1 / 156

TEL 319

TEL 319. World Media Systems. The two main questions of this course:. What makes countries and their media different?

roy
Download Presentation

TEL 319

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TEL 319 World Media Systems

  2. The two main questions of this course: • What makes countries and their media different? • What makes them different along the media “have” / “have not” scale? I.e. Why do some nations have a lot of communication devices and produce a lot of content and other countries a little or none?

  3. History of Telecommunications • Factors determining the evolution of modern communications: • Technological progress • Social transformations • Institutional evolution

  4. History of telecommunications • From Post to Telegraph • Couriers – lasted for a few thousand years: • King Sargon, 3800 BC – Postmaster, maps • Cyrus the Great and his Royal Couriers – The Great Road  Sardes to Susa 1800 miles 111 stations • Romans  The Via system – Roman roads width “directly influences” the gauge of modern railways – 90,000 kilometers or 54,000 miles (see link) • The stage-coach system in the US – Pony express 2000 miles in 10 days

  5. From travel to signals Send the message, not the messenger Signaling systems: • Greek firegrams • Persian, Gaelic and Amerindian voicegrams • Talking drums and talking cannons (Hudson valley) • Chappe’s semaphore – a cross with moving arms that were moved to create coded signals – first optical telegraph – France had in 1850 500 stations covering 2800 miles

  6. FIRST TELEGRAPH • GREEK Telegraphs: • Water tank and torch • Drain water for as long as you see the torch lit at the nearby station • When torch disappears read the message on the floating rod

  7. CHAPPE’S TELEGRAPH • First telegraphs: Chappe’s optical telegraph – Invented during the French revolution • Position of the arms determined the letter or a brief message • 1850: 500 stations covering 2800 miles in France

  8. History of Telecommunications • Telegraph • Built on the idea of optical telegraph • Instead of using light, use electromagnetism • Noticed that electricity transfers quickly at great distance and creates a magnetic force • The inventor of telegraph was an amateur American painter  Morse 1845 Baltimore Washington; • Cyrus Field:1858 1st successful transatlantic cable; 1866 first long term cable connection • Government refused the monopoly  first telegraph titan Western Union

  9. The telegraph Samuel Morse: amateur painter and inventor Invented the device and its alphabet (1844) – but not telegraphy itself S = . . . O = _ _ _ S = … First transatlantic cable 1858 (successful 1866) Major impact: the “wire” news agency

  10. History of Telecommunications • THE CONTENT/SOCIAL REVOLUTION - From Quipu-s to print • Letters: some written, some orally delivered, some inscribed in ropes • Manuscripts took forever to produce: 2 bibles per year • Print revolution: 1 bible in a week or even a day – runs of 2000-3000 exemplars • 1500 AD: 20 million books in Europe, for a population of 100 million people • Print revolution: not only technological but also social • The rational-populist revolution: • Protestantism and its emphasis on literacy (personal knowledge of Scriptures) • Humanism and emphasis on general education and pursuit of knowledge beyond the limits (although not necessarily against) tradition • Using science to improve everyday life  needs more knowledge, etc.

  11. History of telecommunications • The modern institutional system • Royal post for centralizing absolutist monarchies 1400-1500 – e.g. France or Spain • Where the system was decentralized the postal system was private  Germany and the Venetian Taxis • Era of war and nationalism (Napoleon): • All systems have, in the end, been taken under governmental control • For “reasons of state” – frequently war

  12. Theory of libertarian (“liberal”) and communitarian (social responsibility) media systems • Libertarian media systems are based on a theory of society and of the press • Libertarian theory: • Facilitated by the Reformation • freeing conscience from bureaucratic churches frees individuals and consciousness from the manacles of tradition and authority • Appears in England, XVII century (Milton, Locke) • Developed in the US (Jefferson) and in England (Mill) • Consecrated by the US constitution • Not a “pure” system of laws anymore

  13. Libertarian theory assumptions • Three assumptions – all optimistic – about the: • Nature of man: rational, end in himself, autonomous and creative • Nature of society/state: a natural contract of free individuals to preserve their individual happiness and autonomy; is not a reality greater than its members • Nature of knowledge: empirical and plural

