgeable about the work • Engage for an exchange of ideas and stimulate active thinking. • Rotate and mix observers • Different people bring in different perspectives and integrate with worker knowledge

  3. Behavior Observation Categories • Reactions • This relates people’s (dis)comfort and feeling about the management system. • PPEs from head to toe • Are people adequately protective from risks or hazards in the work environment? • Body positions and motions • Relative to hazards in the workplace can include what can people strike against, be struck by, fall from, be caught between or under, exposure to hazardous materials or environments and/or repetitive motions and stresses • Tools and equipment • Are they appropriate for the job, are they in good condition, are they being used appropriately? • Housekeeping and orderliness • Poor housekeeping, disorder and clutter make doing safe work more difficult • Work Process and Procedures • Are work processes in place, adequate, understood and being followed? Are people comfortable work process in helping people perform the job without an injury. Are procedures in place to define the work, how to do it and what the hazards are?

  4. The Walkaround Process • Plan for effectiveness • What kind of work will you be looking at? • Where? • What are the most significant hazards in the area? • Have a focus in mind • Validating ISM • Guidance Cards / Checklist Areas • Avoiding the herd • Need for matrix management involvement • 2 people best, 3 OK, 4 iffy, 5 serious herding • Paperless • It’s not about note taking • Have a positive discussion • Engender trust in the organization • Non-punitive, non-blame, no names, no titles

  5. The Walkaround Process (2) 2. Observe People at Work • Make good quality observations of unsafe acts and unsafe conditions • Does the process look as safe as it could be? • Validate safe processes and safe conditions 3. Reach Judgments • Raise questions about the safety that you see • Does something you observe appear to be difficult to perform? • Does the posturing displayed appear to be awkward? • Raise questions that help people think about better ways to do things • Most unsafe conditions are a result of an unsafe act. • think about what unsafe acts could have led up to and resulted in an unsafe condition.

  6. The Walkaround Process (3) 4. Interact with Workers • Have a positive interface to share best thinking • The observer and worker engaging in active thinking about the work, the hazards connected with the work and ways to strengthen the work process • Recognition • Provide positive recognition with reinforcement for good safe behavior and practices

  7. The Walkaround Process (4) 5. Document what you have seen and done • Perform this immediately after your walkaround • Write down those things that will help you drive continuous improvement. • What are the unsafe acts and conditions you observed? • What are the underlying causes of those unsafe acts and conditions? • Determine the causes of unsafe acts and conditions, act to eliminate them so they won’t happen again. • Document any agreements that you reach with workers about improved work processes • Document any opportunities for improved standards or improved work processes • Document any follow-up actions you committed to • Ensure these steps drive continuous improvement

  8. The Walkaround Process (5) • How often do walkarounds need to be? • Weekly? • Monthly? • As Needed defined by Area/People

  9. Documenting & Follow Through • Enter corrective actions that cannot be immediately addressed into the LBNL Corrective Action Tracking System (CATS) • Make yourself the responsible person unless it is matrix space • Perform this in timely manner • Use this as a record to track follow-up (implementation) • A principal purpose of doing walkarounds is to identify opportunities for improvement and to implement those improvements • Bring documentation back to monthly safety meetings as data to drive continuous improvement in your operations

  10. Recognizing the reasons a negative situation occurs aids in addressing the problem. Understand Why Things Happen What happened here?

  11. What Do You Think?

  12. Are there any safety concerns here? Slips, Trips, Falls, and Bumps

  13. Most Common Ergo Posture (habit) Problems (p1) • Mouse arm • (extended arm) Better – mouse close to body Bad – arm under stress 2. Bent wrist & palm planting Better – raise keyboard, wrists neutral Bad – keyboard too low

  14. Most Common Ergo Posture (habit) Problems (p2) 3.Unsupported Arms Bad – arms in stress Better – arms supported 4. Bike riding Posture Frequently caused by eyesight issues – glasses OK? Bad - sitting out of the gate Better - relaxed

  15. Focus on asking the right question; Not on having the right answer “I know material handling is a challenge. What would you recommend to do this job better? How can I help?”

  16. Near-Miss/Precursor Relationships • Initial studies (1930s) showed that for each disabling injury, there were on average 29 minor injuries and 300 close calls/no injury. • Recent studies indicate that for each serious result there are on average 59 minor and 600 near-misses. INITIAL STUDIES EXAMPLE RECENT STUDIES SERIOUS Truck trailer moves, driver jumps to ground and breaks leg or truck rolls over him/her 1 1 MINOR Truck trailer moves, driver jumps to ground and sprains ankle 29 59 CLOSE CALL Lift truck is driven into truck trailer and trailer moves 300 600 3,000 6,000 PRECURSOR Wheel chocks not in place at rear wheels of trailer (courtesy of U.S. Army Safety Center & I.E. DuPont)

  17. Walkarounds • Need to be positive • Collaborative • Non-punitive • A teamwork process • Aimed at getting everyone’s best thinking • Energy directed making the operations as safe as possible. • Helps instill Safety as a core value If it isn’t safe, it isn’t done

More Related