1 / 64

Organizational Designs for Multinational Companies

8. Organizational Designs for Multinational Companies. Learning Objectives (1 of 2). Understand the components of organizational design. Know the basic building blocks of organization structure. Understand the structural options for multinational companies.

roxannek
Download Presentation

Organizational Designs for Multinational Companies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 8 Organizational Designs for Multinational Companies

  2. Learning Objectives (1 of 2) • Understand the components of organizational design. • Know the basic building blocks of organization structure. • Understand the structural options for multinational companies. • Know the choices multinationals have in the use of subsidiaries.

  3. Learning Objectives (2 of 2) • See the links between multinational strategies and structures. • Understand the basic mechanisms of organizational coordination and control. • Know how multinational companies use coordination and control mechanisms. • Understand the need for knowledge management systems within organizations.

  4. Organizational Design • The best multinational strategies do not guarantee success. Managers must design their organizations with the best mechanisms to carry out domestic and international strategies. • Organizational Design: How organizations structure subunits and use coordination and control mechanisms to achieve their strategic goals

  5. The Nature of Organizational Design (1 of 2) • Two basic questions involved in designing an organization: • How shall we divide the work among the organization’s subunits? • How shall we coordinate and control the efforts of the units we create? • In small organizations, there is little reason to divide work. Everyone does the same thing and everything

  6. The Nature of Organizational Design (2 of 2) • As organizations grow, there is a need to divide work into specialized jobs and the organization into specialized subunits. • Once an organization has specialized subunits, managers must develop measures to coordinate and control their efforts. • Decision-making may be centralized or decentralized. • There is no one best organizational design.

  7. The Basic Functional Structure (1 of 2) • In a Functional Structure, departments perform separate business functions such as marketing or manufacturing. • The functional structure is the simplest organization. • Most smaller organizations have functional structures. • Even large organizations have functional subunits. • Organizations choose a functional structure for its efficiency.

  8. The Basic Functional Structure (2 of 2) • Efficiencies arise from economies of scale in each function because of cost savings when a large number of people do the same job in the same location. • Coordination is difficult, as functional units are separated from each other and serve functional goals. • The functional structure works best when the firm has few products, locations, and types of customers. • Works best in a stable environment, with minimal need for adaptation.

  9. Exhibit 8.1: A Basic Functional Structure

  10. The Basic Product and Geographic Structures (1 of 2) • Product Structure: Building departments or subunits around a particular product. • Geographic Structure: Building departments or subunits based on a particular geographic region. • Product and Geographic units must still perform all of the functional tasks of a business. • Functional tasks are duplicated for each unit, leading to loss of economies of scale, and loss of efficiency.

  11. The Basic Product and Geographic Structures (2 of 2) • But, such inefficiencies disappear as customer groups and products proliferate. • And even for small organizations, a product or geographic unit may offer competitive advantages: • It allows a company to serve customer needs that vary by region or product. • Managers can quickly identify customer needs and adapt products.

  12. Exhibit 8.2: Basic Product Structure

  13. Exhibit 8.3: Basic Geographic Structure

  14. Hybrid Structures • Few organizations adopt purely organizational forms. • Each organization has unique trade-offs based on efficiency, product types, and customers’ needs. • Companies design organizations with mixtures of structures that will best implement their strategies. • Mixed-form organizations are called Hybrid Structures. • A Hybrid Structure mixes functional, geographic, and product units.

  15. Organizational Structures to Implement Multinational Strategies • When a company first goes international (as a passive exporter), it seldom changes its structure. • Even though exporting, it prefers to rely on EMCs and ETCs rather than change organizational structure. • Similarly, a licensing strategy has little impact on domestic structure. • However, when international sales become more central, the structure needs to be changed.

  16. The Export Department • The Export Department coordinates and controls a company’s export operations. • The Export department: • Is created when exports become significant • Deals with international sales of all products • Sales representatives in other countries may report to the Export Department manager.

  17. Exhibit 8.4: A Functional Structure with an Export Department

  18. Foreign Subsidiaries (1 of 3) • Foreign Subsidiaries are subunits of the multinational company that are located in another country • Types of foreign subsidiaries: • A Minireplica Subsidiary is a scaled down version of the parent firm. It uses the same technology and produces the same products as the parent firm. • A Transnational Subsidiary supports a multinational firm strategy based on location advantages. It has no firm wide form or function. Each subsidiary contributes what it does best or most efficiently anywhere in the world.

