1 / 13

LIFE IN PRISON

LIFE IN PRISON. Female Inmates’ Adaptation and/or Subscription to Inmate Code (prisionization). PRISIONIZATION: “the taking on, in greater or lesser degree, of the folkways, mores, customs and general culture of the penitentiary.” – Donald Clemmer. The Invisible Criminal.

Download Presentation

LIFE IN PRISON

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LIFE IN PRISON Female Inmates’ Adaptation and/or Subscription to Inmate Code (prisionization)

  2. PRISIONIZATION: “the taking on, in greater or lesser degree, of the folkways, mores, customs and general culture of the penitentiary.” – Donald Clemmer

  3. The Invisible Criminal • Historical implications • Gender was secondary • Imprisonment followed male guidelines • Different type of care than male convicts • Imprisoned and then forgotten • No programs • No medical attention • No supervision • Few opportunities to work • Today there is more parity in policy but is there equality?

  4. PRISON CULTURE • Subjugation • Institutionally paternalistic • Systematically repressive/arbitrary • Symbolizes oppressive authority • Intensifies powerlessness • Strips away identity • Dysfunctional environment

  5. PAINS OF IMPRISONMENT • Separation from family • Freedom of choice and activity limited • Apprehension • Stigma • Lack of experience Ward & Kassebaum, 1964

  6. FOUR RESPONSES TO PAINS OF IMPRISIONMENT • DEATH • INSTITUTIONALIZATION • SELF-MUTILATION • MADNESS

  7. INSTITUTION EFFECTS • Below quality of men’s prisons • Provide fewer programs/reinforce traditional roles • Less access to lawyers & outside contacts • Unspecialized prison • More severe impact • Experience two emotions • Surprise • Fear • Look to staff • Information • Material goods

  8. INSTITUTION EFFECTS (cont) • Inmate Code • Not as salient for females as for male prisoners • Reaction to deprivation • Identity as women • Internalization of delinquent subcultures • Importation vs. deprivation: direct effect on subscription to code • Importation: criminal history and personal characteristics • Deprivation: situational or prison-specific variables • Low subscription • End of term ??? • 1st arrest after age 25 • High subscription • Middle of sentence ??? • Younger and urban inmates • Prior imprisonments • More serious convictions (verbally) • Married • Short-timers/early phase • End of term???

  9. INSTITUTION EFFECTS (cont) • Also… • Low subscription indicated by little role playing • Merchants • Politicians • Gorilla • Reflects male needs for status, independence, and masculine self-image • Less predatory inmate population • More like medium security men’s prison • Less tense • Less violent • Subculture: Men vs Women • Men’s exist to protect from each other • Neutralize rejection • Emotional support

  10. Gender • Women experience incarceration differently • Likely to be rule-breakers • Gender-based frameworks • Less social capital • Subverts mother-child bond • Do not maintain group solidarity • Informing on others characteristic • Not relevant for women • Roles differentiated along sexual lines • Emotional/ manipulative coping strategies • Dramatically different from men’s • Perpetuate gender stereotypes inside • Engage in self-aggression • Suicide • Self-mutilation • Seen as less respectful to authority • Willing to argue • Written up twice as much as men • For less serious infraction

  11. OTHER OBSERVATIONS • Jenson and Jones • Examines prisonization during 1970s • Studies career phase • No issue of overcrowing addressed • Did not consider “other” impact of “public institutions” • Social services experiences • Foster care • Welfare recipients • Continue to use male oriented questions • Women’s need’s not considered

  12. McCorkel’s article suggests • View of women prisoners have changed • Redefining of dependency • Marriage of welfare and criminal justice policies- maybe more to come • Reform efforts replaced with punishment • Different internal and external pressure for change • Solution to overcrowding • Replace penal paternalism • Made prisonlike • Treat women like men – masculine • More punitive

  13. CONCLUSION Inmates tend to undergo some degree of prisonization irrespective of race, education, urban-nonurban status, prior prison experience, legal status and offense. (Jensen & Jones, 1976) However, the deceptive nature of women’s prisons… while subtle, is stronger than in men’s institutions. (Chapter 1, p.20)

More Related