1 / 19

U of Alberta

Enhancing doctoral education: A collaborative endeavour? Lynn McAlpine, Oxford University Cheryl Amundsen, Simon Fraser University (As you get settled) Please respond to Part A of the handout and discuss with the person next to you. U of Alberta. A global focus. Doing a doctorate …. ?.

Download Presentation

U of Alberta

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhancing doctoral education: A collaborative endeavour? Lynn McAlpine, Oxford University Cheryl Amundsen, Simon Fraser University (As you get settled) Please respond to Part A of the handout and discuss with the person next to you. U of Alberta

  2. A global focus

  3. Doing a doctorate …. ?

  4. Why do a doctorate? I wanted to pursue personal intellectual interests. I wanted to increase my knowledge in my field of study. I needed a doctorate to enter into or advance in my field. A faculty member recommended I pursue a doctorate. *All options chosen: top to bottom most common whether full or part-time

  5. The personal …

  6. Doctoral activities

  7. Doctoral-academic work … practice

  8. Reading/ knowing the literature What students reported Other Reflection Writing

  9. Relationships: Who do students interact with ? Who is most important?

  10. Interactions: Day-to-day and most important

  11. Another view of relationships (Mack & Passet, 1993)

  12. What do students expect of supervisors?

  13. What do students expect of supervisors? • Expertise, experience, most informed about ‘my work’ • Concrete constructive timely feedback on work (writing, design, data collection, analysis) • Feedback on overall progress • Available (meeting at least once a month) • Ethical advice (co-authorship, referreeing fairly, appropriate use of research funds) • Dealing with bureaucratic tangles and regulations ** Shifts in frequency and nature of need over time ** Rarely mentioned: career planning, reading

  14. Other challenges: Why some students take longer

  15. Supervisory relationship • Absence • Lack of intellectual investment • Conflict Other challenges: Why some students take longer • Concurrent chronic family/ personal issues • When students seek help • Lack of information (including who to see) about issue • Lack of consistent response

  16. Moving forward: an agenda

  17. Moving forward: an agenda What is working What is missing

  18. Moving forward: an agenda Our ideas: Policies Our ideas: Practices • Critical review – scanning the landscape, e.g., U of A report • Codes of practice for supervision, e.g., Oxford • Exit survey of all doctoral students who leave including those not graduating, e.g., SFU • Institutional regular reporting structures (students and supervisors), e.g., Oxford electronic report • Review institutional resources: • Oxford, Career Services academic mentoring program • McGill, Counselling Service self help group • Ensure visibility of resources: • SFU, Faculty of Education Handbook for Students and Supervisors • McGill, Faculty of Education ‘ABCs of the PhD’ workshops • Oxford, research supervision website

  19. Contacting us lynn.mcalpine@learning.ox.ac.uk lynn.mcalpine@mcgill.ca camundsa@sfu.ca

More Related