1 / 34

Does well-being predict resilience in adolescents?

Does well-being predict resilience in adolescents?. Paul Jose Victoria Univ. of Wellington New Zealand Association of Positive Psychology conference Auckland, New Zealand 8 June, 2013. Usual question: does resilience predict wellbeing?.

ronna
Download Presentation

Does well-being predict resilience in adolescents?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Does well-being predict resilience in adolescents? Paul Jose Victoria Univ. of Wellington New Zealand Association of Positive Psychology conference Auckland, New Zealand 8 June, 2013

  2. Usual question: does resilience predict wellbeing? • Resilience is considered to be a characteristic/process that enables individuals to weather difficult times. Should be predictive of positive outcomes, or at least ‘less negative outcomes’. Considerable evidence of this relationship. • I am turning the equation around and asking the ‘broaden-and-build’ question: does wellbeing lead to greater resilience?

  3. Risk and Resilience • In psychiatric theory and research, there is a long-standing interest in identifying risk factors in development • Risk factors are influences that heighten the odds of greater maladaptation, i.e., an alcoholic parent is predictive of poorer outcomes in children • Similarly, research has tried to identify factors that protect against maladaptation • Resilience factors lessen the odds of greater maladaptation, i.e., social resources like intact families as well as internal characteristics such as a sense of humour

  4. Person-centred to process-oriented • Initial formulations of resilience located the “good stuff” in the person, i.e., “the invulnerable child” • But following Bronfenbrenner’s emphasis on the interactions between person and their multiple contexts, resilience research has evolved to become more process-oriented • Today, we believe that resilient children and adolescents possess certain qualities that allow them to interact with their contexts well

  5. Typical definition • Resilience is imputed when one sees: • good outcomes regardless of high-risk status, • constant competence under stress, • recovery from trauma, and • using challenges for growth that makes future hardships more tolerable. • The emphasis, you will note, is on doing well in the face of hardship. • Growing consensus that resilient individuals are successful because of: • Adaptive coping strategies, • Successful emotion-regulation, and • Social resources

  6. process model • Focus of the present study: Does a sense of greater well-being or positive affect foster or increase resilient tendencies one year later? • Based on Fredrickson’s “broaden-and-build” theory which states that higher positive affect fosters great competence and striving (resilience?) • We measured three constructs that we thought would be related to each other over time: • Self-reports of the self as resilient; • Positive affect; and • Well-being (aspirations; pos relations with others; and confidence) • We sought to test the particular process model presented on the next page

  7. Do happy, well-adjusted adolescents evidence greater resilience over time? Well-being Resilient self-desc Positive Affect

  8. The youth connectedness project • Jan Pryor and I received financial support from the FRST Foundation to study adolescent development over three years time • Focus of this research endeavour was to study the function of social connectedness in promoting better adjustment in adolescents • It is a large scale longitudinal study (once a year for three years) largely representative of NZ youth

  9. Sample • 1,774 New Zealand adolescents (10-15 years at Y1) participated in a self-report study annually for three years • Recruited from about 100 schools scattered around the North Island • Almost a nationally representative sample: fewer rural kids, overrepresentation of Maori, no South Island participants • All measures yielded Cronbach’s alphas > .80.

  10. Measures • Wagnild and Young’s Resilience Scale (1993). The four items were: • “I keep myself busy and interested in things”, • “I try not to take things too seriously”, • “My belief in myself gets me through hard times” and • “I can find a way to fix my problems” • Well-being consisted of three subscales of 3 or 4 items each adapted from the Ryff Wellbeing Scales (Ryff & Keyes, 1995): • aspirations, • positive relations with others, and • Confidence • Positive affect(e.g., “I was happy”)

  11. results • A repeated-measures MANOVA showed that: • Positive affect and well-being decreased slightly over 3 years, but • Resilience did not change much • These results are generally supportive of the idea that resilience is trait-like, and that adolescent positive affect decreases during middle adolescence

  12. Latent variable longitudinal path models: proposed model Positive Affect T1 Positive Affect T2 Positive Affect T3 Well-being T2 Well-being T3 Well-being T1 Resilience T1 Resilience T2 Resilience T3

  13. Obtained model Positive Affect T1 Positive Affect T2 Positive Affect T3 .13*** .16*** Well-being T2 Well-being T3 Well-being T1 .20*** .24*** .07* .15*** Resilience T1 Resilience T2 Resilience T3

  14. What is important here? • It seems that we obtained some support for Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory in that an adolescent with higher well-being at a given point in time is likely to report higher resilience at a later point in time (residualised: change in resilience). • Positive affect (being happy) seems to be an outcome, not a driver of later states • Resilience fosters greater well-being, and well-being in turn fosters greater resilience • Next step? A study of mechanisms.

