1 / 51

FFY2014 EAP Annual Training

FFY2014 EAP Annual Training Part 8: Quality & Performance Controls; State Monitoring & Auditing; Grant Contract. Intro. to Monitoring & Auditing. Monitoring, Auditing & Oversight. One comprehensive system- its all about the money HHS monitoring OLA Auditing DOC EAP Auditing SP PARs

risa
Download Presentation

FFY2014 EAP Annual Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FFY2014 EAP Annual Training Part 8: Quality & Performance Controls; State Monitoring & Auditing; Grant Contract

  2. Intro. to Monitoring & Auditing

  3. Monitoring, Auditing & Oversight One comprehensive system- its all about the money • HHS monitoring • OLA Auditing DOC • EAP Auditing SP • PARs • On-site visits • Desk monitoring

  4. Monitoring, Auditing & Oversight National, State and Local efforts • Federal level • Increased funds staffing, monitoring, training, oversight • State level • Increased scrutiny, systems, controls, requirements • Local level • Self monitoring, risk assessment, oversight

  5. Monitoring, Auditing & Oversight All of us • Play a role • Are responsible • Need to get better at these activities

  6. Monitoring, Auditing & Oversight It’s about the money because . . . • Need to understand that is as important as providing the service to the household • If the program does not have integrity it can’t be here to help those who need it • It’s about the households

  7. Monitoring and Q&PC • Sandra Seemann

  8. Quality & Performance Control • Periodic review of program data helps ensure compliance with policies, timely service, program integrity • Some reports help mitigate risk (e.g. of inaccurate benefit) • Duplicate vendor accounts and addresses • Electric mismatch • ERR outliers • Other reports ensure quality, timely service • Aging applications • Aging Crisis payments • Aging PH payments • Unprocessed refunds

  9. Dup Vendor & Address Checks Checking for duplicate vendor accounts and addresses is a key risk mitigation activity • Program integrity and audit-ability • Address problems early before they become critical (i.e. catch duplicate vendor account before double payment goes to a HHD) • Dup checks aren’t busy work – we catch stuff • SPs must continue to be responsive to dup checks • OLA examines our records for dups

  10. Dup Vendor & Address Checks Provide good responses to dup checks • Give enough info so it’s known what happened & that correct benefit was determined or necessary corrections made • Examples:

  11. Electric Mismatch • This shows mismatches between the info in eHEAT and consumption for the HHD • SPs can and should run this themselves (in eHEAT Advanced Search) • DOC also runs these

  12. ERR Outliers • ERR is the largest benefit and thus biggest risk • Outside of central payment process • Checking for ERR outliers helps find ERR projects that may be outside program rules

  13. Aging Apps, Crisis & PH Payments • Important to ensure timely service to HHDs • SPs can and should check for aging apps and payments on a regular basis • DOC also runs these to notify SP when they have aging apps or payments they may have overlooked

  14. State Monitoring

  15. State Monitoring Training Topics • Types of on-site monitoring • De-mystifying file review • Purpose of findings & recommendations • Questions

  16. State Monitoring Intentions • Conduct oversight to reduce risks to the program, service providers and households • Evaluate SP’s competency for delivering EAP • Ensure program integrity

  17. State Monitoring On-site visits • DOC conducts two types of on-site visits • Initial Program Assessment Visit (iPAV) • Full Program Audit Visit (fPAV)

  18. State Monitoring Initial Program Assessment Visit (iPAV) Focus • Review findings and recommendations from previous year(s) • Review Local Plan – discuss DOC questions and SP changes • Ensure SP has necessary resources and is ready for FFY14 • File review • Provide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA) Prior to visit • Send T&TA requests to your Program Performance Auditor • Do not save questions for the visit, send immediately to your PPA or eap.mail

  19. State Monitoring Full Program Audit Visit (fPAV) Focus • In-depth review of SP’s program implementation • Review of Primary Heat, Crisis and ERR files • Review payroll records • Inventory • Additional documents as requested Prior to visit • Full Program Audit Tool (fPAT) • Send T&TA requests to your Program Performance Auditor • Do not save questions for the visit, send immediately to your PPA or eap.mail

  20. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • PH – 30 files, plus: • 5 Self employment • 5 No income • 5 Denied • All consumption >$5,000 • Crisis – 30 files • ERR – 5 files, plus • All tasks >$5,000

  21. State Monitoring File Sample Review – Why so many files? • Statistical significance • Each SP has a “population” of files • We can’t review all of them • By reviewing a random sample of the whole population, we can get a relatively good representation of the whole • Even 30 files out of 1000+ is not entirely representative