  14. Impact of liberal theory of knowledge on media theory and practice • Two part argument • Capacity to know is given to all by God; knowledge, however, is to be acquired individually: • Knowledge is empirical  given in our experiences; • there are as many varieties of knowledge (truths) as many experiences • the truth emerges by “rubbing” these individual truths on each other • Is a self-correcting, progressive, emergent process • A free and unfettered press (“free market-place of ideas”) is needed to allow the opinions to confront and correct each other (“self-righting” process) • See quote from Becker on page 44 and Milton’s argument summarized on pages 44 and 45

  15. Mill’s reasons why the advantages of a free market-place of ideas outweigh its disadvantages • Main disadvantage of a pluralistic market-place: we have to put up with a lot of wrong-headed of even malicious ideas that have to be accepted as true until proved wrong • Mill says that even wrong ideas and opinions have value: • If we silence one opinion, even if this is wrong, we silence not one individual but the truth-making process itself • Even a wrong opinion might contain a grain of truth which we need for getting the complete picture • Even if the majority holds the right opinion, the dissenting opinion performs a useful function: it forces the majority to defend its ideas and not accept them as dogma • Unless challenged, truths lose their vitality and their impact on character and conduct

  16. Effects of Libertarian theory on political institutions • The country that has first enshrined the libertarian idea in its laws were the US • Bill of Rights  First Amendment • Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. • Instead of specifying what (or what cannot) be said, the Constitution specifically mentions that everything can be said, without prior censorship • However, even in the US, there are limitations: • Libelous, offensive and indecent speech are not protected • Speech that presents a clear and present danger to the individual and collective security of the US citizens (WWI, justice Holmes) • Yet, these are more theoretical than practical – rarely applied, especially to print media

  17. Communitarian (social responsibility) media • Main idea – the goal of communication systems is to further the goals and happiness of the community not that of the individual • Relies on different assumptions – mostly pessimistic—about man, society and truth • Man is not an autonomous agent – society is what makes him what he his – individual freedom is useless unless society makes sure that all have the same potential to achieve • Society/governments are the goal of individual existence, they are more than the sum of their parts • People are gullible and their innate desire to achieve true knowledge is debatable we cannot trust people to arrive at some greater truth through interaction (p. 100) • Somebody needs to tell people the truth, which is related to societal goals • Knowledge is always related to its usefulness for furthering the goals of society/state • We are given the right to know and express our ideas to further the good of the society as a whole, if we do not do so, we might forfeit this right (?)

  18. Caveats to the two “theories” of the press discussed here • Chapter 3 in Siebert, Peterson and Schramm says that soc. Responsibility theory is uniquely American • In fact it develops on the European / socialist tradition (society and the state are greater realities and more important) than the individual • Social-responsibility theory was quite successful in the US, but not across the board. While the print media remains libertarian, broadcasting and some telecommunications are regulated within a “social responsibility” framework  although this conflicts with the first amendment • No pure libertarian system, anywhere • Europe: social responsibility theory and practices are less strong than they used to be, libertarianism has made strong inroads (privatization)

  19. Communitarian (social responsibility) media systems • Main characteristic of social responsibility or communitarian media: • Media should serve a greater purpose, dictated by the state  social development, improve race relations, involve citizens in democratic debate etc. • Freedom is not “from” but “for” • Freedom of expression is not just a right but also a duty, if duty neglected or misused, right lost

  20. Social responsibility media in an ideal world • Media should perform pre-set goals (not just in principle, but specifically and self-consciously), such as: • service the political system  make people vote • Educate people • Promote health and other social campaign • Hutchins Commission on the Freedom of the Press (see this link for more information) set the following goals • Make the factual knowledge presented in the news relevant (by some external standards) • Allow fringe opinions, even if unpopular and unacceptable by the public known, even make an extra effort to be known • Have a self-conscious race and ethnicity related policy of news coverage • Media should present and clarify the goals and values of society (should be subordinated to these goals and values) • Greater societal / media transparency

  21. Social responsibility media: possible problems • Whose standards should we use for making the news relevant? • What fringe opinion are to be given an extra-voice? • Whose values and goals is media supposed to promote?

