1 / 37

Final Report

Final Report. Viren Bhanot. Work Done. Rotary compressor – Its working and calculations Small Experiment Line Bypass Heater C alibration Heat Balance Report Accumulator Dry-Out testing Accumulator Cooling Power measurements CMS Pixel Upgrade User’s Manual for Building 158.

roana
Download Presentation

Final Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Final Report Viren Bhanot

  2. Work Done • Rotary compressor – Its working and calculations • Small Experiment Line • Bypass Heater Calibration • Heat Balance Report • Accumulator Dry-Out testing • Accumulator Cooling Power measurements • CMS Pixel Upgrade • User’s Manual for Building 158

  3. Rotary Compressor Sanyo Compressor • Model no.: C-C140L5 • Dedicated for CO2 • Two-Stage compression • Pressure rating of 90 bar (outlet, 2nd stage)

  4. Matlab Compressor Calculations

  5. Small Experiment Line • 250W Cartridge Heater • Swagelok Fittings • Concentric Heat Exchanger after Mass Flow Meter • Actuators for Metering Valves

  6. Heater Selection • 250 W heater required • Cartridge, insertion heater for direct heating • Inlet to heater perpendicular to its length • Flow development analysed for selection • Hydrodynamic and Thermodynamic flow development • Low watt density required

  7. Heater Selection Correlations Used: • Hausen • Stephan • Shah/London • Flow Development • Fully Developed • Thermodynamically developing, Hydrodynamically developed • Simultaneously developing

  8. Heater Selection Specifications: • WatlowFirerod Cartridge Heater • Ф-3/8”, Length – 7” • Power - 250 W • Watt Density – 5 W/cm2 • 4” No-heat zone • Epoxy Seals to protect from moisture

  9. Swagelok Fittings • Heater mounted on reducer union • Inlet through Welding Tee fitting • Tube inner dia = 1/2”, heater dia = 3/8” • Line between mass flow meter and metering valve in a concentric internal heat exchanger. • Whole Assembly Welded Together

  10. CAD Model

  11. Heater Assembly

  12. Actuator • Electrical Actuator for Swagelok metering valves Two companies discovered: • Hanbayinc. (Canada) • Grotec (Germany) • Actuator ordered from Hanbay (cost ~ $1500)

  13. Bypass Heater Calibration • Bypass Heater (2 kW) performance not satisfactory • Virtually no heating at low powers, then sudden overheating at medium-high powers • Output power not equal to power requested through PVSS • Heater controlled through phase angle controller (inexpensive way of controlling heater) • “Span” setting of heater too narrow. Corrected.

  14. Bypass Heater Calibration • Tests performed to measure heater power and compare it against input power (through PVSS) • System run in single phase to measure enthalpy using Pressure and Temperature. • Power o/p = Enthalpy Change x Massflow Rate • Pressure, temperature measured across internal heat exchanger. • Output power found to be not equal to input power

  15. Bypass Heater Calibration

  16. Bypass Heater Calibration • Phase Angle Controller chops up the sine-wave signal (4-20 mA) linear with time, instead of linear with output power • Mustapha prepared MATLAB and PVSS programs to correctly calculate output power to match input power. • New logic incorporated into PVSS by Lukasz. Works perfectly, and has been tested.

  17. Heat Balance • Heater Calibration tests expanded to give overview of heat balance for entire system. • Heat addition/extraction measured to get an idea of system performance • Compressor data also included Parameters measured • Preq • Qpump • Qheater • Qin • Qcond • Qcomp

  18. Heat Balance

  19. Heat Balance

  20. Heat Balance Conclusions drawn: • Up until 1100W, the readings are reliable. • Readings above 1100W are unreliable due to premature boiling of CO2 inside the tubes. • Offset between requested power and power measured is due to heat added by the pump and surroundings. • Compressor cooling capacity is lower than expected (this data is already 2 months old)

  21. Accumulator Dry-Out Testing • Accumulator heater in thermo-syphon configuration • During start-up, accumulator heated for long time • At higher vapor pressure, higher vapor density. • At higher density, lower convective currents • Risk of dry-out, heater melting.

  22. Accumulator Dry-Out Testing • A parameter called Thermal Resistance used to calculate dry-out thresholds • Accumulator heated for long periods with 250, 500, 750, 900 and 1000W power • Rthcalculated for all data points, and plotted against accumulator saturation temperature. • Combined graph for all readings plotted

  23. Accumulator Dry-Out Testing

  24. Accumulator Dry-Out Testing Conclusions drawn: • At 250W Heater Power, dry-out is not witnessed. • Higher the heater power, lower the saturation temperature at which dry-out occurs. • Some unexplained bumps are observed at higher powers, through sudden, steep rises and falls in the values of Thermal Resistance

  25. Accumulator Cooling Power • Tests done to measure cooling power in accumulator • It was expected that cooling at 100% valve opening should match heating at 100% heater power (1 kW) • This was not the case • Some cooling power lost because cooling spiral passes through liquid CO2.

  26. Accumulator Cooling Power • Accumulator cooled and then heated at specific rates. For example, 50% CV1105 valve opening corresponds to 50% heater power, 500W • Slopes of cooling and heating measured. • Cooling slope observed to be less than heating slope. • Since slope unequal, this method not enough to determine cooling power

  27. Accumulator Cooling Power

  28. Accumulator Cooling Power • Rough estimate obtained by plotting Heater’s power versus the value ‘dp/dt’ (change in pressure per unit time) • dp/dt values of cooling spiral superimposed on heating graph. • This gives rough but useful estimate of cooling capacity.

  29. Accumulator Cooling Power Cooling Power Measured:

  30. Accumulator Cooling Power Conclusions: • Cooling power does not correspond to its respective heating power. • The maximum cooling power available is only 740W. • The cooling power at 25% valve opening is not a quarter of the full cooling power. This is due to the inertia of the fluid. • Cooling Power is not completely linear over the entire range.

  31. CMS Pixel Upgrade • CMS Pixel layout being discussed with various iterations proposed. • Latest proposal (at that time) was simulated to measure the fluid temperature and pressure drop. Results were compared with Bart’s results (with his global calculator) • Joao’s calculator was used in Matlab, and simulations with Friedel and Chisholm correlations. • The simulation results were similar to, but not exactly the same as Bart’s own simulations.

  32. CMS Pixel Upgrade

  33. CMS Pixel Upgrade

  34. User’s Manual • The eventual aim of project was to prepare User Manual to allow external researchers (Belle, SLAC, IBL) to use the system without distracting Bart, Lukasz or Joao! • The manual is about 60 pages long and will hopefully be used by someone in the future.

  35. Thank You

More Related