  22. State Monitoring File Sample Review – Why so many files? • Enables DOC to more accurately know the true nature of any identified issue • For example: • We review 5 files, and 2 have an issue (40%) • Do 40% of all the SP’s files have the same issue? We can’t say… • We review 30 files, and 2 have an issue (~7%) • In this case, we can be more certain that it’s not a systemic issue • We review 30 files, but 12 have an issue (40%) • In this case, we would be more certain that SPs files may actually have an systemic issue

  23. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • PH – Application Processing • Applications are dated and signed by applicant • Applications are date stamped and logged the day they arrive • Income statements for all HH members are complete & well documented • Accurate income calculation of the EAP household • Complete documentation verification case notes (Who, When, What) in paper file or in eHEAT • Copies of any correspondence with the applicant, if applicable • Documentation of research done in response to a question, complaint, or appeal, if applicable • Delivery of timely program services • Maintain proper EAP data security practices

  24. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • PH – Eligibility Determination • Household member info • Household income documentation & calculation • Housing type and status (e.g., subsidized, heat in rent) • PH – Benefit Amount Determination • All of the above, plus: • Fuel type • Home heating system status (e.g., dual fuel) • Consumption

  25. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • Crisis – Eligibility Determination • HH’s past due bills in file or documentation of emergency • Documentation of energy vendor verification • Available PH payments did not resolve the emergency. Check if PH payments were made payable after Crisis benefit determined • SP - HH correspondence notes in file or eHEAT • Check that eHEAT Crisis reason matches documented rationale • Are SPs doing reasonability checks for delivered fuel?

  26. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • Crisis – SP Response • For HH in a life-threatening situation the LIHEAP law requires that the threat to life be removed within 18 hours of a household requesting crisis • No heat in the house • No heat distribution • For HHs experiencing immediate energy emergencies that are not life threatening SPs must approve crisis services within 48 hours • Compare crisis reported date to completion/approval/ payment date

  27. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • Crisis – Benefit Amount Determination • Compare the crisis amount with the vendor verification documentation and PH benefit amount • Is the SP properly using the Crisis amount and fees boxes in eHEAT?

  28. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • ERR – Eligibility • Documentation of proof of ownership (if required) must be in paper file or eHEAT. • Documentation of a qualified dwelling. • Documentation of valid request for repair or replacement, including description of the problem. • Documentation of eligible heating system (e.g., not redundant). • Determine if ERR-related application information matches eHEAT information. • Verify that changes to application are documented.

  29. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • ERR – SP Response • For HH in a life-threatening situation the LIHEAP law requires that the threat to life be removed within 18 hours of a household requesting crisis • No heat in the house • No heat distribution • For HHs experiencing immediate energy emergencies that are not life threatening SPs must approve crisis services within 48 hrs • Compare ERR reported date to completion/approval/payment date • Documentation that temporary heat was provided appropriately, if applicable

  30. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • ERR – Benefit Amount Determination • Documentation of the contractor's determination of need for response to the ERR request (i.e., need for repair or replacement) • Documentation of "Manual J" calculations

  31. State Monitoring File Sample Review – What do we look for? • ERR – Other • Inspection Certificate • 50% of completed furnace replacements & retrofits inspected • Must be inspected prior to contractor payment • Completion Certificate • Required for all repairs & replacements > $1,000 • Signed and dated by homeowner & contractor • Must include model and serial numbers • If inspected, inspector signature • Itemized Invoices

  32. State Monitoring Findings & Recommendations • Meant to point out areas that should or must be improved • By identifying areas for improvement, we can take meaningful action • We want to ensure that we: • Deliver the highest quality of service to their communities • Comply with applicable laws • Not meant as punishment or to reprimand • Use the audit as a tool to improve services to HHs

  33. State Monitoring Questions During the Program Year • DOC EAP staff are here to help you • Call or email your Program Performance Auditor • Can also email your questions to eap.mail • Emails with private household data must be sent via secure email • Check with your IT staff about how to do this

  34. EAP Grant Contract & Allocation of EAP Funds

  35. EAP Grant Contract & Allocation Training Topics • EAP Contract • FFY 14 changes • Contract checklist • Contract timelines • Allocation of EAP funds • EAP Fund Line Items • EAP Fund Allocation Determination • Service Providers Obligation Authority

  36. EAP Grant Contract Intention: • Authorize grantees to provide program services • To ensure program changes to policy, law or other guidance are complied with by Service Providers By: • Meeting the requirements of state and federal program and contracting laws • Clearly detailing requirements for service providers delivering programs • Clearly detailing program service outcomes

  37. EAP Grant Contract Contract address three general areas • Grant administration • Fiscal management • Performance requirements

  38. EAP Grant Contract FFY14 Contract Change Termination of contract by the Grantee (Page 6-20.3): • Current: The Grantee may terminate this grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty days written notice to the State. • FFY14:The Grantee may terminate this grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixtydays written notice to the State. • Current:The Grantee must submit a final invoice to the State no later than thirtydays after termination. • FFY14: The Grantee must submit a final invoice to the State no later thansixtydays after termination.