  19. Foreign Subsidiaries (2 of 3) • Most subsidiaries are neither pure minireplicas nor pure transnationals. • Foreign subsidiaries take many forms and have many functions. • Foreign subsidiaries are the structural building blocks for running multinationals.

  20. Foreign Subsidiaries (3 of 3) • Multinationals choose the mix of functions for their foreign subsidiaries based on: • The firm’s multinational strategy or strategies; • The subsidiaries’ capabilities and resources; • The economic and political risk of building and managing a subunit in another country; • How the subsidiaries fit into the overall multinational organizational structure.

  21. International Division (1 of 3) • The International Division differs from the export department in several ways: • It is larger and has greater responsibilities. • It has more extensive staff with international expertise. • It is responsible for managing exports, international sales, negotiating contracts, and managing foreign subsidiaries. • It is the usual step after the export department. • It deals with all products. • It manages overseas sales force and manufacturing sites.

  22. International Division (2 of 3) • The International Division has declined in popularity among large multinationals. • It is not considered effective for multiproduct companies operating in many countries. • However, for companies of moderate size with limited numbers of products or country locations, the International Division remains a popular and effective structure.

  23. Exhibit 8.5: International Division in a Domestic Product Structure

  24. International Division (3 of 3) • There are several structural options to deal with the shortcomings of the International Division: • Worldwide product structure • Worldwide geographic structure • Matrix structure • Transnational network structure

  25. Worldwide Geographic Structure (1 of 2) • In the Worldwide Geographic Structure, regions or large-market countries become the geographic divisions of the multinational company. • The primary reason to adopt this structure is to implement a multidomestic or regional strategy. • Differentiation of products or services requires an organizational design with maximum geographic flexibility.

  26. Worldwide Geographic Structure (2 of 2) • In the Worldwide Geographic Structure, regions or large-market countries become the geographic divisions of the multinational company.(cont’d) • The semiautonomous subunits provide flexibility to meet local needs. • Country-level divisions usually exist only when a country’s market size is sufficiently large to support its own organization. • Separate divisions make sense for large market countries.

  27. Exhibit 8.6: Royal Vopak’s Worldwide Geographic Structure

  28. Worldwide Product Structure • Product divisions form the basic units of the Worldwide Product Structure: • Each product division is responsible for producing and selling its products or services throughout the world. • It may be the ideal structure to implement an international strategy in which the firm gains economies of scale by selling worldwide product activities based at home. • This type of structure sacrifices the regional or local adaptation strengths derived from a geographical structure.

  29. Exhibit 8.7: Worldwide Product Structure

  30. Hybrids • Both Worldwide Product Structure and Worldwide Geographic Structure have advantages and disadvantages: • A Product Structure supports global products. • A Geographic Structure emphasizes local adaptation. • Multinationals often want both abilities. • To achieve this, most multinationals use a Hybrid form of structure, which combines both.

  31. Worldwide Matrix Structures (1 of 3) • To balance the benefits of geographic and product structures, and to coordinate their subunits, some multinationals create a Worldwide Matrix Structure: • Unlike hybrids, it is a symmetrical organization with equal lines of authority for worldwide product groups and geographical divisions. • The Geographic Divisions focus on national responsiveness. • The Product Divisions focus on finding global efficiencies.

  32. Worldwide Matrix Structures (2 of 3) • A Worldwide Matrix Structure: • Balances the benefits produced by area and product structures • Works best with near equal demands from both sides • Requires extensive resources for communication and coordination • Requires middle and upper level managers with good human relations skills • In theory, produces quality decisions

  33. Exhibit 8.8: Worldwide Matrix Structure

  34. Worldwide Matrix Structures (3 of 3) • Problems with Worldwide Matrix Structures: • Slow decision making process • Too bureaucratic • Too many meetings and too much conflict • Result: • Some companies have abandoned their matrixes and returned to product structures. • Others have redesigned their matrix structures to be more flexible with speedier decision making.