  22. Modern Media systems: Western Media • Defined in terms of: • Their political and social regimes: • Libertarian/populist – American and Anglo-Saxon • Private initiative • Market driven; loosely regulated • Neutral in tone; general purpose; provincial • Strengthened by technological innovation • Communitarian/elitist – European and Asian (Japanese) • State or mixed state-private ownership • Tightly regulated and politically controlled • Partisan and associated with various groups; located in the capital city • Considerably weakened by technological innovation • To serve and to entertain the “people” (populist) although in Europe there is a conflict between populism and elitism • Two layers: national and multinational

  23. American Media • Dominant force in the world. Why? • Influence or force? (see characteristics) • Central values: • Political: Freedom (1st Amendment “Congress shall make no law”). • Business: creativity, risk-taking, versatility on a market-based background • Economies of scale: internally and externally • A large internal market allows producing for outside markets at low cost • Content and social values: • Neutrality in content – people expect to be informed in order to create their own opinions – they do not expect to be preached at or indoctrinated • Individuality and personal freedom – each reader/member of the audience is a hero or should be able to identify with the hero – sitcoms and dramas – “ideal mirrors of reality” / Populism

  24. Main characteristics of American Media: • Fragmented: • Geographically -- no national newspaper; typical newspaper 50,000 readers • “Hardware” and “software” ownership does not always overlap • Broadcasting is both centralized and decentralized • Institutionally – • the decline of the national networks and ascent of niche programming  fragmented audiences – Superbowl most watched TV show – 60% share; Seinfeld 20-30% share; regularly a show attracts about 15% rating (American Idol, ER, etc.) • News media pretends to be “above the fry” – no clear political or social affiliation, although this is eroding – NPR, NYTIMES, CNN perceived as being to close to the left; Fox News and Talk Radio – more in tune with the right • Elite (National Review, the New Republic) or low-brow (National Enquirer) publications are relatively small • Globalized: • American media is not a strictly national affair  CNN, SONY, FOX – combines localism with globalism • More and more local shows are produced with an eye to foreign markets (“lowest common denominator”) • Technologically adept: pioneers Radio, Television, Cable, Satellite and Internet communication

  25. United Kingdom • Similarities with the US: • Based on an assumption of freedom, not regulation: No press law • Dissimilarities (along the lines mentioned above – government and communitarian concerns): • Politically-oriented national media dominates • Quality newspapers: The Times, Daily Telegraph, The Independent, The Guardian - centralized • A score of tabloids: Sun (Conservative); Daily Mirror (Labour) – circulation 3 - 4 million (for a population 1/5 that of US) • Broadcasting: • dominated by the BBC and by the ITN (independent but fiercely regulated) networks • Satellite and cable has broken the spell of state monopoly • Political control: Journalism board and special governmental laws can curtail freedom of speech – remnants of royal (now governmental) authoritarianism • World news leader due to its imperial prestige  BBC World Service 150 million listeners although in the US is now available only on-line

  26. France • Illustrates the difference between US and Europe the best • One of the most powerful states in Europe: clear laws for suppressing or infringing on an absolute freedom of the press – • See Gubler vs. Mitterand example (http://www.sokol-law-offices.com/mitterandarticle.htm) • Book author convicted for a criminal offense for publishing a book about the illness of the former president Mitterand • Media dominated by Paris - centralized • Newspapers clearly politically oriented along not only ideological but also party lines: France Soir, Le Monde, L’Humanite • Television, until 1987 controlled by the government • Changes: Television privatized under technological pressure • Mass media more commercial and more global (Vivendi) • Struggles technologically – Minitel and low rate of cable and Internet penetration (30%)

  27. Germany • Regionalized and fragmented (imposed by the Allies after WWII) • Several layers of government keep media in check • Organization • (Paradox) National newspapers are all provincial: FAZ, FR, SDZ (and of course partisan); most quality journals, one national tabloid (Bild) • Content • Newspapers and TV shows are relatively tame – do not confront authority too violently exception Der Spiegel • There is at least one type of speech which is totally censored: fascist and extremist speech • Technology and regulation • Television scene dominated by governmental networks: ARD and ZDF  great progress toward cable and private but not as much as expected • Not the most advanced technologically in Europe, Internet penetration 40% -- after UK (60%) and Scandinavian nations (70%)