  39. EAP Grant Contract Grant Contract Timeline • August 9, 2013, DOC sent FFY14 Contract to SPs for signatures • September 9, 2013 signed Contract submissions due by 4:00 pm. • By October 1, 2013 DOC executes and distributes contract documents with Local Plan

  40. Grant Contract Checklist • State of Minnesota Encumbrance Worksheet • FFY14 EAP Grant Contract • Affirmative Action Certificate • Certification Regarding Lobbying, Debarment … • Current Certificate of Compliance from MN DHS. • Conflict of Interest Policy Statement Exempts: County agencies, Reservations and Service Providers with less than 40 employees • FFY2014 Local Plan (Separately) • Supplements • eHEAT Admin Security Agreement

  41. EAP Grant Contract Grant Contract Submission • Make sure signatoriesare available to sign the contract • Return the two contracts with: • Original signatures of the Chair of the Board of Directors or the authorized signatory. • Signature authority from Board of Directors must accompany the grant contract only if person signing the grant contract is not the Chair of the Board of Directors. • Signature of Certifications for Affirmative Action & Lobbying

  42. Allocation of EAP Funds EAP Funds Allocation • Budgeting and allocation of EAP funds are among the key components of EAP fiscal management along EAP Fund Line items: Activities include: • Managing budget • Requesting funds • Spending funds in compliance with EAP

  43. Allocation of EAP Funds State level EAP Fund management activities • Maintain EAP budget for local allocations • Identify total amount of funds available for local allocations • Establish budget by LIHEAP line items • Establish budget to Service Providers (EAP Line items) • Enter budget limits into eHEAT • Monitor Budget • Update Budget as needed • Maintain eHEAT • Allocate obligational authority to local agencies

  44. EAP Fund Line items • Administrative funds: Pay the cost of delivering the local EAP including staff salaries and associated allowable costs • A16 funds: Pay the cost of EAP outreach, referral and advocacy services. EAP Policy Manual describes allowable A16 activities • Primary Heat funds: Pay portion (%) of energy costs for eligible EAP households in residential dwellings • Emergency funds: Pay in addition to Primary Heat funds, for Crisis eligible households experiencing an energy emergency • ERR funds: Address mechanical heating system problems for eligible homeowners.

  45. Allocation of EAP Funds Funds distributed by DOC but approved by SPs • Primary Heat Funds (eHEAT) • Crisis Funds (eHEAT) Funds administered by Service Providers • Administrative Funds • A16 Funds • ERR Funds

  46. Allocation of EAP Funds Service Providers Obligation Authority • Know the amounts of their EAP fund allocations. • Request cash, as needed (the three-day-cash-on-hand rule applies). • Spend in compliance with LIHEAP policies &procedures • Report their expenditures.

  47. Allocation of EAP Funds Factors affecting allocation of EAP funds • Total amount of Federal fund allocated for the year • State level allocation percentage for each EAP fund line items (Based on LIHEAP Statue) • Service Provider’s number of processed applications from previous years • Service Provider’s amount of expenditures from previous years

  48. EAP Fund Allocation Determination: Allocations for each EAP funding line items are established using a predetermined process: 1. Allocation MN State LIHEAP fund by each EAP category * The EAPWX* is 5% when admin funds are included

  49. EAP Fund Allocation Determination (Cont..) 2. EAP Production: Line items with allocations determined by Previous years’ number of processed EAP applications, Crisis and ERR: • Administrative Funds • A16 Funds 3. EAP Expenditure: Line items with allocations determined current years’ EAP expenditure rate: • Emergency Funds • ERR Funds

  50. Admin and A16 Allocation formula Uses the two previous years average of : • # of Approved Apps • # of Crisis Approved • # of ERR Approved • # of Others Apps including: • Total Denied • Insufficient Information • Invalid SSN • Over Income • Subsidized / Heat & Electric Included In Rent

More Related