  15. What mediates between resilience and WB?

  16. Simpler depiction Resilience slope Well-being Slope Social provisions slope “Slope” refers to change in the variable over the three times of measurement.

  17. Latent growth curve mediation • Might “social provisions” (Cutrona & Russell, 1987) (positive aspects of social support) mediate between resilience and well-being • Answer: Yes. We found a significant bootstrapped indirect effect; about 37% of the total effect was mediated through social provisions.

  18. How about the reverse?WB => SocProv => Resilience • Answer: No. • Thus, it seems that well-being does not promote resilience through increasing social provisions.

  19. What mediates between resilience and Well-being?

  20. What mediates between well-being and resilience?

  21. What have we learned? • Resilience seems to lead to both increased positive attributes AND decreased negative attributes, which in turn lead to greater well-being: • Higher social provisions (Cutrona & Russell) • Lower lack of self-confidence, avoidance • Well-being seems to lead to greater resilience only through reductions in negative dynamics: • Lower lack of self-confidence, rumination, and avoidance • Not perfectly symmetrical, interesting to note

  22. Future directions • We need to separate the hedonic (being happy) from the eudaimonic (meaning of life) better so that we can identify how each contributes to resilience separately • How do these variables relate to coping strategies (problem-solving, reframing, etc.), social support, and social connectedness? • We intend to investigate moderators as well: age, gender, ethnicity, rural/urban, etc.

  23. A brief description of an intervention • The YCP dataset is a subject variable study: nothing is manipulated. • Can resilience be fostered? The previous findings suggest that it can, but how? • Olivia Notter and I set out to explicitly increase resilience in a small group of at-risk 13-yr-olds (key findings from her PhD thesis)

  24. Comparison of two interventions • Kiwi-Ace: a CBT-based programme designed to reduce depression by reducing illogical thinking • PAL (Positive Approaches to Life): our own programme designed to encourage the use of various positive psychology techniques: • Gratitude • Identifying strengths (& using them) • Enjoying life (savouring and obtaining flow) • Building relationships • Liking who I am

  25. Small groups • 27 in Kiwi-Ace, 38 in PAL, and equal numbers of control individuals • Obtained from 9 secondary schools in the lower North Island • Participants were recruited after a mass screening (over 1,000 students), we approached at-risk adolescents who were mid-range in depressive symptoms on the CDI

  26. Procedure • Small groups of 13-yr-olds received twelve one-hour sessions during class time over twelve consecutive weeks. • Sessions were provided by the in-school guidance counsellor plus an external clinical psychologist specifically trained in the two interventions. • Assessed on all variables immediately after the intervention ended (T2), 6 months later (T3), and 12 months later (T4).

  27. Results: effect of Kiwi-Ace on depression

  28. Results: effect of pal on depression

  29. Let’s focus on pal • We expected that PAL would lead to increases in a variety of positive outcomes: • Psychological well-being • Satisfaction with life • Subjective happiness • Gratitude • Resilience • Yes to all of these variables at all three subsequent time points

  30. Pal led to an increase in self-reported resilience

  31. Any evidence for what led to greater resilience? • We performed a set of longitudinal mediation analyses, and found the following mediators between PAL and subsequent resilience: • Gratitude • Life satisfaction • Subjective happiness

  32. What have we learned? • With both a subject variable and a quasi-experimental study, we saw that certain variables seem to foster greater resilience • Common thread between the two studies: well-being and happiness seems to “broaden and build” a young person’s ability to weather stressful events • I particularly like gratitude as a mechanism: young people who feel entitled tend to be brittle, whereas young people who appreciate the good things in their lives tend to be more resilient/realistic.

  33. Future directions • I think a large-scale replication of the PAL intervention is merited after these promising preliminary findings • Geelong Grammar School project (with input from Martin Seligman) seeks to do something similar

  34. Thanks for your time and attention • For more information: paul.jose@vuw.ac.nz • Thanks to Olivia Notter, the YCP research team, all participants, schools, and school personnel.

More Related