  28. The minor Anglo Saxons • Canada, Australia, New Zeeland • Relatively dynamic, combine government with private initiative (like UK) • Canadian protectionism (no tax exemption for advertising in American media) • Little brother advantage • Attractive as movie-making locations (Lord of the Rings, Xena, etc) • Directors, actors and technicians can more easily immigrate to the US – name an actor or personality • Use US as a global platform – Murdoch and his global interests: Europe, Asia and America

  29. An exception in the making: Scandinavian countries • Traditionally very statist (social-democratic—ie “liberal”) nations • Regressive tax on advertising in Sweden • Today at the forefront of the Internet revolution: • Finland: Highest Internet penetration rate in Europe • Some of the highest rates of cable penetration

  30. Japan • Most communitarian media system – atypical • Japan, Inc. – Social organization based on harmony “wa” – adjust your values to those of the group • Wa directs the way the media is controlled • See press correspondents clubs (rarely include foreign journalists) • News that can bother the emperor are not publicized – Crown prince’s search for a wife and her pregnancy were barely publicized in Japan • Centralized: • Three large newspapers, with local editions, largest circulation: Asahi Shimbun – 14,000,000 daily copies • Several Television Station (NHK and Fuji) • Governmental control  HDTV partial failure • Technologically sophisticated • Powerful hardware industry (most tv sets, VCRs or other electronics are produced in Japan or China, by Japanese affiliates) • But low computer penetration – complex alphabet and less emphasis on individualized technologies

  31. European Union media policy • 1989 Television without frontiers: counteract Hollywood domination  50% of programming should be local • Paradoxical: without frontiers inside but raising a Chinese wall outside • Private industry quite successful in creating Europe-wide media channels: Euronews, Sky, RTL • European policy makers followers, not leaders in Internet revolution • When ahead in the game, misguided – see the French Internet: Minitel

  32. The multinational puzzle • Largest media companies rarely national • They own and co-own each other across borders • Synergy: mix technology, consumer goods and content • Transborder “imperialism”: reflection of an interdependent world • Most of the transactions are in the Western World

  33. The multinationals • Time-Warner/AOL – Remember CNN, TNT, TBS, Netscape, Compuserve? They are all here. • VIACOM/CBS – MTV and Dan Rather • Disney/ABC – Mickey and X-treme sports ESPN • Bertelsmann – “German” BMG, Arista (rap and hip-hop) and RTL • News Corporation/Fox – “Australian” includes STAR TV, largest Asian satellite service • Sony / Columbia Pictures / CBS records (Electronics, Music, Film) • Vivendi Universal – “French” Water, energy utility company buys Universal Media & Studios, joins whiskey smuggler company Seagram to form a 50 bn dollar empire • VNU – “Dutch” Nielsen; Hollywood dealmaker and distributor owns Billboard, Hollywood Reporter, Adweek

  34. Totalitarian media systems • Generated by communist and nationalist-socialist political systems • They are an extreme form of communitarian media – their most extreme, anti-humanistic form • They are NOT the unique product of specific individuals (Stalin, Sadam, Kim Jong Il) or specific nations (Russia, China, Korea) • They are the product of ideological fervor and zealotry • Produced by political parties armed with an ideology of “enlightenment” – they KNOW the truth, which is one and forever

  35. Totalitarian Media System Assumptions • Nature of Man: strictly controlled and regulated by a socio-economic (class), race or religious background • Nature of Society and State: are not only the primary element of social life but their true and only justified goal – hive mentality • Nature of Knowledge: Is acquired by enlightened elites organized in formal institutions – parties -- who have privileged access to “ultimate revealed truths”– • e.g. in communist regime true knowledge is revealed by the Marxist doctrine, whose sole repository and interpreter is the Communist Party leadership • In nationalist regimes to “savior”-like leaders and parties (NSDAP Germany, or Baath Party in Iraq) and or the military • In fundamentalist regimes to a church and its clergy – Iran, Saudi Arabia • Totalitarian Systems: • Communist and post-communist: Cuba, North Korea, China, Vietnam, Laos, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan • National-socialist: Syria, Iraq, Lybia, Burma, • Fundamentalist: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Taliban Afghanistan, Osama’s Caliphate

