1 / 19

2008-09 Perkins Federal Report

2008-09 Perkins Federal Report. Secondary Core Indicator Results Statewide Results Local Performance Improvement/Sanctions Changes/Future. 2008-09 Statewide Results Indiana exceeded the AUL on all but one of eight indicators. Local Performance. 1S1-Language Arts. 1S1-Math.

rmattison
Download Presentation

2008-09 Perkins Federal Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2008-09 Perkins Federal Report Secondary Core Indicator Results • Statewide Results • Local Performance • Improvement/Sanctions • Changes/Future

  2. 2008-09 Statewide ResultsIndiana exceeded the AUL on all but one of eight indicators

  3. Local Performance

  4. 1S1-Language Arts

  5. 1S1-Math

  6. 2S1-Technical Attainment

  7. 3S1-Completion

  8. 4S1-Graduation

  9. 5S1-Placement

  10. 6S1-Nontrad Part

  11. 6S2-Nontrad Completion

  12. High Performing Locals There were two districts that met or exceeded on all eight of the indicators... • AVD#18-Area 18 Career & Technical Education • AVD#29-Parke-Vermillion Education/Training Interlocal

  13. High Performing Locals • Only one district has met or exceeded on all indicators for the past three years. That district is: AVD#18 Area 18 Career & Technical Education

  14. Local Performance • 14 AVDs met or exceeded on at least 7/8 indicators. • 33 of the AVDs met or exceeded on at least 6/8 indicators But • Ten of the AVDs only met or exceeded on three or less indicators.

  15. Steps to Improvement/Sanctions Improvement Plan Year 1 If the local fails the first year on an indicator, the State will notify them that an improvement plan must be implemented. At this point, the approved annual plan may be revised and funds redirected to affected core indicators. State staff will monitor implementation of the Annual Plan and provide technical assistance as requested.

  16. Steps to Improvement/Sanctions Improvement Plan Year 2 State staff will review performance results from Improvement Plan Year 1 to determine the level of improvement. If performance has not improved to meet or exceed the local AUL, staff may prescribe the use of local funds to address deficient core indicators.

  17. Steps to Improvement/Sanctions Improvement Plan Year 3 State staff will continue to provide technical assistance and monitor the recipient for improvements. If results from Program Year 3 do not show enough positive improvement, State staff may recommend that some or all of the basic grant allocation be redirected to an alternate provider with the capacity and expertise to provide services to the failing institution’s CTE students.

  18. Changes/Future • NOCTI lists-by Friday? • Mailing out by Friday • New Spring Required Fields-DOB, Earned Credit?, STN checks for validity and accuracy, SSN or address * * FALL 2010 - Form 30A

  19. Thank you for all of your efforts!

More Related