1 / 29

Development Ethics and USAID

Management Systems International 600 Water Street, NW, Washington, DC 20024. Development Ethics and USAID. “Tuesday Group”, May 17, 2005. David A. Crocker & Chloe Schwenke. PRESENTATION SUMMARY. Part One ~ Development Ethics: Origins, Agreements, Controversies, Agenda

rod
Download Presentation

Development Ethics and USAID

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Management Systems International600 Water Street, NW, Washington, DC 20024 Development Ethics and USAID “Tuesday Group”, May 17, 2005 David A. Crocker & Chloe Schwenke

  2. PRESENTATION SUMMARY • Part One ~ Development Ethics: Origins, Agreements, Controversies, Agenda • Part Two ~ Development Ethics and USAID • Democracy and Governance Assessment

  3. Part OneDevelopment Ethics: Origins, Agreements, Controversies, Agenda

  4. WHAT IS DEVELOPMENT ETHICS? • “Development ethicists morally reflect upon and assess the ends and means of local, national, regional, and global development.” • Colorado State University, 1978 - A course in development ethics?

  5. SOURCES OF DEVELOPMENT ETHICS • Development Practice • Development Theory and Criticism • 40’s-50’s: Gandhi, Prebisch, Fanon • 60’s-70’s: Goulet and Berger • “Lifeboat Ethic” Debate: Singer vs. Hardin • 80’s → Analytic philosophers • 80’s → Streeten and Sen • Associations, Consultants, and Initiatives: IDEA, IDB, HDCA, “Friday Morning Group,” NORAD • Anthologies and textbooks

  6. AREAS OF CONSENSUS ~ QUESTIONS • What moral or value issues emerge in practice and how might they be resolved? • Examples from USAID experience? • What is (good) development? • “Development” or “______”? • Development as rationalization of other goals? • National economic or political interests?

  7. AREAS OF CONSENSUS ~ MORE QUESTIONS • What are best ends and values? • How should benefits and harms be conceived? • How should benefits, harms, and burdens be distributed? • Virtues/vices of development agents?

  8. AREAS OF CONSENSUS ~ STILL MORE QUESTIONS • Duty to promote development? • Who has them? • What are they? • On what are they based? • Role of professional codes? • Practical impediments to development? • Theoretical obstacles to development ethics? • Who should decide these questions and how?

  9. AREAS OF CONSENSUS ~ ANSWERS • Deprivations and prosperity co-exist, and the former are unnecessary, remediable, and often due to the latter • Development has ethical dimensions and can benefit from ethics • Put moral questions and answers on center stage • Explicit reflection and deliberation on “Doing the right thing” • Development as interdisciplinary theory and integrated theory-practice • Development as social change that reduces deprivation and misery and increases human well-being and freedom

  10. AREAS OF CONSESNUS ~ MORE ANSWERS • Development (good ends) is more than economic growth (a means) • Development ethics on different levels of generality and specificity • Global in triple sense • Contextual sensitivity • Rejection of extremes • Discrimination • “Unaimed opulence” • Authoritarian egalitarianism

  11. CONTROVERSIES Scope of development ethics • North and South? • Beyond ODA? Status of norms: universal or relative to culture? “Thickness” of norms • Thegood life or minimal decency? • Self-determination plus tolerance or specific content? • Threshold plus choice?

  12. MORE CONTROVERSIES • Content of norms • Which moral notions? Ethics as lenses for looking: • Income/GNP? • Preference satisfaction • Agency/capability/functioning • Rights • Virtues • Which distributive principles, and what distributions are most just? • Human and nonhuman communities?

  13. STILL MORE CONTROVERSIES • Responsibilities for change? • Local, national, or global • Who decides? • Experts vs. popular agency • Outsiders vs. insiders • Blame for failures? • Local, national, or global order • Navigating against a headwind

  14. AGENDA • 1) Put ethics in the center of development • 2) Promote ethical capabilities in leaders, change agents, citizens • 3) Overcome gap between theory and practice, ethics and action

  15. Part TwoDevelopment Ethics and USAID

  16. HOW TO USE DEVELOPMENT ETHICS IN DG • Toolkit or Checklist? • A way of thinking, seeing, understanding? • Conceptualizing “development” • Differentiating between DG means and ends • Identifying rights-holders and duty-bearers • Voice ~ empowering stakeholders

  17. WHAT TOOLS? • Applied Ethics • Normative analysis, ethically-sensitive program design, and assessment informed by moral theory, moral intuition, and moral discernment. • Moral theories commonly applied in development ethics include, but are not limited to: • Utilitarianism • The capability approach • Human rights approaches • Kantian approaches • Virtue ethics • Feminist ethics