  36. Totalitarian Media Systems -- Communism • Born out of the great Marxian-proletarian intellectual revolution of 19th Century • Main goal: replace all that is bad and imperfect on this world (economic inequality, social conflicts, injustice) with a perfect world • Perfection to be achieved not through reform but through radical revolution  violence • Why? Marx said that world progresses through contradictions, and reform only moves only the object of contradictions, not contradiction itself • Proletarian revolution the only one that removes contradictions by removing social class. This is done by eliminating private property and free markets

  37. Classic Communist media systems • The political system is reduced to ONE party which is identified with the state – • The state is usually identified with the Supreme Leader • Each state institution is intertwined with a parallel system of party control • the state is a front for the party and for the upper clique ruling the country • The party considers itself entitled to absolute control because it is the institution that has absolute control over understanding where society and the world are going • Media becomes a bureaucratic department of the party: Propaganda and Agitation

  38. Functions of Mass Communication in Totalitarian Systems • Serve other state institutions: Army, Health, Education, Propaganda • Are seen as an instrument of unity • They “explain” and interpret political “revelations” Freedom in these systems: “freedom to participate within the system; to acquiesce with the system”

  39. News content in Communist/totalitarian Media • There are no episodic events that can be reported as they come • There is only one event, building socialism, strengthening the nation, revealing God’s will • Each article is meant to reveal and reinforce this event – they are proof that the story is right, not that there is a story to tell • It is all interpretation and all opinion (no objectivity). The only “straight” news refer to the Leader’s Acts – see North Korea Handout

  40. Structure • All media is owned and controlled by the government • It is part of the governmental structure • It is fiercely centralized and narrowly specialized: • Trade Union Newspapers • Military Newspapers • Medical Newspapers

  41. Totalitarian Media -- Examples • North Korea – N Korean Press Agency • Daily news – see handout: • The leader visits agricultural project • Secret Police officers offer thousands of potted Kimjongillias to the government. The flower was named after the President – Kim Jong Il (see details here) • Vietnam • Media has to have an “Educational” content  sometimes supported by American money see link here • News are usually congratulatory or self-congratulatory. When reporting incidents, they are usually created by the capitalists (see here)

  42. Chinese Media • A media system “in transition” • Dominated by state media owned by the Communist Party, the Military, or by the local and central government • Somewhat more liberal in the area of entertainment but news is tightly controlled • More liberal media policy • Free Talk radio • Lively magazines • Party and governmental newspapers increasingly rely on advertising • Critical issue • Ownership: capitalist market without capitalists, • State organizations own and cross-own media • Makes regulation and control easier

  43. Chinese media • The seven NOs • You are free to publish whatever you want as long as you do not: • Negate the guiding role of Marxism, Maoism or Deng Xio Pingsm • Oppose the Communist Party • Reveal “state secrets” • Oppose the national (“minority”) policy of the govt. • Advocate superstition, pseudo-science, violence and obscenity • Spread rumors • Violate national publishing and advertising discipline

  44. Non Western Media • Dominated by authoritarian media systems • Authoritarian system: • Although there are laws on the book that guarantee freedom of expression, similar to communitarian and libertarian systems, they are ignored, circumvented and suppressed by raw force • The countries are ruled as dictatorships (royal or republican) • They can easily convert to democracy and libertarianism or communitarianism if the political leaders are eliminated (Italy, Spain) • Difference, communitarian—authoritarian—totalitarian: • Communitarian systems: media is regulated by clear laws which although more restrictive than in libertarian systems also ensure certain liberties • Communitarian media always function within the confines of the law • Totalitarian media systems suppress and repress freedom using laws: • Communist freedom of expression is always to be exercised within the system, which requires to support and promote the socialist/religious values of the system – See the 7 Chinese “NOs” • Authoritarian systems • Brutal and direct censorship and political manipulation of news content • Political influence above and beyond the law – uses raw force to impose its will • Some areas of freedom are allowed: e.g. entertainment • Although slightly communitarian, they have no set assumptions about man and society, it is all in the needs and ideas of the leaders/elites

