1 / 21

Technology and Sustainable Economic Development

Technology and Sustainable Economic Development. Nov 15, 2002. Outline. Introductions Motivation + Objectives Format Themes + Topics Living laboratory Today’s presentation proper. Introducing Ourselves. Alastair Iles

rosina
Download Presentation

Technology and Sustainable Economic Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology and Sustainable Economic Development Nov 15, 2002

  2. Outline • Introductions • Motivation + Objectives • Format • Themes + Topics • Living laboratory • Today’s presentation proper

  3. Introducing Ourselves • Alastair Iles • Postdoctoral research fellow at Society & Environment; Energy and Resources Group, UCB • Ph.D in environmental policy, Harvard, ‘00 • Research interests in policy, science, politics • Matthew Kam • 2nd-yr Ph.D. student in EECS with primary interest in Human-Centered Computing • B.A. Economics, B.S. EECS, UCB ’01 • B.A. thesis was his first shot at development microeconomics

  4. Motivation • Have not encountered similar opportunity at UCB for cross-disciplinary engagement on this topic • Technical design often isolated from social factors

  5. Motivation • But new research suggests: • Successful use of technology depends on tacit work practices developed for specific contexts • Decentralized technology may be more effective than centralized ones • Others?

  6. Objectives • Dual-track initiative • Technology track: How do we design technology for sustainable development? • Social track: What are the broader social, business and political contexts influencing the success of these designs?

  7. Objectives • Forum for interested UCB students to • Get acquainted • Keep up with related developments • Incubate alternative visions to advance sustainable development in both developing and developed countries using technology • Others? (do a poll here)

  8. Intended Participants • All interested folks are welcome! • Not restricted to Ph.D. students(we also have an undergraduate, exchange student, recent UCB graduates, and postdoc) • Not restricted to EECS, ERG or SIMS(would benefit from MBA, public policy, public health, other science/engineering and social sciences inputs)

  9. Tentative Format • Weekly 1-hour meetings • Format: • Presentation by volunteer (15 min) • Break-out discussions (15 min) • Combined discussion (20 min) • Format to be reviewed by everyone in last session of Fall ’02 (Dec 13)

  10. Broad Themes • Technology • Participatory design • Decentralized systems • Sustainable development • Economic, sociopolitical viability • Distributive effects of technology deployment • To review collectively after Fall ’02

  11. Specific Topics • Rotate among participants’ areas of interest / specialization • Topics: • EECS (albeit with SIMS / HCI / STS flavor) • Green technology • Economics • Others? (do a poll here) • Tentative plan: Fix topics for each session in advance, students (or volunteer presenter) in respective areas agree on reading(s)

  12. Living Laboratory • Intimate, long-term exposure to the design, use and evolution of technology promotes deeper appreciation and understanding • To observe CHSP regulations • Findings to be shared (and debated) among participants • Collectively work towards an interpretation, i.e. the “lessons learnt”

  13. Living Laboratory • First shot: Livenotes • Collaborative note-taking application • Handheld wireless tablets • E.g. of a decentralized, interactive technology • Call for volunteers (approx. 3)

  14. Any questions before we proceed with presentation of today’s readings? • What works?What doesn’t? • We’ll collectively review the reading group’s organization in last session of Fall ’02 (Dec 13)

  15. Today’s readings • Two chapters from the Worldwide Wildlife Fund report on IT/sustainability, July 2002: - Zambrano: intergovernmental funding and strategies for promoting technology - Wijkman & Afifi: what technology can do (today’s focus) • Written by government bureaucrats. • Focused on information technology (IT). • Just a starting point for discussion...

  16. Beginning Caveats... • What does “technology” cover? IT is just one of the technologies that could support sustainable development; technology designed for other purposes may be applied to environmental purposes. • What does sustainable development mean?The readings take it for granted that we know what SD is.

  17. Wijkman & Afifi (1) • Argues: - IT will transform society without physical work or materials - IT can help developing countries “leapfrog” over pollution and reduce energy intensity - UNDP Report 2001 shows that IT can help promote economic growth - however: there is a “digital divide” that exacerbates poverty, unemployment, underdevelopment...

  18. Wijkman & Afifi (2) • Argues: - the equity of the IT changes depends on human capital - “Those best placed to identify their tech. needs are the different stakeholders themselves.” - deliberate policy-making by governments is central. - the international community/market has been very slow to invest in IT in developing countries: the UN is disappointing.

  19. Wijkman & Afifi (3) • Examples of IT Uses: - farmers using the web or cell phones to check going prices for their produce - Village Knowledge Centers (South India) - Grameen Bank Pay Phones (Bangladesh) - Reproductive Health On-line (Uganda) - cyber kiosks run by village entrepreneurs (India)

  20. Wijkman & Afifi (4) • Questions: - Is “information” really separate from physical work and systems? Isn’t human capital needed to adapt IT to local social settings? - To what degree are “leapfrogging” and “climbing ladders” really effective? - Is there an excessive focus on web-based approaches, as contrasted to other IT technologies? The “put-everything-online” syndrome.

  21. Wijkman & Afifi (5) More questions: - Isn’t this approach like “e-government” and not participatory or grassroots? - Where are the communities whose needs are supposedly being addressed? - There is no mention of the energy needed to support the IT: how will this energy be provided?

More Related