  35. The Transnational Network Structure (1 of 3) • Unlike the symmetrical matrix structure, TheTransnational Network has no basic form, symmetry or balance between geographic and product divisions. • Instead, TheTransnational Network links different functional, product, and geographic subsidiaries dispersed worldwide. • Nodes, units at the center of the network, coordinate product, functional and geographic information.

  36. The Transnational Network Structure (2 of 3) • No two subunits are alike. • Transnational units evolve to take advantage of resources, talent and market opportunities wherever they exist in the world. • Resources, people and ideas flow in all directions.

  37. Transnational Network Structures: An Example (1 of 2) • The Dutch multinational Philips Electronics N.V. works in 60 different countries, making products as diverse as defense systems and light bulbs. • Philips has 8 product divisions with more than 60 subgroups based on product similarity. • The product divisions have subsidiaries, which may focus on only one product or on an array of products. • Subsidiaries can specialize in R&D, sales, etc. • Some units are highly independent, some tightly controlled.

  38. Transnational Network Structures: An Example (2 of 2) • Philips divides the world into three groups: • Key countries such as the Netherlands and the United States produce for local and world markets, and control local sales • Large countries such as Mexico and Belgium have some local and worldwide production facilities and local sales. • Local business countries are smaller countries that are primarily sales units and that import products from the product divisions’ worldwide production centers in other countries.

  39. Exhibit 8.9: Geographic Links in the Philips Transnational Structure

  40. Exhibit 8.10: Product Links in the Philips Transnational Structure

  41. The Transnational Network Structure (3 of 3) • The basic structural framework of The Transnational Network has 3 components: • Dispersed subunits are subsidiaries located anywhere in the world they may benefit the firm. • Specialized Operations are subunits that specialize, whether in product lines, research or marketing. • Interdependent Relationships must exist to manage the dispersed and specialized subunits which share resources and information continuously.

  42. Metanational Structure • Large entrepreneurial multinational • Can tap into pockets of innovation, technology, and markets located around the world • An evolution of the transnational network structure that develops extensive systems to encourage organizational learning and entrepreneurial activities

  43. Beyond the Transnational:The Metanational? (1 of 2) • Structure for multinational firms continues to evolve. • A new structure is emerging called The Metanational, a large, entrepreneurial multinational firm able to tap into hidden pockets of innovation, technology and markets, especially emerging markets worldwide. • The Metanational is similar to the Transnational: • It is a networked, but centerless organization • Decision-making resides with the subunits.

  44. Beyond the Transnational:The Metanational? (2 of 2) • The Metanational is different from the Transnational in that: • It has an overriding objective to learn from anywhere in the world, and to share that knowledge with everyone in the company. • The Metanational organization uses the latest in virtual connectivity to link team members worldwide.

  45. Characteristics of Metanationals (1 of 2) • The characteristics of the Metanational structure are: • Nonstandard business formulas for any local activity • Looking to emerging markets as sources of knowledge and ideas, not just for local labor • Creating a culture and advanced communication system that supporting global learning • Extensive use of strategic alliances to gain knowledge for varied sources

  46. Characteristics of Metanationals (2 of 2) • The characteristics of the Metanational structure (cont’d): • High levels of trust between partners to encourage knowledge sharing • A centerless structure that moves strategic functions away from headquarters and to major markets • A decentralization of decision making to managers who serve key customers and strategic partners

  47. Multinational Strategy and Structure: An Overview • Most companies support early internationalization efforts with export departments. • Depending on globalization strategy, they evolve into product or geographic structure. • Pressures for local adaptation and global efficiencies move to matrix or transnational network structures. • Most companies never quite reach a pure structure, and instead, adopt a hybrid structure.

  48. Exhibit 8.11: Multinational Strategy, Structure, and Evolution

  49. Control and Coordination Systems (1 of 2) • Although different subunits perform specialized tasks, managers must design organizational systems to control and coordinate their activities. • Control Systems help link the organization vertically, up and down the organizational hierarchy in two ways: • They measure or monitor performance of the subunits • They provide feedback on effectiveness to subunit managers

  50. Control and Coordination Systems (2 of 2) • Coordination Systems link the organization horizontally. • Coordination Systems provide information flows among subsidiaries so that they can coordinate their activities. • Example: Ford plans to use advanced information systems so that designers in Europe, the U.S. and Japan can coordinate their design efforts for the world market.

More Related