  45. Causes of authoritarianism • Why are many non-Western media systems authoritarian? • Social, ethnic and political cleavages – • authoritarianism a way of keeping the nation together: • Media is a symbol of control and power • A symbol of national pride and identity • Access to media unequal within and between nations • Purportedly facilitates development

  46. Nigeria: Case study in authoritarianism • Most populous African nation, one of the richest (oil) and ethnically diverse (Muslim-Hausa, Ibo and Yoruba-Christian, native religious split) • Hierarchical vs. egalitarian political traditions (North vs. South) • A strong secular legal and political tradition (British law) but very fragmented and corrupt political system (Transparency International ranks Nigeria second before last in a list of 90 nations) • Strong business class especially among the Southerners

  47. Nigeria – case study • Ethnic tensions  frequent coups • Alternates between democracy and dictatorship • Frequent journalists imprisonment (local lore “you are not a journalist until you spend some time in prison”) • Poor infrastructure hinders media work • National news agency mandated by law to: • Be patriotic, truthful, honest and fair • Don’t be an opponent of government, but a friendly critic • Frequent discussions about licensing journalists

  48. Nigeria • More recently there has been a period of relative democratization but the authoritarianism of the leaders was replaced with that of the various ethnic and religious traditions • Northerners, Muslims, want common law to be replaced by Sharia (Islamic law), which uses corporal punishments and amputations • The great Nigerian Miss World Debacle of Nov, 2002 see link and video • Miss World to be held in Lagos, capital of Nigeria • The fundamentalist northern Muslims wanted the event to be cancelled (“decadent,” “corrupts the youth”) • A secular newspaper (ThisDay) published a funny/sacrilegious editorial written by an English educated young woman saying that the Muslims should not be offended by the event; if Mohamed, who had several wives, were to attend the event he would for sure choose at least one of the contestants to join his harem • Muslim riots—sacrilege—hundreds of deaths, Miss World was cancelled and moved to London • The journalist had to leave the country and the newspaper to apologize • Conclusion: authoritarianism does not need to come from above, sometimes it can come from below, from the grassroots. Mass media can be a particularly powerful source of contention

  49. Non-Western media and the issue of development • Non-Western world inheritor of: • Colonial rule and underdevelopment of modern civil life • Historical low level of education and technology (including farming and health) • Traditional values: power, religion, personal worth  hierarchical and personal • Media can/should be used to solve these problems • Currently two understandings of “developmental media” • In the communitarian and libertarian tradition • Media as great multiplier, use its potentialities (as prescribed by traditional theories) – Lerner, Schramm social watchdog broadens horizons, rises aspirations feed interpersonal channels enforce social and political norms • Media should be used as agent of diffusion of innovation (like agricultural extensions in US); supplements existing culture • Second understanding of developmental media – closer to totalitarian theory: • Using a socialist-Marxist paradigm • Challenges the idea that democracy or Western-style industrialization are good for a nation • Western-style media and “freedom of speech:” commercialism fosters colonialism • Need for “Development news”: news-process owned and directed by the nation

  50. Can media and technology help development? • Second wave of media development was a disaster – it fostered authoritarianism and it did little for improving people’s lives • Media can help in health, education or training campaigns, but not when vaccines are missing, teachers are underpaid and training is ideological indoctrination • First take care of the basics • Can technology solve the problem of development? • Setting up state owned television and radio only helps the leaders to indoctrinate the people  TV and radio set ownership does not translate into development • However, setting telephone systems fosters development – Leapfrogging: cellular telephony a great success throughout the world, but limited by need to interoperate with land-based companies and cost • Success stories: Lebanon, Romania, Nigeria, China (see link) • The formula that worked was that of free markets not universal taxation • ITU proposals: Maitland program and tax on telecom  Tax on international telecom for World Universal Service (1day walk rule) – 12 bn / year • Private industry ignored, but it did exactly that: satellite telephones at lower price (however, its most avid users are Osama and isolated terrorists) • Free markets usually solve rather than impair development (see the development of television in Latin America) • Can democracy and freedom of expression save countries from poverty? • Democracy does not create prosperity but can break the cycle of tyranny, corruption and under-development

More Related