  18. BUT WHY BE ETHICAL? • Drivers of international development and foreign assistance • National self-interest • National security • National prosperity and well-being • National prestige • Altruism • Compassion and care • Reciprocity, mutuality

  19. CONSIDERING DEMOCRACY • A system of open competition between candidates, interests, power factions, ideas? • What happens between elections? • “Good” governance? Accountability? Transparency? • The common good? • What happens to the “losers”? • A means to structure the application of power to achieve a working consensus? • Consensus through deliberation instead of competition? • in competitive processes to identify the common good, who always loses ?

  20. DEMOCRACY’S GOALS • Avoiding the “fragile state” ~ democracy as a means to preserve stability and the status quo? • Stability at what price, and at whose costs? • Short term stability = protecting the status quo • Equitable development, alleviation of poverty, social and economic mobility = creating long term stability • A mechanism (checks and balances) to constrain and direct – in a positive way – human greed and ambition? • Is there room for different motives: integrity, civic virtue, moral principals, concern for the welfare of others? • Where does inclusive “deliberative democracy” fit in to the mechanism?

  21. IS THERE A ROLE FOR IDEALS IN DG (outside the USA)?

  22. LENSES OF DG ANALYSIS AND DESIGN • Political science lens • “Who stands on the other side of democratic reform…” • The donor’s interests are important, indeed may be dispositive…” • Economics lens • “Competition is imbedded in the very structure of democratic governance.” • Sociological lens • “Is there a social compact that allows ordered disagreement about policies to take place?” • Moral lens • “Any analysis of the rule of law must begin with a review of the country’s human rights record…”

  23. APPLYING THE MORAL LENS • The problem ofcorruption • Identifying and constraining bad behavior • Gift, petty corruption, tradition? • Sanctions • Institutional safeguards • Accountability and transparency • Codes of ethics, codes of conduct • Encouraging good behavior • Rejecting the notion that corruption is inevitable • Fostering integrity • Strengthening moral leadership • Teaching moral education (“civics”) • Codes of ethics, codes of conduct as dynamic tools

  24. DGA FRAMEWORK ~ STAGE ONE • Characteristics of the political system • Consider full rights of public participation • Often constrained or frustrated by poverty, public apathy, elite’s tendency to limit participation • Right to participation linked to civic duty to participate • Participation can be a destabilizing threat to elite interests • Participation – an exercise of freedom: citizen voice and agency • Consider if barriers to participation exist • But what is the nature of those barriers? • Who is responsible for the barriers? For removing them?

  25. DGA FRAMEWORK ~ STAGE ONE • Good Governance • “Democracy is a form of governance, not a philosophy club.” • “Deliver the goods.” • Who defines the “good”? • Are the goods really good? • How much good is enough (for those who really need it)? • How fairly is the good distributed? • “A few authoritarian regimes have also delivered good governance…”

  26. DGA FRAMEWORK ~ STAGES TWO AND THREE • Key Actors: Individuals and Institutions • Players in the game of politics • Any political environment (game) operates under particular rules • How just is the balance of power established by the rules? • How fair are the rules that inform social choice? • What opportunities are offered to the losers of the game? • Do ideals shape the rules? • Does integrity matter in how the rules are conceived, reformed, applied? • Do the rules reflect the values of the stakeholders?

  27. DGA FRAMEWORK ~ STAGE FOUR • Implementation ~ distilling the optimal strategy • “The primary problems are clear. The allies, opponents, and resources have been identified, as has the playing field and its rules.” • Who has defined the problems? (Whose problems take priority? Why? Do short term or long term results take precedence?) • Is the field “sloped”? • Who makes the compromises, and on what basis (need, power, donor status, other “strategic interests”)? • “The hope is that this framework can help those who are committed to enlarging freedom and democracy find a coherent way to do so.”

  28. CONCLUSIONS • USAID’s model of democracy and good governance is ethically incomplete • The “right of rights”: citizen deliberation and agency • A need to make broad-based public participation effective and sustainable • Governance as stewardship, advocacy, and problem solving, not just delivering the goods • Allowing space for desire for integrity, care for others, and the power of ideals as motivating factors driving citizens to do good

  29. RECOMMENDATIONS • Incorporate a moral lens in the DGA Framework • Two-stage workshop at USAID on development ethics • “Friday Morning Group” equivalent • Credit course or extended training for USAID staff on development ethics

More Related