1 / 18

Lecture 4 – Relaunching integration: The SEA, Maastricht and beyond.

Lecture 4 – Relaunching integration: The SEA, Maastricht and beyond. Prof. Andreas Bieler. Structure of the lecture:. I. The Internal Market programme and Single European Act; II. The Treaty of Maastricht; Focus on historical background, contents of treaties and theoretical explanation;.

rrochelle
Download Presentation

Lecture 4 – Relaunching integration: The SEA, Maastricht and beyond.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 4 – Relaunching integration: The SEA, Maastricht and beyond. Prof. Andreas Bieler

  2. Structure of the lecture: • I. The Internal Market programme and Single European Act; • II. The Treaty of Maastricht; Focus on historical background, contents of treaties and theoretical explanation;

  3. I. The Internal Market programme and Single European Act: • Events leading to the revival of European integration: • ECJ ruling on the Cassis de Dijon (1979) case led to the establishment of the “mutual recognition” principle; • 1984 EP’s “Draft Treaty Establishing the European Union”; • 1984 EU European Council summit in Fontainebleu: solution to the British budget problem;

  4. 2. Historical background and contents of SEA: • 1985 European Council summit in Milan: • acceptance of the Commission White Paper on the Internal Market; • decision on IGC in relation to treaty reform, intended to facilitate the establishment of the Internal Market, was taken against British, Danish and Greek objections; • Single European Act was signed in January 1986 and came into force on 1 July 1987;

  5. b) Contents of Single European Act: • Treaty basis and clear timetable for establishment of Internal Market; • Council: introduction of QMV most importantly in relation to Internal Market issues; • EP: introduction of cooperation and the assent decision-making procedure; • European Court of Justice: arbiter of Internal Market and establishment of a Court of First Instance to help with the workload;

  6. 3. Explanation of the revival of European integration: a) Intergovernmentalism:

  7. Intergovernmentalism - Problems: • inability to account for role of transnational actors in general and TNCs in particular; • under-evaluation of Delors/Commission impetus; • why did countries agree on delegating and pooling some parts of their sovereignty? • neglect of independent role of ideas: how can the rise of neo-liberal economics be explained?

  8. b) Neo-functionalism: • realisation that co-operation is the better strategy to achieve mutual economic gains; • highlighting the role of the ECJ (Cassis de Dijon case) and the EP (Draft Treaty on European Union); • leadership by Delors and the Commission; • role of the European Round Table of Industrialists: group of CE of big European TNCs; • further spill-over to new areas: e.g. EMU as a result of the free flow of capital;

  9. Neo-functionalism – Problems: • no functional spill-over prior to TNC engagement: revival, not continuation of integration; • TNCs lobbied predominantly national governments; • no automaticity of integration, especially in relation to spill-over to further areas;

  10. II. The Treaty of Maastricht: • Historical background: • June 1989 European Council meeting in Madrid: Delors Committee three stage report was accepted; start of first stage on 1 July 1990; decision on IGC to define stage 2 and 3; • moves towards an IGC on EPU: links between German unification and deeper political integration and between EMU and European Political Union (EPU) were forged in the closing months of 1989;

  11. 2. Contents of the Maastricht Treaty: • The European Communities: • Institutional changes: co-decision procedure giving the EP the right to veto legislation; (2) Commission being subject to a vote of approval by the EP; and (3) ECJ is given the power to impose fines on member states not complying with its judgements or Community law;

  12. Treaty of Maastricht – Contents: • Policy change: (1) definition of, and timetable for, EMU; (2) Social Protocol on social policy; • CFSP: development of a common foreign and security policy; • JHA: common policies in the areas of asylum, international crime, etc.

  13. 3. Theoretical explanation of the Maastricht Treaty: • Neo-functionalism: • further spill-over pressures from Internal Market: pressures towards EMU; towards a common immigration policy; towards a strengthened common regional policy; and towards a common social policy; • role of Commission and Delors: early stress of necessity of common monetary policy; • pressure by European TNCs organised within the ERT and the Association for Monetary Union in Europe;

  14. Neo-functionalism – Problems: • why an IGC on European Political Union? • price stability could also have been achieved via unilateral approach (independent national central banks, pegging of currency to a strong foreign currency) or multilateral approach (improved EMS); • no automaticity of spill-over pressures resulting in steps of further integration;

  15. b) Liberal intergovernmentalism Liberal theory of national preference formation: • general convergence around neo-liberal economics; • France: (1) imbalance within EMS giving Germany predominance; (2) need to bind unified Germany into Europe; • Italy: attempt to introduce neo-liberal policies at home through binding in hands at supranational level; • Germany: (1) political need to reassure other countries about Germany’s commitment to EU despite re-unification;

  16. Liberal intergovernmentalism: Intergovernmentalist analysis of inter-state relations: • better performance by Japan and USA required joint economic response by European countries; • integration only in area of low politics, but not in areas of high politics: CFSP and JHA are both intergovernmental pillars; • British opt-outs: EMU and Social Chapter;

  17. Liberal intergovernmentalism: Extended version of regime theory: • states delegate sovereignty to supranational institutions to attain a higher decision-making efficiency: (1) ECJ as arbiter of Internal Market; (2) right of Commission to initiate new legislation; • external restrictions are accepted because they strengthen governments vis-à-vis domestic actors: Italy and the problems to push through reform;

  18. Liberal intergovernmentalism – Problems: • no account of transnational actors; • no account for emergence of neo-liberalism as new economic consensus; • no explanation for why the EP gained new powers, although this made the decision-making procedures more complex rather than efficient;

More Related